scholarly journals Enhanced Biosynthesis of Coagulation Factor VIII through Diminished Engagement of the Unfolded Protein Response

2011 ◽  
Vol 286 (27) ◽  
pp. 24451-24457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harrison C. Brown ◽  
Bagirath Gangadharan ◽  
Christopher B. Doering

Human and porcine coagulation factor VIII (fVIII) display a biosynthetic efficiency differential that is being exploited for the development of new protein and gene transfer-based therapies for hemophilia A. The cellular and/or molecular mechanism(s) responsible for this phenomenon have yet to be uncovered, although it has been temporally localized to post-translational biosynthetic steps. The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a cellular adaptation to structurally distinct (e.g. misfolded) or excess protein in the endoplasmic reticulum and is known to be induced by heterologous expression of recombinant human fVIII. Therefore, it is plausible that the biosynthetic differential between human and porcine fVIII results from differential UPR activation. In the current study, UPR induction was examined in the context of ongoing fVIII expression. UPR activation was greater during human fVIII expression when compared with porcine fVIII expression as determined by ER response element (ERSE)-luciferase reporter activity, X-box-binding protein 1 (XBP1) splicing, and immunoglobulin-binding protein (BiP) up-regulation. Immunofluorescence microscopy of fVIII expressing cells revealed that human fVIII was notably absent in the Golgi apparatus, confirming that endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport is rate-limiting. In contrast, a significant proportion of porcine fVIII was localized to the Golgi indicating efficient transit through the secretory pathway. Overexpression of BiP, an integral UPR protein, reduced the secretion of human fVIII by 50%, but had no effect on porcine fVIII biosynthesis. In contrast, expression of BiP shRNA increased human fVIII expression levels. The current data support the model of differential engagement of UPR by human and porcine fVIII as a non-traditional mechanism for regulation of gene product biosynthesis.

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1805-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
J S Cox ◽  
R E Chapman ◽  
P Walter

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a multifunctional organelle responsible for production of both lumenal and membrane components of secretory pathway compartments. Secretory proteins are folded, processed, and sorted in the ER lumen and lipid synthesis occurs on the ER membrane itself. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, synthesis of ER components is highly regulated: the ER-resident proteins by the unfolded protein response and membrane lipid synthesis by the inositol response. We demonstrate that these two responses are intimately linked, forming different branches of the same pathway. Furthermore, we present evidence indicating that this coordinate regulation plays a role in ER biogenesis.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 2437-2445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumen Kahali ◽  
Bhaswati Sarcar ◽  
Antony Prabhu ◽  
Edward Seto ◽  
Prakash Chinnaiyan

1998 ◽  
Vol 143 (4) ◽  
pp. 921-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susana Silberstein ◽  
Gabriel Schlenstedt ◽  
Pam A. Silver ◽  
Reid Gilmore

Members of the eukaryotic heat shock protein 70 family (Hsp70s) are regulated by protein cofactors that contain domains homologous to bacterial DnaJ. Of the three DnaJ homologues in the yeast rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER; Scj1p, Sec63p, and Jem1p), Scj1p is most closely related to DnaJ, hence it is a probable cofactor for Kar2p, the major Hsp70 in the yeast RER. However, the physiological role of Scj1p has remained obscure due to the lack of an obvious defect in Kar2p-mediated pathways in scj1 null mutants. Here, we show that the Δscj1 mutant is hypersensitive to tunicamycin or mutations that reduce N-linked glycosylation of proteins. Although maturation of glycosylated carboxypeptidase Y occurs with wild-type kinetics in Δscj1 cells, the transport rate for an unglycosylated mutant carboxypeptidase Y (CPY) is markedly reduced. Loss of Scj1p induces the unfolded protein response pathway, and results in a cell wall defect when combined with an oligosaccharyltransferase mutation. The combined loss of both Scj1p and Jem1p exaggerates the sensitivity to hypoglycosylation stress, leads to further induction of the unfolded protein response pathway, and drastically delays maturation of an unglycosylated reporter protein in the RER. We propose that the major role for Scj1p is to cooperate with Kar2p to mediate maturation of proteins in the RER lumen.


2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 7448-7459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann-Hwee Lee ◽  
Neal N. Iwakoshi ◽  
Laurie H. Glimcher

ABSTRACT The mammalian unfolded protein response (UPR) protects the cell against the stress of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We have investigated here the contribution of the UPR transcription factors XBP-1, ATF6α, and ATF6β to UPR target gene expression. Gene profiling of cell lines lacking these factors yielded several XBP-1-dependent UPR target genes, all of which appear to act in the ER. These included the DnaJ/Hsp40-like genes, p58IPK, ERdj4, and HEDJ, as well as EDEM, protein disulfide isomerase-P5, and ribosome-associated membrane protein 4 (RAMP4), whereas expression of BiP was only modestly dependent on XBP-1. Surprisingly, given previous reports that enforced expression of ATF6α induced a subset of UPR target genes, cells deficient in ATF6α, ATF6β, or both had minimal defects in upregulating UPR target genes by gene profiling analysis, suggesting the presence of compensatory mechanism(s) for ATF6 in the UPR. Since cells lacking both XBP-1 and ATF6α had significantly impaired induction of select UPR target genes and ERSE reporter activation, XBP-1 and ATF6α may serve partially redundant functions. No UPR target genes that required ATF6β were identified, nor, in contrast to XBP-1 and ATF6α, did the activity of the UPRE or ERSE promoters require ATF6β, suggesting a minor role for it during the UPR. Collectively, these results suggest that the IRE1/XBP-1 pathway is required for efficient protein folding, maturation, and degradation in the ER and imply the existence of subsets of UPR target genes as defined by their dependence on XBP-1. Further, our observations suggest the existence of additional, as-yet-unknown, key regulators of the UPR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document