The Impact of Prefrontal Cortex for Selective Attention in a Visual Working Memory Task

2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (12) ◽  
pp. 1673-1688 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Schreppel ◽  
P. Pauli ◽  
H. Ellgring ◽  
A. J. Fallgatter ◽  
M. J. Herrmann
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Selective Attention ◽  
Visual Working Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
The Impact

Interactions Between Visual Working Memory and Selective Attention

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 467-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul E. Downing
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Selective Attention ◽  
Visual Working Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Relevant Information ◽  
Opposite Pattern ◽  
Sample Object ◽  
Probe Task ◽  
Specific Prediction ◽  
Memory Contents

The relationship between working memory and selective attention has traditionally been discussed as operating in one direction: Attention filters incoming information, allowing only relevant information into short-term processing stores. This study tested the prediction that the contents of visual working memory also influence the guidance of selective attention. Participants held a sample object in working memory on each trial. Two objects, one matching the sample and the other novel, were then presented simultaneously. As measured by a probe task, attention shifted to the object matching the sample. This effect generalized across object type, attentional-probe task, and working memory task. In contrast, a matched task with no memory requirement showed the opposite pattern, demonstrating that this effect is not simply due to exposure to the sample. These results confirm a specific prediction about the influence of working memory contents on the guidance of attention.

scholarly journals Reduced anterior prefrontal cortex activation in young binge drinkers during a visual working memory task

2010 ◽  
Vol 109 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 45-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Crego ◽  
Socorro Rodriguez-Holguín ◽  
María Parada ◽  
Nayara Mota ◽  
Montserrat Corral ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Visual Working Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Binge Drinkers ◽  
Anterior Prefrontal Cortex

scholarly journals Retrospective and prospective prioritization in visual working memory

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard John Allen ◽  
Amy Louise Atkinson
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Selective Attention ◽  
Visual Working Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Strategic Process ◽  
Growing Body ◽  
Memory Representations ◽  
Sequence Position ◽  
Item Availability

A growing body of research indicates that items assigned with a higher ‘value’ prior to presentationare better recalled in working memory tasks. This has been interpreted as reflecting the strategic prioritization of these items via selective attention during encoding, maintenance, and retrieval. The current study sought to establish whether value-based prioritization effects can be obtained in a sequential visual working memory task when value information is provided retrospectively during maintenance and items are no longer present in the environment. Enhanced recall of high value items along with costs to low value items (relative to equal value trials) was observed, although the high value benefit was only reliably found on the final sequence position. In comparison, a follow- up experiment in which values were provided prior to presentation found large prioritization benefits across sequence positions. This study illustrates that attention can be retrospective shifted between working memory representations based on value, but the effectiveness of this strategic process depends on item availability and accessibility, either in the environment or in working memory.

Do Children With Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) Have Difficulties With Interference Control, Visuospatial Working Memory, and Selective Attention? Developmental Patterns and the Role of Severity and Persistence of DLD

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 3036-3050
Author(s):  
Elma Blom ◽  
Tessel Boerma
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Selective Attention ◽  
Language Disorder ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Developmental Language Disorder ◽  
Visuospatial Working Memory ◽  
Interference Control ◽  
Developmental Patterns ◽  
Search Tasks ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Many children with developmental language disorder (DLD) have weaknesses in executive functioning (EF), specifically in tasks testing interference control and working memory. It is unknown how EF develops in children with DLD, if EF abilities are related to DLD severity and persistence, and if EF weaknesses expand to selective attention. This study aimed to address these gaps. Method Data from 78 children with DLD and 39 typically developing (TD) children were collected at three times with 1-year intervals. At Time 1, the children were 5 or 6 years old. Flanker, Dot Matrix, and Sky Search tasks tested interference control, visuospatial working memory, and selective attention, respectively. DLD severity was based on children's language ability. DLD persistence was based on stability of the DLD diagnosis. Results Performance on all tasks improved in both groups. TD children outperformed children with DLD on interference control. No differences were found for visuospatial working memory and selective attention. An interference control gap between the DLD and TD groups emerged between Time 1 and Time 2. Severity and persistence of DLD were related to interference control and working memory; the impact on working memory was stronger. Selective attention was unrelated to DLD severity and persistence. Conclusions Age and DLD severity and persistence determine whether or not children with DLD show EF weaknesses. Interference control is most clearly impaired in children with DLD who are 6 years and older. Visuospatial working memory is impaired in children with severe and persistent DLD. Selective attention is spared.

