Accelerating forage crop production.

Author(s):  
R. S. Paroda
Keyword(s):  
1978 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Reginato ◽  
Sherwood B. Idso ◽  
Ray D. Jackson

Soil Research ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 778
Author(s):  
G. S. A. Castro ◽  
C. A. C. Crusciol ◽  
C. A. Rosolem ◽  
J. C. Calonego ◽  
K. R. Brye

This work aimed to evaluate the effects of crop rotations and soil acidity amelioration on soil physical properties of an Oxisol (Rhodic Ferralsol or Red Ferrosol in the Australian Soil Classification) from October 2006 to September 2011 in Botucatu, SP, Brazil. Treatments consisted of four soybean (Glycine max)–maize (Zea mays)–rice (Oryza sativa) rotations that differed in their off-season crop, either a signal grass (Urochloa ruziziensis) forage crop, a second crop, a cover crop, or fallow. Two acid-neutralising materials, dolomitic lime (effective calcium carbonate equivalent (ECCE) = 90%) and calcium-magnesium silicate (ECCE = 80%), were surface applied to raise the soil’s base saturation to 70%. Selected soil physical characteristics were evaluated at three depths (0–0.1, 0.1–0.2, and 0.2–0.4 m). In the top 0.1 m, soil bulk density was lowest (P < 0.05) and macroporosity and aggregate stability index were greatest (P < 0.05) in the forage crop compared with all other production systems. Also, bulk density was lower (P < 0.05) and macroporosity was greater (P < 0.05) in the acid-neutralising-amended than the unamended control soil. In the 0.1–0.2-m interval, mean weight diameter and mean geometric diameter were greater (P < 0.05) in the forage crop compared with all other production systems. All soil properties evaluated in this study in the 0.2–0.4-m interval were unaffected by production system or soil amendment after five complete cropping cycles. Results of this study demonstrated that certain soil physical properties can be improved in a no-tillage soybean–maize–rice rotation using a forage crop in the off-season and with the addition of acid-neutralising soil amendments. Any soil and crop management practices that improve soil physical properties will likely contribute to sustaining long-term soil and crop productivity in areas with highly weathered, organic matter-depleted, acidic Oxisols.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (sup2) ◽  
pp. 1226-1229 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Martiniello ◽  
G. Gesualdo ◽  
E. Sabia ◽  
G.M. Terzano ◽  
C. Pacelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 289 ◽  
pp. 106733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Hu ◽  
Mike Beare ◽  
Craig Tregurtha ◽  
Richard Gillespie ◽  
Kathryn Lehto ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Duguma Dibbisa Itana ◽  
Ararsa Duguma

The purpose of the study is to examine the role and impacts of growth hormone in maximizing animal products. Growth hormones are biological stimulants that are found either naturally in the organism or synthetically manufactured. Phytoestrogens, phytoprogestrons and Phenolic compounds are hormones from plants. Drugs from of placenta and colostrums of cow`s contain progesterone, estrogene, gonadotropin, and prostaglandins hormones. Growth hormones have got popular applications in dairy, beef, feed improvement and Biopharmaceutical productions with the aim of producing valuable products: fat free meat (Porcine Somatotropin hormone in pigs), nutritionally and medicinally reach milk (Bovine Somatotropin hormone in cattle), palatable and disease and insect pest resistant forage crop production. They have got also contribution in maximizing livestock production by involving in adjusting animals’ reproductive process such as oestrus synchronization and superovulation mainly during artificial insemination and embryo transfer. Controversially, these hormones have wide impacts on human being, animal welfare, environment and etc. Contamination of ground water by hormones that are found in the animals` excreta will cause deleterious effects such as cancer, loss of fertility, and some imbalance of minerals in the water and soil.


2015 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 745-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Jégo ◽  
C. Alan Rotz ◽  
Gilles Bélanger ◽  
Gaëtan F. Tremblay ◽  
Édith Charbonneau ◽  
...  

Jégo, G., Rotz, C. A., Bélanger, G., Tremblay, G. F., Charbonneau, E. and Pellerin, D. 2015. Simulating forage crop production in a northern climate with the Integrated Farm System Model. Can. J. Plant Sci. 95: 745–757. Whole-farm simulation models are useful tools for evaluating the effect of management practices and climate variability on the agro-environmental and economic performance of farms. A few process-based farm-scale models have been developed, but none has been evaluated in northern regions with boreal and hemiboreal climates characterized by a short growing season and a long period with snow cover. The study objectives were to calibrate the grass sub-model of the Integrated Farm System Model (IFSM) and evaluate its predictions of yield and nutritive value of timothy and alfalfa, grown alone or in a mixture, using experimental field data from across Canada, andto assess IFSM's predictions of yield of major annual crops grown on dairy farms in eastern Canada using regional yield data from two contrasting regions. Several timothy and alfalfa datasets combining sites, years, harvests, and N fertilization rates were used to calibrate and evaluate the model. For timothy and alfalfa, the model's accuracy was globally satisfactory in predicting dry matter yield and neutral detergent fiber concentration with a normalized root mean square error (NRMSE)<30%. For N uptake, the scatter was a bit larger, especially for timothy (NRMSE= 49%), mainly because of a small range in the measured data. The model's accuracy for predicting the yield of annual crops was generally good, with an NRMSE<30%. Adding timothy and alfalfa to the grass sub-model of IFSM and verifying the model's performance for annual crops confirmed that IFSM can be used in northern regions of North America. In addition, the model was able to simulate the yield and nutritive value of a timothy–alfalfa mixture, which is the most common perennial mixture used in Canada.


1987 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1121-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. ANDREWS

Low temperature is a major constraint to the productivity of field crops. It is likely to remain so even in the event of increasing global temperature, because to maximize economic potential producers will tend to use the longest season crops compatible with average weather conditions. Low temperature in the growing season may reduce germination, may retard vegetative growth by inducing metabolic imbalances and can delay or prevent reproductive development. Chilling temperature can damage the tissues of sensitive plants while freezing temperature will damage most tissues during active growth. Low temperature during the winter season may cause the death of overwintering crop plants during their dormant phase. The overwintering habit in most crops results in higher yields due to the abundance of early spring moisture available to the crop. Death of plants may occur during winter by cell membrane disorganization during severe freezing exposure, by anaerobic stress due to flooding and ice encasement, by heaving of plants from soil by the formation of ice lenses, or by the activity of low temperature pathogens under snow cover. Environmental modifications to alleviate cold stress are only practical in a limited number of situations. Genotypic modifications are being made in many field crops to increase their tolerance to cold.Key words: Cold, freezing, chilling, winter survival


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document