The effect of slash burning on the water repellency of forest soils at Vancouver, British Columbia
Soil from 10 slash burned and 3 unburned clear-cuts was tested for water repellency by the water drop penetration method and compared with naturally occurring soil water repellency in uncut mature forest. There was no difference in soil water repellency between unburned clear-cuts and the uncut forest control. Soil was more frequently water repellent in slash burned sites (35% of samples) than in the control sites (21% of samples), but differences were significant only for the first 2 years after burning. All humus samples were severely water repellent. At the 0- to 4-cm depth below the humus, burned samples were more frequently repellent than control samples, but there was no difference at the 8- to 10-cm and 15+ cm depths. Water repellence decreased with depth in both burned and control sites.