Emergence of serranid pigment abnormality syndrome (SPAS) in wire netting cod (Epinephelus quoyanus) from Heron Island on the southern Great Barrier Reef

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 1201
Author(s):  
B. K. Diggles ◽  
I. Ernst ◽  
S. Wesche
Keyword(s):  
Great Barrier Reef ◽  
Anthropogenic Impacts ◽  
Skin Lesions ◽  
Barrier Reef ◽  
Course Of Disease ◽  
Coral Trout ◽  
Lower Jaw ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Causative Factors ◽  
Abnormal Pigmentation

Coral reefs worldwide are under increasing stress from anthropogenic impacts, but there are relatively few reports of increased rates of disease in coral reef fish. Herein we report the emergence of abnormal skin lesions in wild-caught wire netting cod (Epinephelus quoyanus) near Heron Island in the southern Great Barrier Reef. The lesion involves conspicuous darkening and disorganisation of the brown ‘wire netting’ colouration pattern typical of this species, most commonly on the lower jaw, premaxilla and head, with occasional involvement of the flanks and dorsal fin in some fish. The lesion was not present during research conducted in the mid-1990s; however, since it was first recorded in 2012, the prevalence of grossly visible lesions has increased to 16.9% in 2017, with fish >340mm long most affected (prevalence 64.7%). These data suggest emergence of the lesion is a recent phenomenon and that causative factors may be age related. Abnormal pigmentation lesions have only been observed to affect E. quoyanus and coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus; since 2010). Given the species affected and the currently unknown aetiology of these lesions, we name the condition serranid pigment abnormality syndrome (SPAS). Further research is required to determine its geographic distribution, establish causation and describe the course of disease in E. quoyanus.

A new species of Stephanostomum Looss, 1899 (Digenea, Acanthocolpidae) with a bizarre oral sucker: S. adlardi sp. nov. from the common coral trout Plectropomus leopardus (Lacepède, 1802) (Perciformes, Serranidae) from Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef

2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney Bray ◽  
Thomas Cribb ◽  
Andrea Waeschenbach ◽  
D. Littlewood
Keyword(s):  
New Species ◽  
Great Barrier Reef ◽  
Oral Sucker ◽  
Ribosomal Rna ◽  
Barrier Reef ◽  
Coral Trout ◽  
Lizard Island ◽  
The Common ◽  
Plectropomus Leopardus ◽  
A New Species

AbstractA new species of Acanthocolpidae, Stephanostomum adlardi is described from the serranid Plectropomus leopardus from Lizard Island in the northern Great Barrier Reef. It differs from all previously described acanthocolpids in the structure of the oral sucker which is extended into dorsal and ventral lobes each bearing a row of spines. A phylogenetic tree estimated from combined nuclear small and partial large ribosomal RNA gene sequences shows that, despite the unusual oral sucker structure, the species is a true member of the genus Stephanostomum. The molecular results also suggest that Monostephanostomum nolani is derived from within Stephanostomum.

Population estimates and size structure of Plectropomus leopardus (Pisces : Serranidae) in relation to no-fishing zones: mark-release-resighting and underwater visual census

2000 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 221 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Zeller ◽  
G. R. Russ
Keyword(s):  
Great Barrier Reef ◽  
Population Size ◽  
Size Structure ◽  
Barrier Reef ◽  
Visual Census ◽  
Underwater Visual Census ◽  
Coral Trout ◽  
Population Size Estimates ◽  
Lizard Island ◽  
Plectropomus Leopardus

A mark–release–resighting (MRR) technique was used to estimate population size of the coral trout, Plectropomus leopardus, on coral reefs fringing Lizard Island, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Fish were captured by hook-and-line fishing, and marked with individual freeze-brand numbers in August 1995. An underwater visual census (UVC) technique was used during September and October 1995 both for resighting of marked fish and to make an independent estimate of fish density and thus population size. The study area was 750 966 m2 . The UVC sampled 154 000 m2 (20.5%) of this area. Six different methods of analysis of MRR gave similar population size estimates (e.g. Petersen 12 873; 95% CI 9989–15 754) extrapolated to the 4.5 million-m2 reef area from datum to 20-m depth around Lizard Island. UVC gave a population size estimate (24 182; 95% CI 21 860–26 504) twice that of MRR. The lower estimate derived from MRR may be the result of tag-induced mortality, or of the relative difficulty in discriminating between marked and unmarked trout by UVC. This is only the second estimate of population size of coral trout on an area of the Great Barrier Reef.

scholarly journals Exploring the effect of sampling, protogyny, and larval advection on stock estimates subject to no-take closures in a spatially complex coral reef line fishery on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia

