scholarly journals Challenging encounters in clinical dentistry: a qualitative study investigating online reviews of patient satisfaction with Norwegian dentists

Author(s):  
Maria Larsen ◽  
Gro Eirin Holde ◽  
Jan-Are K. Johnsen
Author(s):  
Fernando García-Alfranca ◽  
Anna Puig ◽  
Carles Galup ◽  
Hortensia Aguado ◽  
Ismael Cerdá ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan L. Calcaterra ◽  
Anne D. Drabkin ◽  
Reina Doyle ◽  
Sarah E. Leslie ◽  
Ingrid A. Binswanger ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Trupti Dhumal ◽  
Vincent Giannetti ◽  
Khalid M. Kamal ◽  
Paul J. Freyder ◽  
Aishwarya Kulkarni ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. McLean ◽  
D. Hodgson

Recently, radiotherapy breast gowns have been introduced into some Radiotherapy Departments across the country. The idea of using the breast gowns came from issues highlighted regarding privacy and dignity from patient satisfaction surveys. The introduction of the breast gowns was not evidence based, however they have become popular as they were considered a good aid for patients' comfort. This study aimed to investigate patients' perceptions of the breast gowns using a qualitative, phenomenological approach. The methodology was designed to explore patient's feelings about their experiences throughout their cancer journey. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed and analysed, via content analysis. The key themes that emerged from the study were related to: patients' emotions; dignity and privacy issues; exposure; patient choice and an unexpected result were their views relating to the notion of “possession”. The results of this study cannot be generalised due to the methodology chosen, however the findings can aid the development of a multi-centred study to investigate this topic further. In addition, this study has highlighted an important recommendation for radiotherapy practice: the development of a “modesty gown” for most treatment sites.


Author(s):  
Ina Garnefeld ◽  
Tabea Krah ◽  
Eva Böhm ◽  
Dwayne D. Gremler

AbstractOnline reviews have profound impacts on firm success in terms of sales volume and how much customers are willing to pay, yet firms remain highly dependent on customers’ voluntary contributions. A popular way to increase the number of online reviews is to use product testing programs, which offer participants free products in exchange for writing reviews. Firms that employ this practice generally hope to increase review quality and secure higher product rating scores. However, a qualitative study, experimental study, and multilevel analysis of a field study dataset of more than 200,000 online reviews by product testers combine to reveal that product testing programs do not necessarily generate higher quality reviews, nor better product ratings. Only in certain circumstances (e.g., higher priced products) does offering a product testing program generate these benefits for the firm. Therefore, companies should consider carefully if and when they want to offer product testing programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document