Sample Size Required to Estimate the Ratio of Variances with Bounded Relative Error

1963 ◽  
Vol 58 (304) ◽  
pp. 1044-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklin A. Graybill ◽  
Terrence L. Connell
2005 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 1503-1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Foster D McClure ◽  
Jung K Lee

Abstract Sample size formulas are developed to estimate the repeatability and reproducibility standard deviations (sr and sR) such that the actual error in (sr and sR) relative to their respective true values, σr and σR, are at predefined levels. The statistical consequences associated with AOAC INTERNATIONAL required sample size to validate an analytical method are discussed. In addition, formulas to estimate the uncertainties of (sr and sR) were derived and are provided as supporting documentation.Formula for the Number of Replicates Required for a Specified Margin of Relative Error in the Estimate of the Repeatability Standard Deviation


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton Iehorovych Bereznytskyi

In order to determine the technical condition of energetic objects with the objective of ensuring their operational reliability, durability and safety, systems of noise diagnostics, which are based on the analysis of acoustic diagnostic signals. A promising area of noise diagnostics are cumulant methods, based on cumulant analysis, which involves the use of cumulants and cumulant coefficients. In known literature no characteristics of detection of a signal within an interference-containing additive mixture with the use of a second-order cumulant (variance) can be found. That is why the objective of the paper is to study the use of cumulant method on the basis of point estimations of variance for a sample of momentary values for detection of an acoustic signal against the background of noise interference. The research was carried out by way of modeling the additive mixture of signal and interference using the MATLAB® software package. Interference is a model of a noise acoustic signal, which accompanies the operation of properly functional equipment. Signal is a model of an acoustic signal which is created with the occurrence of a malfunction. Signal and interference are independent random variables, so the property of additivity of cumulants was used – the variance of a mixture equals the sum of variances of signal and interference. The decision about the presence of a signal was made on the basis of testing two statistical hypotheses. The null hypothesis – the signal is absent, variance equals to the variance of the interference. The first hypothesis – the signal is present, variance equals to the variance of the mixture. Additional parameters: probability of a Type I error 0,01, probability of correct determination 0,99. The relative error of estimation determined the minimal sample size. These values allowed for the calculation of the threshold value, upon the exceeding of which by the variance estimation, the decision on the presence of signal is made. For each sample, assessments of variance were made. Experimental probability of correct determination is calculated as a total number of decisions taken regarding the presence of a signal, divided by the number of realizations, and corresponds to the value of the specified probability of correct determination. Its relative error was calculated in order to control the validity of the results. Also, kernel density estimation of the probability of the variance assessment for the case of a signal with normal distribution. As shown by the graphs, the assessments have a distribution that is close to normal. The conducted study proves that a variance -based cumulant method allows to detect a signal against the background of noise interference. The necessary sample size, which shows the number of the necessary momentary values, is given in the paper. That is to say that with the help of the frequency of an analogue digital converter the needed duration of the recording of a real for assessment of its variance can be obtained, and the decision on the presence or absence of a signal is to be made on the basis of the specified threshold values. The results of the study can be added to the known sample sizes and threshold values for the coefficients of asymmetry and excess with different distributions. Application of the described method requires additional testing on real acoustic signals and has the areas of use in systems of noise diagnostics.


Author(s):  
Pavel Ukrainskiy

A promising fast method for estimating land cover areas from satellite imagery is the use of random point sampling. This method allows you to obtain area values without spatially continuous mapping of land areas. The accuracy of the area estimate by this method depends on the sample size. The presented work describes a method for empirically finding the optimal sample size. To use this method, you must select a key site for which a reference land cover exists. For the key site, we perform multiple generation of samples of different sizes. Further, using these samples, we estimate the area of land cover. Comparison of the obtained areas with the reference areas allows you to calculate the measurement error. Analysis of the mean and the range of errors for different sample sizes allows us to identify the moment when the error ceases to decrease significantly with an increase in the sample size. This sample size is optimal. We tested the proposed method on the example of the Kalach Upland. The size range from 100 to 3000 sampling points per key site is analyzed (the size of the sampling in the row increases by 100 points). For each element of this row, we created 1000 samples of the corresponding size. We then analyzed the effect of sample size on the overall relative error in area estimates. The analysis showed that for the investigated key site the optimal sample size is 1000 points (1.1 points/km2). With this sample size, the overall relative error in determining areas was 4.0 % on average, and the maximum error was 9.9 %. Similar accuracy should be at the same sample size for other uplands in the foreststeppe and steppe zones of the East European plain.


2005 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 268-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard B. Anderson ◽  
Michael E. Doherty ◽  
Neil D. Berg ◽  
Jeff C. Friedrich
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lopez-Ramon ◽  
C. Castro ◽  
J. Roca ◽  
J. Lupianez

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis L. Jackson ◽  
Marc Frey ◽  
Jennifer Voth
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document