2017 ◽  
Vol 74 (11) ◽  
pp. 1950-1959 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Richard Little ◽  
André E. Punt ◽  
Geoffrey N. Tuck ◽  
Bruce D. Mapstone
Keyword(s):  
Great Barrier Reef ◽  
Simulated Data ◽  
Breeding Strategy ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Fish Stock ◽  
Barrier Reef ◽  
Stock Status ◽  
Coral Trout ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Spawning Biomass

Simulation is used to evaluate the ability of a two-region, age-structured assessment model to provide accurate and precise estimates of stock status (i.e., the ratio of female spawning biomass to unfished female spawning biomass) for coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus) on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia. The model used to generate the simulated data used by the assessment model is a spatially complex age- and sex-structured population dynamics model that captures the protogynous nature of coral trout. Stock status is underestimated (negatively biased), with the extent of negative bias related to mis-specification of the breeding strategy of the target fish stock, the impact of the amount of larval connectivity among reefs, the number of reefs closed to fishing, as well as exploitation rates. The estimates of stock status were less negatively biased when fishery-independent index and age- and length-composition data were available from closed areas. The results will inform the development of management strategies for coral trout in the GBR and highlight the importance of basing evaluations of estimation and management performance on operating models that capture ecologically important processes such as metapopulation dynamics and protogynous life history.

No-take marine reserves increase abundance and biomass of reef fish on inshore fringing reefs of the Great Barrier Reef

2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.H. WILLIAMSON ◽  
G.R. RUSS ◽  
A.M. AYLING
Keyword(s):  
Great Barrier Reef ◽  
Size Structure ◽  
Marine Reserve ◽  
Barrier Reef ◽  
Coral Trout ◽  
Quantitative Estimates ◽  
Fringing Reefs ◽  
Lutjanus Carponotatus ◽  
Average Size ◽  
Density And Biomass

The application of no-take marine reserve status to an area is expected to increase abundance and average size of individuals of species targeted by fisheries. The majority of the evidence supporting such expectations still involves comparisons of abundance at the one time of sites with and without marine reserve protection. Very few studies have data on the abundance and size structure of species targeted by fisheries in an area before reserve status is applied. Quantitative estimates of density and biomass of coral trout, Plectropomus spp., the major target of the hook and line fisheries on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia, on inshore fringing reefs of the Palm and Whitsunday Island groups, central GBR, are provided for 3–4 years before (1983–1984), and 12–13 years after (1999–2000) the establishment of no-take reserves in 1987. Quantitative estimates of density and biomass of coral trout in areas open to fishing were also collected in 1999–2000 at these two island groups. Density and biomass of coral trout increased significantly (by factors of 5.9 and 6.3 in the Palm Islands, and 4.0 and 6.2 in the Whitsunday Islands) in the reserve sites, but not the fished sites, between 1983–1984 and 1999–2000. In 1999–2000, density and biomass of coral trout and a secondary target of the fisheries, Lutjanus carponotatus, were significantly higher in the protected zones than in the fished zones at both island groups. The density and biomass of non-target fish species (Labridae, Siganidae and Chaetodontidae) did not differ significantly between reserve and fished zones at either island group. This is the most convincing data to date that the management zoning of the world's largest marine park has been effective, at least for coral trout on inshore reefs.

Mortality rate of a cohort of the coral trout, Plectropomus leopardus, in zones of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park closed to fishing

1998 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garry R. Russ ◽  
Dong C. Lou ◽  
James B. Higgs ◽  
Beatrice P. Ferreira
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Great Barrier Reef ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Barrier Reef ◽  
Coral Trout ◽  
Marine Park ◽  
Plectropomus Leopardus ◽  
Catch Rates ◽  
Small Sample Sizes ◽  
Annual Mortality

From 1990 to 1993, samples of coral trout, Plectropomus leopardus, were collected at two coral reefs closed to fishing since 1987 in the central Great Barrier Reef (GBR). The age structure was dominated by a strong cohort which settled in early 1984 and which accounted for 54%, 45%, 42% and 36% of the experimental hook-and-line catches at Glow and Yankee reefs. Catch rates (fish person-1 hour-1) per age class per reef per year provide the first reliable estimates of the exponential rate of mortality of coral trout in zones of the GBR Marine Park closed to fishing. The annual mortality rate between the ages of 6 and 9 years was 0.115 (s.e. 0.040) at Glow reef and 0.189 (s.e. 0.100) at Yankee reef. The annual mortality rate between ages 6 and 9 years was 0.147 (s.e. 0.028) at the two reefs combined. Age-specific estimates of annual mortality ranged from 0.024 (age 7–8 at Glow) to 0.442 (age 6–7 at Yankee) but were unreliable because of small sample sizes. This is one of the first estimates of mortality rate of an exploited species in an area closed to fishing in the tropics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document