Relationship between pure-tone audiogram findings and speech perception among older Japanese persons

2017 ◽  
Vol 138 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukihide Maeda ◽  
Soshi Takao ◽  
Akiko Sugaya ◽  
Yuko Kataoka ◽  
Shin Kariya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Speech Perception ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Pure Tone Audiogram

Measuring Temporal Resolution (Release of Masking) with a Hughson-Westlake Up-Down Instead of a Békèsy-Tracking Procedure

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (06) ◽  
pp. 563-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koenraad S. Rhebergen ◽  
Thamar E.M. van Esch ◽  
Wouter A. Dreschler
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Temporal Resolution ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Clinical Test ◽  
Rank Tests ◽  
Pure Tone Audiogram ◽  
Signed Rank ◽  
Golden Standard ◽  
Clinical Interest

Background: A temporal resolution test in addition to the pure-tone audiogram may be of great clinical interest because of its relevance in speech perception and expected relevance in hearing aid fitting. Larsby and Arlinger developed an appropriate clinical test, but this test uses a Békèsy-tracking procedure for estimating masked thresholds in stationary and interrupted noise to assess release of masking (RoM) for temporal resolution. Generally the Hughson-Westlake up-down procedure is used in the clinic to measure the pure-tone thresholds in quiet. A uniform approach will facilitate clinical application and might be appropriate for RoM measurements as well. Because there is no golden standard for measuring the RoM in the clinic, we examine in the present study the Hughson-Westlake up-down procedure to measure the RoM and compare the results with the Békèsy-tracking procedure. Purpose: The purpose of the current study was to examine the differences between a Békèsy-tracking procedure and the Hughson-Westlake up-down procedure for estimating masked thresholds in stationary and interrupted noise to assess RoM. Research Design: RoM is assessed in eight normal-hearing (NH) and ten hearing-impaired (HI) listeners through both methods. Results from both methods are compared with each other and with predicted thresholds from a model. Data Analysis: Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, paired t tests. Results: Some differences between the two methods were found. We used a model to quantify the results of the two measurement procedures. The results of the Hughson-Westlake procedure were clearly better in agreement with the model than the results of the Békèsy-tracking procedure. Furthermore, the Békèsy-tracking procedure showed more spread in the results of the NH listeners than the Hughson-Westlake procedure. Conclusions: The Hughson-Westlake procedure seems to be an applicable alternative for measuring RoM for temporal resolution in the clinical audiological practice.

Misophonia: An Evidence-Based Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-690
Author(s):  
C. S. Vanaja ◽  
Miriam Soni Abigail
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Case History ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Physiological Responses ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Management Option ◽  
Pure Tone Audiogram

Purpose Misophonia is a sound tolerance disorder condition in certain sounds that trigger intense emotional or physiological responses. While some persons may experience misophonia, a few patients suffer from misophonia. However, there is a dearth of literature on audiological assessment and management of persons with misophonia. The purpose of this report is to discuss the assessment of misophonia and highlight the management option that helped a patient with misophonia. Method A case study of a 26-year-old woman with the complaint of decreased tolerance to specific sounds affecting quality of life is reported. Audiological assessment differentiated misophonia from hyperacusis. Management included retraining counseling as well as desensitization and habituation therapy based on the principles described by P. J. Jastreboff and Jastreboff (2014). A misophonia questionnaire was administered at regular intervals to monitor the effectiveness of therapy. Results A detailed case history and audiological evaluations including pure-tone audiogram and Johnson Hyperacusis Index revealed the presence of misophonia. The patient benefitted from intervention, and the scores of the misophonia questionnaire indicated a decrease in the severity of the problem. Conclusions It is important to differentially diagnose misophonia and hyperacusis in persons with sound tolerance disorders. Retraining counseling as well as desensitization and habituation therapy can help patients who suffer from misophonia.

