scholarly journals Canopy nitrogen, carbon assimilation, and albedo in temperate and boreal forests: Functional relations and potential climate feedbacks

2008 ◽  
Vol 105 (49) ◽  
pp. 19336-19341 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. V. Ollinger ◽  
A. D. Richardson ◽  
M. E. Martin ◽  
D. Y. Hollinger ◽  
S. E. Frolking ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1336-1346 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.S. Euskirchen ◽  
A.D. McGuire ◽  
F.S. Chapin ◽  
T.S. Rupp

In the boreal forests of Alaska, recent changes in climate have influenced the exchange of trace gases, water, and energy between these forests and the atmosphere. These changes in the structure and function of boreal forests can then feed back to impact regional and global climates. In this manuscript, we examine the type and magnitude of the climate feedbacks from boreal forests in Alaska. Research generally suggests that the net effect of a warming climate is a positive regional feedback to warming. Currently, the primary positive climate feedbacks are likely related to decreases in surface albedo due to decreases in snow cover. Fewer negative feedbacks have been identified, and they may not be large enough to counterbalance the large positive feedbacks. These positive feedbacks are most pronounced at the regional scale and reduce the resilience of the boreal vegetation – climate system by amplifying the rate of regional warming. Given the recent warming in this region, the large variety of associated mechanisms that can alter terrestrial ecosystems and influence the climate system, and a reduction in the boreal forest resilience, there is a strong need to continue to quantify and evaluate the feedback pathways.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daria Polosukhina ◽  
Oxana Masyagina ◽  
Anatoly Prokushkin

<p>In boreal forests, bryophytes and lichens usually dominate the ground floor layer and contribute up to 50% of ecosystem gross CO<sub>2</sub> exchange (Bisbee et al. 2001; Goulden & Crill 1997). Sphagnum spp. are the most important contributors in wetland C uptake, and feathermosses and lichens play a significant role in well-drained sites (Nilsson & Wardle 2005; O’Connell et al. 2003; Jarle W. Bjerke et al. 2013). Given their important ecological roles in such a widespread biome, it is surprising that still a few studies have attempted to understand the intrinsic factors that control moss-lichen cover carbon dynamics specifically under ongoing climate change in high latitudes.</p><p>The aim of this work was to determine the stocks of moss-lichen stratum and photoassimilation activity of its dominant species during the growing season. The study has been conducted in Central Siberia near Zotino tall tower observatory (ZOTTO, 60 ° N, 89 ° E) in lichen- and feathermoss-dominated pine forests. First, to assess the phyto (bio) mass stocks the grass-shrub and moss-lichen layers were sampled in 100 replicates in each type of forest from 20x25 cm subplots (S = 50 cm<sup>2</sup>). The intensity of CO<sub>2</sub> photoassimilation was determined in situ by Walz GFS-3000 (Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany) infrared gas analyzer. Photosynthetic activity of lichens and feathermosses was measured during the growing season of 2018 in June, July, August and September around the mid-day time. For every time point we also analyzed CO<sub>2 </sub>exchange dependence from temperature, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration.</p><p>The dominants of ground vegetation for the moss-lichen layer were <em>Cladonia stellaris</em>, C<em>ladonia rangiferina</em>, <em>Cetraria islandica</em>, <em>Pleurozium schreberi</em>, <em>Hylocomium splendens</em>, <em>Aulacomnium palustre</em>. The moss-lichen layer accounted for 78-96% of the total phytomass of ground floor in studied pine forests and comparable (486 g/m<sup>2</sup>) to the photosynthetic phytomass of the tree canopy (pine needles). During the growing season, carbon assimilation by the moss-lichen layer varied in a relatively narrow range: from 38 ± 4 to 42 ± 5 mgCO<sub>2</sub> / m<sup>2</sup> / hour for lichen <em>C. stellaris</em> and from 93 ± 11 to 99 ± 13 mgCO<sub>2</sub> / m<sup>2</sup> / hour for moss <em>P. schreberi</em>. Thus, moss-lichen layer dominants maintained high photoassimilation activity throughout the growing season. Temperature increased the intensity of CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation and no inhibition was observed at maximum T used in our study (+40 ° C). There were no differences in the temperature dependence of CO<sub>2</sub> photoassimilation between feathermosses and lichens. However, they differed in dependence from PAR. Mosses showed 2-fold larger response of CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation intensity to increase of PAR comparatively to lichens. The rate of photosynthesis of both moss and lichen showed log growth with increasing CO<sub>2</sub> levels up to 2000 ppm. Compensation poit was varying from 170 to 284  ppm.</p><p>This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research project  № 18-05-60203 "Landscape and hydrobiological controls on the transport of terrigenic carbon to the Arctic Ocean".</p>


Oecologia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 188 (2) ◽  
pp. 595-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaixing Zhou ◽  
Scott V. Ollinger ◽  
Lucie Lepine

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sander Veraverbeke ◽  
Clement Delcourt ◽  
Gustaf Granath ◽  
Elena Kukavskaya ◽  
Michelle Mack ◽  
...  

<p>Increases in arctic and boreal fires can switch these biomes from a long-term carbon (C) sink to a source through direct fire emissions and longer-term emissions from soil respiration. Landscapes of intermediate drainage tend to experience the highest C combustion, dominated by soil C emissions, because of relatively thick and periodically dry organic soils. These landscapes may also induce a climate warming feedback through combustion and post-fire respiration of legacy C – soil C that had escaped burning in the previous fire – including from permafrost thaw and degradation. Data shortages from fires in tundra ecosystems and Eurasian boreal forests limit our understanding of C emissions from arctic-boreal fires. Interactions between fire, topography, vegetation, soil and permafrost need to be considered when estimating climate feedbacks of arctic-boreal fires.</p>


2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen N. Haynes ◽  
Andrew E. Williams

Summary: We review the rationale for behavioral clinical case formulations and emphasize the role of the functional analysis in the design of individualized treatments. Standardized treatments may not be optimally effective for clients who have multiple behavior problems. These problems can affect each other in complex ways and each behavior problem can be influenced by multiple, interacting causal variables. The mechanisms of action of standardized treatments may not always address the most important causal variables for a client's behavior problems. The functional analysis integrates judgments about the client's behavior problems, important causal variables, and functional relations among variables. The functional analysis aids treatment decisions by helping the clinician estimate the relative magnitude of effect of each causal variable on the client's behavior problems, so that the most effective treatments can be selected. The parameters of, and issues associated with, a functional analysis and Functional Analytic Clinical Case Models (FACCM) are illustrated with a clinical case. The task of selecting the best treatment for a client is complicated because treatments differ in their level of specificity and have unequally weighted mechanisms of action. Further, a treatment's mechanism of action is often unknown.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document