Effects of Response Type and Problem Complexity upon Classification Learning

1965 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary A. Davis ◽  
Lyle E. Bourne
2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian H. Ross ◽  
Ranxiao F. Wang ◽  
Arthur F. Kramer ◽  
Daniel J. Simons ◽  
James A. Crowell

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niranjan Raghunathan ◽  
Mikhail Bragin ◽  
Bing Yan ◽  
Peter Luh ◽  
Khosrow Moslehi ◽  
...  

Unit commitment (UC) is an important problem solved on a daily basis within a strict time limit. While hourly UC problems are currently considered, they may not be flexible enough with the fast-changing demand and the increased penetration of intermittent renewables. Sub-hourly UC is therefore recommended. This, however, will significantly increase problem complexity even under the deterministic setting, and current methods may not be able to obtain good solutions within the time limit. In this paper, deterministic sub-hourly UC is considered, with the innovative exploitation of soft constraints – constraints that do not need to be strictly satisfied, but with predetermined penalty coefficients for their violations. The key idea is the “surrogate optimization” concept that ensures multiplier convergence within “surrogate” Lagrangian relaxation as long as the “surrogate optimality condition” is satisfied without the need to optimally solve the “relaxed problem.” Consequently, subproblems can still be formed and optimized when soft constraints are not relaxed, leading to a drastically reduced number of multipliers and improved performance. To further enhance the method, a parallel version is developed. Testing results on the Polish system demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of both the sequential and parallel versions at finding high-quality solutions within the time limit.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 808-825
Author(s):  
Gabriela Gniewosz ◽  
Tuulia M. Ortner ◽  
Thomas Scherndl

Performance on achievement tests is characterized by an interplay of different individual attributes such as personality traits, motivation or cognitive styles. However, the prediction of individuals’ performance from classical self–report personality measures obtained during large and comprehensive aptitude assessments is biased by, for example, subjective response tendencies. This study goes beyond by using behavioural data based on two different types of tasks, requiring different conscientious–related response behaviours. Moreover, a typological approach is proposed, which includes different behavioural indicators to obtain information on complex personality characteristics. © 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Personality published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Personality Psychology


2018 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 371-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Béatrice Garcin ◽  
Emmanuelle Volle ◽  
Aurélie Funkiewiez ◽  
Bruce L. Miller ◽  
Bruno Dubois ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
P. Molavi ◽  
M. Karimollahi ◽  
M. Faridi

Background:Depression as a common psychiatric disorder can occur in two types: Endogenous or genetic and exogenous or Reactional. These two types of depression, from the point of view of response speed to treatment and type of appropriate drug for treatment are different. This study has been executed to compare therapeutic effects of different classes of anti-depressant drugs in treatment of genetic and Reactional depression.Materials and methods:Present survey is a clinical-trial study, a completely randomly block type, that has performed on 30 patients (male and female). Selection of study sample accomplished randomly among unipolar depressed patients that has referred to Ardabil’s psychiatry clinic diagnosed based on DSM-IV criteria. Researcher - Made questionnaire, Beck, and Catelle depression test were used to collect data. To analyze data, for completely randomly blocked designs, two-factor variance analysis method and F test were used.Results:This study showed that Genetical depression does not response treatment Rapidly and its response type is not good and persistent. From the point of view of time, Reactional depression has a delaying response but its response type is good and persistent. In addition, no difference was observed in efficacy of different classes of drugs for treatment of these two types of depression. The results of this research showed that there is no difference between treatment response of two types of depression (Genetical and Reactional).Conclusions:There is no preference in efficacy of different classes of drugs in treatment of these two types of depression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document