Further Considerations of Time Distortion: Subjective Time Condensation as Distinct from Time Expansion

1958 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milton H. Erickson ◽  
Elizabeth M. Erickson
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor B. Penney ◽  
Xiaoqin Cheng ◽  
Yan Ling Leow ◽  
Audrey Wei Ying Bay ◽  
Esther Wu ◽  
...  

A transient suppression of visual perception during saccades ensures perceptual stability. In two experiments, we examined whether saccades affect time perception of visual and auditory stimuli in the seconds range. Specifically, participants completed a duration reproduction task in which they memorized the duration of a 6 s timing signal during the training phase and later reproduced that duration during the test phase. Four experimental conditions differed in saccade requirements and the presence or absence of a secondary discrimination task during the test phase. For both visual and auditory timing signals, participants reproduced longer durations when the secondary discrimination task required saccades to be made (i.e., overt attention shift) during reproduction as compared to when the discrimination task merely required fixation at screen center. Moreover, greater total saccade duration in a trial resulted in greater time distortion. However, in the visual modality, requiring participants to covertly shift attention (i.e., no saccade) to complete the discrimination task increased reproduced duration as much as making a saccade, whereas in the auditory modality making a saccade increased reproduced duration more than making a covert attention shift. In addition, we examined microsaccades in the conditions that did not require full saccades for both the visual and auditory experiments. Greater total microsaccade duration in a trial resulted in greater time distortion in both modalities. Taken together, the experiments suggest that saccades and microsaccades affect seconds range visual and auditory interval timing via attention and saccadic suppression mechanisms.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 384-384
Author(s):  
K.-M. Chen ◽  
H.-H. You ◽  
S.-L. Yeh

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 1150-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Sengupta ◽  
S. Bapiraju ◽  
P. Basu ◽  
D. Melcher

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Ling Yang ◽  
Sei-ichi Tsujimura ◽  
Akiko Matsumoto ◽  
Wakayo Yamashita ◽  
Su-Ling Yeh

2001 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerrit Antonides ◽  
Sophia R. Wunderink

Summary: Different shapes of individual subjective discount functions were compared using real measures of willingness to accept future monetary outcomes in an experiment. The two-parameter hyperbolic discount function described the data better than three alternative one-parameter discount functions. However, the hyperbolic discount functions did not explain the common difference effect better than the classical discount function. Discount functions were also estimated from survey data of Dutch households who reported their willingness to postpone positive and negative amounts. Future positive amounts were discounted more than future negative amounts and smaller amounts were discounted more than larger amounts. Furthermore, younger people discounted more than older people. Finally, discount functions were used in explaining consumers' willingness to pay for an energy-saving durable good. In this case, the two-parameter discount model could not be estimated and the one-parameter models did not differ significantly in explaining the data.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Buetti ◽  
Stefania Mereu ◽  
Alejandro Lleras
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document