Hardsetting soils: a review

Soil Research ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian G. Daniells

Hardsetting soils have been defined as soils that set to a hard, structureless mass during drying and are thereafter difficult or impossible to cultivate until the profile is rewetted. Soil strength increases rapidly as the soil dries, and so seedlings must grow quickly before soil strength becomes too high for root growth or shoot emergence. Recent work on the mechanisms of hardsetting confirms that aggregate disruption through slaking and dispersion on wetting leads to coalescence. Bridging by dispersed particles under matric potential makes a soil hardset. Failure to recover from a coalesced state as the soil dries leaves it with a massive structure. This paper reviews the worldwide occurrence of hardsetting soils, the evolution of definitions of hardsetting, and the use of those definitions in soil classification with particular emphasis on Australia. Measurement of hardsetting includes methods such as visual score of slaking and dispersion, penetration resistance, fall-cone penetration, dispersion, fractions of soil organic matter, friability index, modulus of rupture, and a particular use of the soil water retention curve. Overcoming problems associated with hardsetting soils and their ongoing management is difficult. Further work is needed on the reasons for variable responses to tillage, no tillage, and pasture. Modifying soil texture has limited application, and increasing soil organic matter under cropping is difficult in low-rainfall areas. Polymers have been shown to be beneficial. Mulching maintains higher soil moisture and therefore a softer surface, while biochar shows inconsistent effects. Controlled traffic is a key to reducing recompaction. Management of a hardsetting soil must include the whole rotation, including when to till, when to crop, and when to graze or not.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teamrat Ghezzehei ◽  
Jennifer Alvarez ◽  
Yocelyn Villa ◽  
Rebecca Ryals

<p>The dynamics of soil organic matter is strongly controlled by the hydrophysical environmental factors, including motility, aqueous diffusivity of substrates, gaseous diffusivity, and energetic constraints on microbial physiology. The relationships among these physical factors depend on soil moisture and the architecture of the soil pores. In this regard, the soil water retention curve can serve as a macroscopic signature of pore-size distribution. Therefore, the sensitivity of aerobic and anaerobic microbial activity must be closely associated with the shape of the soil water retention curve. The soil water retention curve is, in turn, strongly dependent on soil texture and structure. Here, we present a physically-based model of aerobic and anaerobic microbial respiration rates. We also present a novel experimental technique for the characterization of the soil-moisture sensitivity of soil microbial activity. The proposed experimental and modeling approaches allow direct coupling of the fate soil organic matter with the nature of soil structure.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 869-877
Author(s):  
Vasile Lucian Pavel ◽  
Florian Statescu ◽  
Dorin Cotiu.ca-Zauca ◽  
Gabriela Biali ◽  
Paula Cojocaru

Pedosphere ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guan-Hua HUANG ◽  
Ren-Duo ZHANG ◽  
Quan-Zhong HUANG

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 730-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Carlos Medeiros ◽  
Miguel Cooper ◽  
Jaqueline Dalla Rosa ◽  
Michel Grimaldi ◽  
Yves Coquet

Knowledge of the soil water retention curve (SWRC) is essential for understanding and modeling hydraulic processes in the soil. However, direct determination of the SWRC is time consuming and costly. In addition, it requires a large number of samples, due to the high spatial and temporal variability of soil hydraulic properties. An alternative is the use of models, called pedotransfer functions (PTFs), which estimate the SWRC from easy-to-measure properties. The aim of this paper was to test the accuracy of 16 point or parametric PTFs reported in the literature on different soils from the south and southeast of the State of Pará, Brazil. The PTFs tested were proposed by Pidgeon (1972), Lal (1979), Aina & Periaswamy (1985), Arruda et al. (1987), Dijkerman (1988), Vereecken et al. (1989), Batjes (1996), van den Berg et al. (1997), Tomasella et al. (2000), Hodnett & Tomasella (2002), Oliveira et al. (2002), and Barros (2010). We used a database that includes soil texture (sand, silt, and clay), bulk density, soil organic carbon, soil pH, cation exchange capacity, and the SWRC. Most of the PTFs tested did not show good performance in estimating the SWRC. The parametric PTFs, however, performed better than the point PTFs in assessing the SWRC in the tested region. Among the parametric PTFs, those proposed by Tomasella et al. (2000) achieved the best accuracy in estimating the empirical parameters of the van Genuchten (1980) model, especially when tested in the top soil layer.


2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-213
Author(s):  
Luciana Portugal Menezes ◽  
Waldyr Lopes Oliveira Filho ◽  
Cláudio Henrique Carvalho Silva

AbstractReliable measurements of the Soil Water Retention Curve, SWRC, are necessary for solving unsaturated flow problems. In this sense, a method to obtain the SWRC of a silty sand using a flow pump, as well as details about procedures and some results, are herein presented. The overall conclusion is that the new method is very convenient, fully automated, and produces reliable results in a fast and easy way, making the technique very promising.


Author(s):  
Maria Laiane do Nascimento Silva ◽  
Paulo Leonel Libardi ◽  
Fernando Henrique Setti Gimenes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document