Influence of burning intensity on water repellency and hydrological processes at forest and shrub sites in Portugal

Soil Research ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 327 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. D. Ferreira ◽  
C. O. A. Coelho ◽  
A. K. Boulet ◽  
G. Leighton-Boyce ◽  
J. J. Keizer ◽  
...  

In addition to the incineration of vegetation and litter layer, fires are also responsible for the formation of a water repellent layer with significantly different severity and spatial distribution patterns following different burning intensities. Those spatial distribution patterns have an enormous influence on soil wetting patterns, and on hydrological processes at different scales. This study attempts to understand the role of water repellence severity and spatial distribution patterns on soil, slope, and catchment water processes, and on the transmission of hydrological processes between different scales. The comparison between microplot (0.24 m2), plot (16 m2), and catchment (<1.2 km2) scales shows that water repellence spatial homogeneity enhances water fluxes transfer between the different scales. In fact, the more intense the fires, the more severe and spatially uniform the soil water repellency became. For burned areas with heterogeneous soil water repellency, overland flow produced in water repellent patches infiltrated downslope at hydrophilic sites, thereby reducing superficial water fluxes at wider scales. For the more severe and homogeneous water repellent areas following forest wildfires, overland flow was enhanced downslope, increasing fast superficial water fluxes at wider scales.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Abayomi Ogunmokun ◽  
Rony Wallach

&lt;p&gt;Soil water repellency is a common feature of dry soils under permanent vegetation and drought conditions. Soil-water hydrology is markedly affected by soil-water repellency as it hinders infiltration, leading to enhanced surface runoff and soil erosion. Although this phenomenon was primarily ascribed to sandy soils, it has been observed in loam, clay, and peat soils in dry and humid regions. One detrimental effect of soil water repellency on plants is the reduction of soil water availability that stems from the non-uniform water retention and flow in preferential pathways (gravity-induced fingers) with relatively dry soil volume among these paths. It was recently discovered that prolonged irrigation with treated wastewater, a widely used alternative in Israel and other Mediterranean countries due to the limited freshwater, triggers soil water repellency which invariably resulted in preferential flow development in the field. Due to climate change events, the use of treated wastewater for irrigation as a means of freshwater conservation is expected to widen, including in countries that are not considered dry.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While a vast amount of research has been devoted to characterizing the preferential flow in water repellent soils, the effect of this flow regime on the spatial distribution of salt and fertilizers in the root zone was barely investigated. Results from a commercial citrus orchard irrigated with treated wastewater that includes the spatial and temporal distribution of preferential flow in the soil profile measured by ERT will be demonstrated. The associated spatial distribution of salinity, nitrate, phosphate, and SAR in the soil profile will be shown as well.&amp;#160; We investigated the efficacy of two nonionic surfactants application to remediate hydrophobic sandy soils both in the laboratory and field. The effect of the surfactant application to the water repellent soils in the orchards on the spatial distribution of soil moisture and the associated agrochemicals will be presented and discussed.&lt;/p&gt;


1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. S. Henderson ◽  
D. L. Golding

Soil from 10 slash burned and 3 unburned clear-cuts was tested for water repellency by the water drop penetration method and compared with naturally occurring soil water repellency in uncut mature forest. There was no difference in soil water repellency between unburned clear-cuts and the uncut forest control. Soil was more frequently water repellent in slash burned sites (35% of samples) than in the control sites (21% of samples), but differences were significant only for the first 2 years after burning. All humus samples were severely water repellent. At the 0- to 4-cm depth below the humus, burned samples were more frequently repellent than control samples, but there was no difference at the 8- to 10-cm and 15+ cm depths. Water repellence decreased with depth in both burned and control sites.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document