A Perceptual-Motivational Theory of the Occurrence and Intensity of Emotion

1950 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-124
Author(s):  
Henry D. Meyer
2001 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Collins

The reception of Jacques Derrida in the academic community has frequently been a source of controversy. Whilst America has often been hospitable to his thought, the situation in British and even French universities has occasionally been openly hostile. Derrida arouses an intensity of emotion illustrated by the two hundred and four academics at Cambridge University who attempted to block the award of an honorary degree in 1992. Like the reaction within other disciplines, the theological response was, and remains, fissured. Leading the critics, Brian Hebblethwaite lent vocal support to Derrida's detractors. Nevertheless, Hebblethwaite's published criticisms of Derrida at the time lack either theological or philosophical arguments. Instead, his assessment reveals a knowledge of Derrida gleaned almost exclusively from secondary sources, with the exception of a lone reference to Derrida's debate with John Searle in Limited Inc.


Author(s):  
Marcos Nadal ◽  
Esther Ureña

This article reviews the history of empirical aesthetics since its foundation by Fechner in 1876 to Berlyne’s new empirical aesthetics in the 1970s. The authors explain why and how Fechner founded the field, and how Wundt and Müller’s students continued his work in the early 20th century. In the United States, empirical aesthetics flourished as part of American functional psychology at first, and later as part of behaviorists’ interest in reward value. The heyday of behaviorism was also a golden age for the development of all sorts of tests for artistic and aesthetic aptitudes. The authors end the article by covering the contributions of Gestalt psychology and Berlyne’s motivational theory to empirical aesthetics.


1987 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 519-529
Author(s):  
Sydney Reisbick ◽  
Ton-Sook Choi

The evaluation that an event is significant to life or goals may be important as a source of intensity of emotion as well as of kind of emotion. One factor in significance may be the perceived personal distance of the person evaluating the event from the person involved in the event. A simple survey questionnaire included events intended to elicit five different emotions. The 62 American and 71 Korean subjects rated on a scale of 1 to 7 the intensity of emotion they would feel for each of four different levels of personal distance: self, sibling, friend, stranger. Significant differences were found for both personal distance and kind of emotion but not for culture. Interactions were found and the results discussed.


2011 ◽  
pp. 92-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine Stockdale ◽  
Marlene Sinclair ◽  
George Kernohan ◽  
John Keller
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Heather Thompson-Brenner ◽  
Melanie Smith ◽  
Gayle Brooks ◽  
Rebecca Berman ◽  
Angela Kaloudis ◽  
...  

The session in this chapter looks at how suppression of thoughts and emotions can be counterproductive. Suppression or attempted avoidance may control things somewhat in the short term but rarely works in the long term, and it increases intensity of emotion when a similar situation is encountered in the future. Subtle behavioral avoidance, cognitive avoidance, and safety signals are introduced, and clients are asked to provide their own examples. Habitual avoidance of emotion creates negative messages about our capabilities and robs us of the chance to learn that the emotion is tolerable and will pass on its own without our efforts to avoid or escape. In this countering avoidant behavior session, clients are taught how to do the opposite of avoidance by developing a willingness to lean into emotions, or approach them, and thereby learn new lessons about emotion, situations, and themselves.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document