The Effects of Sex and Gender-Role Characteristics on Facets of Sociosexuality in Heterosexual Young Adults

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Rammsayer ◽  
Natalie Borter ◽  
Stefan J. Troche
Author(s):  
Yen-Mou Lu ◽  
Chung-Hwan Chen ◽  
Yi-Jing Lue

BACKGROUND: Sex and gender affect responses to pain, but little is known about disability and quality of life. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of sex and gender on disability and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with low back pain. METHODS: Ninety-three patients with low back pain were included in this cross-sectional survey study. Disability, HRQOL and gender identity were respectively assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form-36 and Bem Sex Role Inventory. The participants were classified into four gender role orientations (masculinity, femininity, androgyny and undifferentiated). One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze both the sex and the gender role orientation. RESULTS: Females had higher disability than males (p< 0.05), but in gender identity, no significant difference was found. Seven domains of HRQOL were lower than the healthy norms. Males experienced greater impacts than females on vitality and mental health (p< 0.05). For gender identity, five domains of HRQOL had significant differences (p< 0.05). Masculinity orientation had the least impact on four domains (p< 0.05), while undifferentiated orientation had the largest impact on all domains. CONCLUSION: Sex and gender effects can be used to analyze disability and HRQOL in patients with low back pain. Females have higher disability, while HRQOL is greatly influenced by different gender role orientations.


1991 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Sidanius ◽  
B. J. Cling ◽  
Felicia Pratto

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 1335-1346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell L. Kent ◽  
Sherry E. Moss

2001 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darryl Milovchevich ◽  
Kevin Howells ◽  
Neil Drew ◽  
Andrew Day

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 422-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis E. Reidy ◽  
Katie Dimmick ◽  
Kate MacDonald ◽  
Amos Zeichner

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Wharton ◽  
Andrew Day ◽  
Philip Mohr ◽  
Adam Gerace ◽  
Kevin Howells

This study aimed to investigate the influence of sex and gender role identity on anger experience at varying levels of provocation in a sample of 585 Australian students. Participants viewed videotaped vignettes of a potentially anger-triggering event where the intent of another person was either ambiguous or unambiguous. Measures of self-predicted anger, trait anger, and gender role identity were then completed. Results supported the hypothesis that it is gender role identity rather than sex that is more closely related to angry emotion. There was, however, no support for the hypothesis that anger arousal would be greater in circumstances in which the intention behind a provoking event is ambiguous when the respondent identifies with a masculine gender role. The implications of these findings for the development of anger management programs are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document