Integrated river basin planning and management: a case study of the Zayandehrud River basin, Iran

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 724-743 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morteza Safaei ◽  
Hamid R. Safavi ◽  
Daniel Peter Loucks ◽  
Azadeh Ahmadi ◽  
Wil van der Krogt
2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 2773-2791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. C. Ethan Yang ◽  
Patrick A. Ray ◽  
Casey M. Brown ◽  
Abedalrazq F. Khalil ◽  
Winston H. Yu

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish Pandey ◽  
Bishal Kc ◽  
Praveen Kalura ◽  
Vemuri Mutthya Chowdary

<p>Suitable and practicable best management practices (BMPs) are needed to develop effective and efficient watershed management under future climate change scenarios. Tons river basin is an agricultural-based watershed having a great significance to the States of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. Identification of critical erosion prone areas of the Tons River basin and implementation of BMPs for the future scenarios (2030-2050) using RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios is the main aim of this study. In this study, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was calibrated and validated for simulation of runoff and sediment yield using the Sequential Uncertainty Fitting (SUFI-2) technique. The values of coefficient of determination (R2), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), percent bias (PBIAS) and RMSE-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR) were 0.71, 0.70, -8.3 and 0.54 respectively during the calibration period whereas in validation the values were 0.72, 0.71, -3.9 and 0.56 respectively. Thus, the SWAT model can be employed in the Tons river basin of India for critical area prioritization and river basin planning and management under future scenarios.</p>


Water Policy ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 493-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsty L. Blackstock ◽  
Caspian Richards

River basin management demonstrates the increasing importance of active stakeholder involvement within environmental governance, whereby planning and implementation relies on outcomes from collective reasoned discussion. However, claims that stakeholder involvement improves environmental governance are rarely subject to critical examination. This lack of evaluation is problematic for several reasons including: lack of reflection on the purpose of involvement processes or their limitations; a poor conceptualisation of who should be defined as a stakeholder; how different knowledge claims should be treated; and how power relationships affect the process dynamics. This paper engages with the theoretical claims for active involvement and uses a Scottish case study to illustrate to what extent these claims were met during a river basin planning process. The evaluation highlights lessons for policy makers designing river basin management plans, particularly in the context of the pressing timetable for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive. These lessons include how to maximise these benefits whilst proactively managing conflicts that occur, particularly when trying to sustain a coalition of individuals representing broader organisations and constituencies in a time-consuming and challenging process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document