A Reynolds shear stress model for constant-pressure boundary layers

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 055117
Author(s):  
J. Dey ◽  
Phani Kumar P.
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Constant Pressure ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Stress Model

The Effects of Adverse Pressure Gradients on Momentum and Thermal Structures in Transitional Boundary Layers: Part 2—Fluctuation Quantities

1996 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 728-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Mislevy ◽  
T. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Transition Region ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Shear ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Baseline Case ◽  
Near Wall

The effects of adverse pressure gradients on the thermal and momentum characteristics of a heated transitional boundary layer were investigated with free-stream turbulence ranging from 0.3 to 0.6 percent. Boundary layer measurements were conducted for two constant-K cases, K1 = −0.51 × 10−6 and K2 = −1.05 × 10−6. The fluctuation quantities, u′, ν′, t′, the Reynolds shear stress (uν), and the Reynolds heat fluxes (νt and ut) were measured. In general, u′/U∞, ν′/U∞, and νt have higher values across the boundary layer for the adverse pressure-gradient cases than they do for the baseline case (K = 0). The development of ν′ for the adverse pressure gradients was more actively involved than that of the baseline. In the early transition region, the Reynolds shear stress distribution for the K2 case showed a near-wall region of high-turbulent shear generated at Y+ = 7. At stations farther downstream, this near-wall shear reduced in magnitude, while a second region of high-turbulent shear developed at Y+ = 70. For the baseline case, however, the maximum turbulent shear in the transition region was generated at Y+ = 70, and no near-wall high-shear region was seen. Stronger adverse pressure gradients appear to produce more uniform and higher t′ in the near-wall region (Y+ < 20) in both transitional and turbulent boundary layers. The instantaneous velocity signals did not show any clear turbulent/nonturbulent demarcations in the transition region. Increasingly stronger adverse pressure gradients seemed to produce large non turbulent unsteadiness (or instability waves) at a similar magnitude as the turbulent fluctuations such that the production of turbulent spots was obscured. The turbulent spots could not be identified visually or through conventional conditional-sampling schemes. In addition, the streamwise evolution of eddy viscosity, turbulent thermal diffusivity, and Prt, are also presented.

Turbulent Boundary Layers Subjected to Multiple Strains

1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (3) ◽  
pp. 526-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas C. Schwarz ◽  
Michael W. Plesniak ◽  
S. N. B. Murthy
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Laser Doppler Velocimeter ◽  
Strain Rates ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Convex Curvature ◽  
Multiple Strain Rates

Turbomachinery flows can be extremely difficult to predict, due to a multitude of effects, including interacting strain rates, compressibility, and rotation. The primary objective of this investigation was to study the influence of multiple strain rates (favorable streamwise pressure gradient combined with radial pressure gradient due to convex curvature) on the structure of the turbulent boundary layer. The emphasis was on the initial region of curvature, which is relevant to the leading edge of a stator vane, for example. In order to gain better insight into the dynamics of complex turbulent boundary layers, detailed velocity measurements were made in a low-speed water tunnel using a two-component laser Doppler velocimeter. The mean and fluctuating velocity profiles showed that the influence of the strong favorable pressure augmented the stabilizing effects of convex curvature. The trends exhibited by the primary Reynolds shear stress followed those of the mean turbulent bursting frequency, i.e., a decrease in the bursting frequency coincided with a reduction of the peak Reynolds shear stress. It was found that the effects of these two strain rates were not superposable, or additive in any simple manner. Thus, the dynamics of the large energy-containing eddies and their interaction with the turbulence production mechanisms must be considered for modeling turbulent flows with multiple strain rates.

Theoretical evaluation of the Reynolds shear stress and flow parameters in transitionally rough turbulent boundary Layers

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. N5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Brzek ◽  
Jorge Bailon-Cuba ◽  
Stefano Leonardi ◽  
Luciano Castillo
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Theoretical Evaluation ◽  
Flow Parameters

The log behaviour of the Reynolds shear stress in accelerating turbulent boundary layers

2015 ◽  
Vol 775 ◽  
pp. 189-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Araya ◽  
Luciano Castillo ◽  
Fazle Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Direct Numerical Simulation ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Numerical Data ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Small Power ◽  
Streamwise Distance

Direct numerical simulation of highly accelerated turbulent boundary layers (TBLs) reveals that the Reynolds shear stress,$\overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}^{+}$, monotonically decreases downstream and exhibits a logarithmic behaviour (e.g. $-\overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}^{+}=-(1/A_{uv})\ln y^{+}+B_{uv}$) in the mesolayer region (e.g. $50\leqslant y^{+}\leqslant 170$). The thickness of the log layer of$\overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}^{+}$increases with the streamwise distance and with the pressure gradient strength, extending over a large portion of the TBL thickness (up to 55 %). Simulations reveal that$V^{+}\,\partial U^{+}/\partial y^{+}\sim 1/y^{+}\sim \partial \overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}^{+}/\partial y^{+}$, resulting in a logarithmic$\overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}^{+}$profile. Also,$V^{+}\sim -y^{+}$is no longer negligible as in zero-pressure-gradient (ZPG) flows. Other experimental/numerical data at similar favourable-pressure-gradient (FPG) strengths also show the presence of a log region in$\overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}^{+}$. This log region in$\overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}^{+}$is larger in sink flows than in other spatially developing FPG flows. The latter flows exhibit the presence of a small power-law region in$\overline{u^{\prime }v^{\prime }}^{+}$, which is non-existent in sink flows.

