The effect of standard care, ibuprofen, and music on pain relief and patient satisfaction in adults with musculoskeletal trauma

2001 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Tanabe ◽  
Ronald Thomas ◽  
Judith Paice ◽  
Mary Spiller ◽  
Richard Marcantonio
2002 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Tanabe ◽  
Kathleen Ferket ◽  
Ronald Thomas ◽  
Judith Paice ◽  
Richard Marcantonio

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (21;1) ◽  
pp. E501-E508
Author(s):  
Haitham Hamdy Salem

Background: Percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis and neuroplasty (PEAN) has been proven to be safe and effective in treating different spine pathologies, in particular post lumbar surgery syndrome (PLSS). Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and complication rates of the 3 different PEAN anatomical approaches (caudal, S1 foraminal, and L5-S1 transforaminal) used to treat PLSS. Study Design: This study used a case control, blind study. Setting: The research took place at the pain clinic and interventional pain practice room at Asyut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt. Methods: Sixty consecutive PLSS patients were recruited and randomized into 3 groups (caudal, S1 foraminal, and L5-S1 transforaminal) before receiving adhesiolysis and neuroplasty. All patients underwent nerve conduction studies and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Pain severity levels were assessed and measured using the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (OSW) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a Likert scale. The first assessment was performed prior to the procedure to determine the patients’ baseline levels of pain severity. Followup assessments were performed 1-, 3-, and 6-months after the procedure. Results: Results of the group pairwise analysis indicated that, relative to baseline, there were significant decreases in pain relief scores (VAS and OWS) and functional assessment expressed by patients’ satisfaction across all time intervals and in all 3 groups (P < 0.01). Conversely, a between group analysis revealed that VAS, OWS, and patient satisfaction scores were comparable across the 3 groups at all time intervals (P > 0.05). There were no differences in rates of complications between the 3 different groups. Limitations: Our study was limited by the low number of patients and the short duration (6 months) of follow-up. Conclusion: The 3 anatomical approaches (caudal, S1 foraminal, and L5-S1 transforaminal) result in the same outcome with regard to pain relief and complication rate. Key words: Post lumber surgery syndrome, post laminectomy back pain, percutaneous adhesiolysis, Racz catheter, percutaneous neuroplasty


Pain medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 67-70
Author(s):  
Yevhenii Grizhimalsky ◽  
Andrii Harha

Labour pain is recognized by some women as the most severe pain that they have ever felt in their life. Epidural analgesia is an effective method of pain relief in labour and is considered as the gold standard of analgesia for delivery. Traditionally, epidural analgesia in Ukraine is performed without the ability for the patient to control the process of anesthesia. The authors became interested in the delivery of local anesthetics by patient­controlled epidural analgesia instead of the traditional physician methods. In randomized controlled studies there is an evidence that the PCEA method tends to improve the quality of pain relief and increase the patient satisfaction.


Author(s):  
Nilmini Wickramasinghe ◽  
Louise O'Connor ◽  
Jeremy Grummet

For patients undergoing surgery in a multi-day admission, standard care requires that their surgeon review the patient post-operatively to check on their progress. This is usually done by the specialist attending in person. However, in the Australian setting, most specialists work at multiple institutions. As a result, review ward rounds, especially of post-operative patients, can be delayed, which can delay management decisions and discharge, which in turn may lower patient satisfaction. A telemedicine solution is designed, and results from a pilot test are examined to assess the benefits of incorporating an electronic discharge capability into the current process.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Neha Singh ◽  
Parnandi Bhaskar Rao ◽  
Anirudh Elayat

Aim: Laparoscopic procedures are now preferred over open surgeries, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy is becoming increasingly popular. Quadratus lumborum (QL) block is an evolving technique for abdominal surgeries that blocks T5–L1 nerve branches. Methods: We used a combination of anterior and posterior QL block given bilaterally in two patients and evaluated perioperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain score and patient satisfaction. Results: There was reduced perioperative opioid consumption along with postoperative visual analog scale for pain over the first 24 h. Both patients appreciated the level and standard of pain relief. Conclusion: QL block is promising as a part of multimodal analgesia for laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. Further studies are needed to determine the best possible combination of different approaches to QL block.


1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 707-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. RÜTHER ◽  
B. VERHESTRAETEN ◽  
B. FINK ◽  
K. TILLMANN

In a retrospective study of resection arthroplasty of the MP joints in rheumatoid arthritis, 23 patients (32 hands, 128 joints) have been followed for 15 to 22 years. Patient satisfaction was high, and all patients had significant pain relief. Active motion of the joints averaged 35°, ranging from full extension to 35° of flexion. Ankyloses developed in five hands (13 joints, 10%). Ulnar deviation of more than 15° occurred in six patients (ten hands, 30%). Over the course of several years a significant remodelling of the joints was to be observed. In six hands (19%) the metacarpal heads became spontaneously restored to ball-shaped geometry. Gross metacarpal resorption was observed in nine hands (30%), causing significant shortening of the metacarpals. In one-third of patients the final result was rated as good, fair and poor, respectively. Careful patient selection is mandatory. Patients with mutilating arthritis should be excluded from the procedure; rheumatoid destruction of the wrist joint definitely influences the final result.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document