scholarly journals Are visual working memory and episodic memory distinct processes? Insight from stroke patients by lesion-symptom mapping

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selma Lugtmeijer ◽  
◽  
Linda Geerligs ◽  
Frank Erik de Leeuw ◽  
Edward H. F. de Haan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Episodic Memory ◽  
Visual Working Memory ◽  
Visual Memory ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Lesion Symptom Mapping ◽  
Criterion Setting ◽  
The Right

AbstractWorking memory and episodic memory are two different processes, although the nature of their interrelationship is debated. As these processes are predominantly studied in isolation, it is unclear whether they crucially rely on different neural substrates. To obtain more insight in this, 81 adults with sub-acute ischemic stroke and 29 elderly controls were assessed on a visual working memory task, followed by a surprise subsequent memory test for the same stimuli. Multivariate, atlas- and track-based lesion-symptom mapping (LSM) analyses were performed to identify anatomical correlates of visual memory. Behavioral results gave moderate evidence for independence between discriminability in working memory and subsequent memory, and strong evidence for a correlation in response bias on the two tasks in stroke patients. LSM analyses suggested there might be independent regions associated with working memory and episodic memory. Lesions in the right arcuate fasciculus were more strongly associated with discriminability in working memory than in subsequent memory, while lesions in the frontal operculum in the right hemisphere were more strongly associated with criterion setting in subsequent memory. These findings support the view that some processes involved in working memory and episodic memory rely on separate mechanisms, while acknowledging that there might also be shared processes.

scholarly journals The Impact of Object Complexity on Visual Working Memory Capacity

Psychology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (06) ◽  
pp. 929-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxi Chen ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Yaozhong Liu
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Visual Working Memory ◽  
Working Memory Capacity ◽  
Memory Capacity ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Prefrontal and Parietal Attractor Networks Mediate Working Memory Judgments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sihai Li ◽  
Christos Constantinidis ◽  
Xue-Lian Qi
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Delayed Response ◽  
Persistent Activity ◽  
Neural Basis ◽  
Brain Areas ◽  
Dorsolateral Prefrontal

ABSTRACTThe dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays a critical role in spatial working memory and its activity predicts behavioral responses in delayed response tasks. Here we addressed whether this predictive ability extends to categorical judgments based on information retained in working memory, and is present in other brain areas. We trained monkeys in a novel, Match-Stay, Nonmatch-Go task, which required them to observe two stimuli presented in sequence with an intervening delay period between them. If the two stimuli were different, the monkeys had to saccade to the location of the second stimulus; if they were the same, they held fixation. Neurophysiological recordings were performed in areas 8a and 46 of the dlPFC and 7a and lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) of the PPC. We hypothesized that random drifts causing the peak activity of the network to move away from the first stimulus location and towards the location of the second stimulus would result in categorical errors. Indeed, for both areas, when the first stimulus appeared in a neuron’s preferred location, the neuron showed significantly higher firing rates in correct than in error trials. When the first stimulus appeared at a nonpreferred location and the second stimulus at a preferred, activity in error trials was higher than in correct. The results indicate that the activity of both dlPFC and PPC neurons is predictive of categorical judgments of information maintained in working memory, and the magnitude of neuronal firing rate deviations is revealing of the contents of working memory as it determines performance.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe neural basis of working memory and the areas mediating this function is a topic of controversy. Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex has traditionally been thought to be the neural correlate of working memory, however recent studies have proposed alternative mechanisms and brain areas. Here we show that persistent activity in both the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex predicts behavior in a working memory task that requires a categorical judgement. Our results offer support to the idea that a network of neurons in both areas act as an attractor network that maintains information in working memory, which informs behavior.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document