Exorcising the Double-Nail Illusion: Giving up the Ghost

Perception ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 753-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Ono

The principles of visual direction explain the double-nail illusion, without the concept of a ghost image. Also, the stimulus arrangement for the illusion is not perceptually ambiguous for the visual system as Krol and van de Grind claim.

Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
M S Banks ◽  
R van Ee ◽  
B T Backus

Hering's laws imply that the visual direction assigned to a binocularly visible object is based on the oculocentric positions of the object in both eyes; the direction assigned to a monocularly visible object is based on its oculocentric position in that eye. It is interesting to consider how these laws apply near an occluder. Near the vertical edge of an opaque occluder, some regions of a far surface are visible to one eye only and other regions are visible to both eyes; the demarcation is created by the edge of the occluder and depends on the distance to the occluder and the far surface. If Hering's laws applied in this situation, we would expect spatial discontinuities in perceived visual directions near the edge of the occluder: in the monocular zone, the assignment of direction would be made by one eye's image and in the binocular zone, right next to the monocular zone, the assignment would be made by both eyes' images. Because of this switch in the eyes controlling the assignment, spatial discontinuities in perceived direction are expected. We measured perceived visual direction near an occluding edge and found spatial distortions, but no discontinuities. We measured the horizontal and vertical spatial extents of the distortions and inferred how the inputs to the two eyes are weighted when one eye's view is occluded, nearly occluded, and not nearly occluded. In conclusion, the visual system seems to avoid spatial discontinuities in perceived visual direction that could otherwise occur near an occluder by varying the weights attached to each eye's input depending on target position relative to the occluding edge.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samson Chengetanai ◽  
Adhil Bhagwandin ◽  
Mads F. Bertelsen ◽  
Therese Hård ◽  
Patrick R. Hof ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Klaus-Ruediger Peters

Differential hysteresis processing is a new image processing technology that provides a tool for the display of image data information at any level of differential contrast resolution. This includes the maximum contrast resolution of the acquisition system which may be 1,000-times higher than that of the visual system (16 bit versus 6 bit). All microscopes acquire high precision contrasts at a level of <0.01-25% of the acquisition range in 16-bit - 8-bit data, but these contrasts are mostly invisible or only partially visible even in conventionally enhanced images. The processing principle of the differential hysteresis tool is based on hysteresis properties of intensity variations within an image.Differential hysteresis image processing moves a cursor of selected intensity range (hysteresis range) along lines through the image data reading each successive pixel intensity. The midpoint of the cursor provides the output data. If the intensity value of the following pixel falls outside of the actual cursor endpoint values, then the cursor follows the data either with its top or with its bottom, but if the pixels' intensity value falls within the cursor range, then the cursor maintains its intensity value.


1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Umiltà ◽  
Francesca Simion ◽  
Eloisa Valenza

Four experiments were aimed at elucidating some aspects of the preference for facelike patterns in newborns. Experiment 1 showed a preference for a stimulus whose components were located in the correct arrangement for a human face. Experiment 2 showed a preference for stimuli that had optimal sensory properties for the newborn visual system. Experiment 3 showed that babies directed their attention to a facelike pattern even when it was presented simultaneously with a non-facelike stimulus with optimal sensory properties. Experiment 4 showed the preference for facelike patterns in the temporal hemifield but not in the nasal hemifield. It was concluded that newborns' preference for facelike patterns reflects the activity of a subcortical system which is sensitive to the structural properties of the stimulus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document