scholarly journals The Effects of Adverse Pressure Gradients on Momentum and Thermal Structures in Transitional Boundary Layers: Part 2 — Fluctuation Quantities

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott P. Mislevy ◽  
Ting Wang
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Transition Region ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Shear ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Pressure Gradients ◽  
Baseline Case ◽  
Near Wall

The effects of adverse pressure gradients on the thermal and momentum characteristics of a heated transitional boundary layer were investigated with free-stream turbulence ranging from 0.3 to 0.6%. Boundary layer measurements were conducted for two constant K cases, K1=−0.51 × 10−6 and K2=−1.05 × 10−6. The fluctuation quantities, u′, v′, t′, the Reynolds shear stress (uv¯), and the Reynolds heat fluxes (vt¯ and ut¯) were measured. In general, u′/U∞, v′/U∞, and vt¯ have higher values across the boundary layer for the adverse pressure-gradient cases than they do for the baseline case (K=0). The development of v′ for the adverse pressure gradients was more actively involved than that of the baseline. In the early transition region, the Reynolds shear stress distribution for the K2 case showed a near-wall region of high-turbulent shear generated at Y+=7. At stations farther downstream, this near-wall shear reduced in magnitude, while a second region of high-turbulent shear developed at Y+=70. For the baseline case, however, the maximum turbulent shear in the transition region was generated at Y+=70, and no near-wall high-shear region was seen. Stronger adverse pressure gradients appear to produce more uniform and higher t′ in the near-wall region (Y,+<20) in both transitional and turbulent boundary layers. The instantaneous velocity signals did not show any clear turbulent/non-turbulent demarcations in the transition region. Increasingly stronger adverse pressure gradients seemed to produce large non-turbulent unsteadiness (or instability waves) at a similar magnitude as the turbulent fluctuations such that the production of turbulent spots was obscured. The turbulent spots could not be identified visually or through conventional conditional-sampling schemes. In addition, the streamwise evolution of eddy viscosity, turbulent thermal diffusivity, and Prt are also presented.

Turbulent boundary layers at moderate Reynolds numbers: inflow length and tripping effects

2012 ◽  
Vol 710 ◽  
pp. 5-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Schlatter ◽  
Ramis Örlü
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Reynolds Numbers ◽  
Normal Velocity ◽  
Low Reynolds ◽  
Inflow Conditions

AbstractA recent assessment of available direct numerical simulation (DNS) data from turbulent boundary layer flows (Schlatter & Örlü,J. Fluid Mech., vol. 659, 2010, pp. 116–126) showed surprisingly large differences not only in the skin friction coefficient or shape factor, but also in their predictions of mean and fluctuation profiles far into the sublayer. While such differences are expected at very low Reynolds numbers and/or the immediate vicinity of the inflow or tripping region, it remains unclear whether inflow and tripping effects explain the differences observed even at moderate Reynolds numbers. This question is systematically addressed by re-simulating the DNS of a zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flow by Schlatteret al. (Phys. Fluids, vol. 21, 2009, art. 051702). The previous DNS serves as the baseline simulation, and the new DNS with a range of physically different inflow conditions and tripping effects are carefully compared. The downstream evolution of integral quantities as well as mean and fluctuation profiles is analysed, and the results show that different inflow conditions and tripping effects do indeed explain most of the differences observed when comparing available DNS at low Reynolds number. It is further found that, if transition is initiated inside the boundary layer at a low enough Reynolds number (based on the momentum-loss thickness)${\mathit{Re}}_{\theta } \lt 300$, all quantities agree well for both inner and outer layer for${\mathit{Re}}_{\theta } \gt 2000$. This result gives a lower limit for meaningful comparisons between numerical and/or wind tunnel experiments, assuming that the flow was not severely over- or understimulated. It is further shown that even profiles of the wall-normal velocity fluctuations and Reynolds shear stress collapse for higher${\mathit{Re}}_{\theta } $irrespective of the upstream conditions. In addition, the overshoot in the total shear stress within the sublayer observed in the DNS of Wu & Moin (Phys. Fluids, vol. 22, 2010, art. 085105) has been identified as a feature of transitional boundary layers.

Calculation of unsteady two-dimensional laminar and turbulent boundary layers with fluctuations in external velocity

1977 ◽  
Vol 355 (1681) ◽  
pp. 225-238 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Boundary Layers ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Reynolds Shear Stress ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Analytic Solutions ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layers ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Boundary Layer Equations

A numerical method is presented for calculating unsteady two-dimensional laminar and turbulent boundary layers with fluctuations in external velocity. The method used an eddy-viscosity formulation to model the Reynolds shear stress term appropriate to turbulent flow and an efficient two-point finite-difference method to solve the governing boundary-layer equations. The method is used to calculate phase angles between the wall shear stress and an oscillating external laminar boundary layer over a flat plate. The results are in excellent agreement with the analytic solutions of Lighthill for the high- and low-frequency limits and provide information in the region between. Similar calculations for turbulent flows are compared with experimental data and the method shown to be more precise than previously described attempts to represent flows of this type. The agreement between calculations and measurements is imperfect but probably within the resolution of the experiments and adequate for engineering purposes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document