scholarly journals Choosing the reference system for liquid state perturbation theory

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 871-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Lado
1974 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 462-468
Author(s):  
N. C. Haider

The temperature dependence of optical absorptions in liquid Na is calculated. The electron energy values are obtained to second order in perturbation theory which are then used to determine the electron density of states. The density of states plots show some structure similar to those noted in the solid state. The optical conductivity in the liquid state is found to increase with the temperature as in the solid state. The present calculation for the optical conductivity gives a rather sharp peak around ħ ω = 1.7 eV. These results are in better agreement with the existing experimental results


1989 ◽  
Vol 93 (11) ◽  
pp. 4636-4642 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lombardero ◽  
C. Martin ◽  
E. Lomba ◽  
J. L. F. Abascal

Author(s):  
C. G. Gray ◽  
K. E. Gubbins

In perturbation theory one relates the properties (e.g. the distribution functions or free energy) of the real system, for which the intermolecular potential energy is u(rN ωN), to those of a reference system where the potential is u0(rNωN), usually by an expansion in powers of the perturbation potential u1 ≡ u — u0. The first-order, second-order, etc. perturbation terms then involve both u1 and the distribution functions for the reference system. In the sections that follow we first briefly discuss the historical background of perturbation theory (§ 4.1). As a simple example we then derive the u-expansion for the free energy (§ 4.2). This is followed by general expansions for the angular pair correlation function (§ 4.3) and the free energy (§ 4.4). The expansions developed in these latter sections are for an arbitrary reference system and arbitrary perturbation parameter. We next consider some particular choices of reference system and perturbation parameter. We first consider the u-expansion (§ 4.5) further, for a potential having both attractive and repulsive parts, and also the f-expansion (§ 4.6) which uses a different reference fluid. This is followed by a description of methods for expanding the system properties for an anisotropic repulsive potential about those for a hard sphere potential (§4.7), and then the expansion for a general potential (attractive and repulsive parts) about a non-spherical reference potential (§ 4.8). We also discuss two approximation methods based on perturbation theory, the effective central potential method (§ 4.9), and generalized van der Waals models (§4.11). Non-additive potential effects are discussed in §4.10. Perturbation theories have been the subject of reviews for both atomic and molecular liquids. Perturbation expansions are closely related to inverse temperature expansions, which have been a standard technique since the earliest days of statistical mechanics. As examples, we mention some early work on gases (virial coefficients, dielectric and Kerr constants), and solids (lattice phonon specific heat, polar lattice thermodynamics, electric and magnetic susceptibility properties, alloy order-disorder transitions, ferromagnetism, and diamagnetism). In considering perturbation theory for liquids it is convenient first to discuss the historical development for atomic liquids.


1995 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 228-231
Author(s):  
N. Capitaine

The reference frames are of fundamental importance in all kinds of the precession and nutation studies involving the theory, the coordinate transformation and the observations. The aim of this paper is to review all the frames used in such studies and to lead to a better consistency between them in order that theory and reductions of observations be referred, as close as possible, to the frames to which observables are actually sensitive.The equations of Earth rotation can be expressed either as Euler equations in the Terrestrial Reference System (TRS), or as perturbation theory in the Celestial Reference System (CRS) (Kinoshita 1977). Euler equations are transformed to the CRS in the astronomical approach (Woolard 1953) and solved by the method of variation of the parameters, whereas, in the geophysical approach (Melchior 1971), the solutions, first obtained in the TRS, are transformed to the CRS and then solved by an integration with respect to time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document