Oto Acoustic Emissions (OAE): the shape-similarity of pure-tone audiogram and OAE-gram

1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-383
Author(s):  
G. A. van zanten ◽  
A. van de sande ◽  
M. P. brocaar
Keyword(s):  
Pure Tone ◽  
Acoustic Emissions ◽  
Shape Similarity ◽  
Pure Tone Audiogram

Criteria for hearing preservation in acoustic schwannoma surgery: The concept of useful hearing

1992 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 500-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Hinton ◽  
R. T. Ramsden ◽  
R. H. Lye ◽  
J. E. M. Dutton
Keyword(s):  
Pure Tone ◽  
Tumour Size ◽  
Hearing Preservation ◽  
Discrimination Score ◽  
Speech Discrimination ◽  
Average Difference ◽  
Pure Tone Audiogram ◽  
Speech Discrimination Score ◽  
Acoustic Schwannoma

AbstractIn the quest for hearing preservation in patients with acoustic schwannomas it is essential that surgeons do not lose sight of the concept of ‘useful’ hearing. There is an important difference between hearing preservation which pleases the surgeon and that which will be appreciated by the patient.Tumour size, pure tone audiogram average differences between ears and speech discrimination scores have been recorded in a series of 114 patients with unilateral acoustic schwannomas. Criteria for useful hearing are presented in terms of pure tone audiogram average difference and speech discrimination scores.There were 11 patients (10 per cent) with a speech discrimination score of 50 per cent or more, a pure tone audiogram average difference of 30 dB or better and a tumour size of no more than 2 cm. Only one patient (0.9 per cent) had a speech discrimination score of 50 per cent or more, a pure tone audiogram average difference of 20 dB or better and a tumour size of no more than 1 cm.It is concluded that hearing preservation techniques may be applicable to between 1 and 10 per cent of patients with unilateral acoustic schwannomas.

What can the pure-tone audiogram tell us about a patientʼs SNR loss?

2000 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 46-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mead C. Killion ◽  
Patricia A. Niquette
Keyword(s):  
Pure Tone ◽  
Pure Tone Audiogram

A comparison of speech audiometry and pure tone audiometry in patients with secretory otitis media

1993 ◽  
Vol 107 (9) ◽  
pp. 787-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. Pringle ◽  
A. Thompson ◽  
K. Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Otitis Media ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Speech Audiometry ◽  
Secretory Otitis Media ◽  
Parental Concern ◽  
Pure Tone Audiogram ◽  
Hearing Ability

AbstractSpeech audiometry was performed on 15 children with secretory otitis media pre-and post-operatively and the findings compared with the pre-and post-operative pure tone audiograms. The results showed that in 30 per cent of cases pre-operatively the speech audiogram suggested a significantly worse hearing ability than that suggested by the pure tone audiogram (PTA). Where a PTA gives a borderline threshold disproportionate parental concern should be taken seriously as the hearing ability may well be worse than the PTA suggests.

Hearing Loss, Aging, and Speech Perception in Reverberation and Noise

1990 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen S. Helfer ◽  
Laura A. Wilber
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Nonsense Syllable ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Four Levels ◽  
Reverberant Speech ◽  
Pure Tone Threshold

The present investigation examined the effect of reverberation and noise on the perception of nonsense syllables by four groups of subjects: younger (≤35 years of age) and older (>60 years of age) listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss; younger, normal-hearing individuals; and older adults with minimal peripheral hearing loss. Copies of the Nonsense Syllable Test (Resnick, Dubno, Huffnung, & Levitt, 1975) were re-recorded under four levels of reverberation (0.0, 0.6, 0.9, 1.3 s) in quiet and in cafeteria noise at + 10 dB S:N. Results suggest that both age and amount of pure-tone hearing loss contribute to senescent changes in the ability to understand noisy, reverberant speech: pure-tone threshold and age were correlated negatively with performance in reverberation plus noise, although age and pure-tone hearing loss were not correlated with each other. Further, many older adults with minimal amounts of peripheral hearing loss demonstrated difficulty understanding distorted consonants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document