scholarly journals Micron-scale coherence in interphase chromatin dynamics

2013 ◽  
Vol 110 (39) ◽  
pp. 15555-15560 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Zidovska ◽  
D. A. Weitz ◽  
T. J. Mitchison
2015 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 538a
Author(s):  
Takeshi Sugawara ◽  
Kenta Masuda ◽  
Jun-ichi Uewaki ◽  
Akinori Awazu ◽  
Hiraku Nishimori ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 374a
Author(s):  
Jonah Eaton ◽  
Alexandra Zidovska

1997 ◽  
Vol 137 (7) ◽  
pp. 1459-1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Abney ◽  
Bryan Cutler ◽  
Misty L. Fillbach ◽  
Daniel Axelrod ◽  
Bethe A. Scalettar

Translational dynamics of chromatin in interphase nuclei of living Swiss 3T3 and HeLa cells was studied using fluorescence microscopy and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Chromatin was fluorescently labeled using dihydroethidium, a membrane-permeant derivative of ethidium bromide. After labeling, a laser was used to bleach small (∼0.4 μm radius) spots in the heterochromatin and euchromatin of cells of both types. These spots were observed to persist for >1 h, implying that interphase chromatin is immobile over distance scales ⩾0.4 μm. Over very short times (<1 s), a partial fluorescence recovery within the spots was observed. This partial recovery is attributed to independent dye motion, based on comparison with results obtained using ethidium homodimer-1, which binds essentially irreversibly to nucleic acids. The immobility observed here is consistent with chromosome confinement to domains in interphase nuclei. This immobility may reflect motion-impeding steric interactions that arise in the highly concentrated nuclear milieu or outright attachment of the chromatin to underlying nuclear substructures, such as nucleoli, the nuclear lamina, or the nuclear matrix.


10.2741/1013 ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. s149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasily V Ogryzko

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 816
Author(s):  
Priya Ramarao-Milne ◽  
Olga Kondrashova ◽  
Sinead Barry ◽  
John D. Hooper ◽  
Jason S. Lee ◽  
...  

Genetic and epigenetic factors contribute to the development of cancer. Epigenetic dysregulation is common in gynaecological cancers and includes altered methylation at CpG islands in gene promoter regions, global demethylation that leads to genome instability and histone modifications. Histones are a major determinant of chromosomal conformation and stability, and unlike DNA methylation, which is generally associated with gene silencing, are amenable to post-translational modifications that induce facultative chromatin regions, or condensed transcriptionally silent regions that decondense resulting in global alteration of gene expression. In comparison, other components, crucial to the manipulation of chromatin dynamics, such as histone modifying enzymes, are not as well-studied. Inhibitors targeting DNA modifying enzymes, particularly histone modifying enzymes represent a potential cancer treatment. Due to the ability of epigenetic therapies to target multiple pathways simultaneously, tumours with complex mutational landscapes affected by multiple driver mutations may be most amenable to this type of inhibitor. Interrogation of the actionable landscape of different gynaecological cancer types has revealed that some patients have biomarkers which indicate potential sensitivity to epigenetic inhibitors. In this review we describe the role of epigenetics in gynaecological cancers and highlight how it may exploited for treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document