The function of the art object: art-psychotherapy theory and practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-51
Author(s):  
Liam Bierschenk
2019 ◽  
pp. 40-47
Author(s):  
Н. Л. Базелюк

Purpose. Disclosure of decorative and functional features of forms of art object and analysis of their creative and aesthetic content. Methodology. In the course of the research, the purpose of field surveys and generally scientific methods of analysis, synthesis and analogies were used. Results. As a result of a theoretical study, the primary stages of art-form object formation are determined; its characteristic features and peculiarities of ideological and ideological ideas and creative language are revealed. The close relationship between form and content, which forms an imaginative, symbolic, spiritual and aesthetic art object with the emotional power of influence and impression, is considered. Scientific novelty. The article analyses and explores the peculiarities of creating an art object form to convey an artistic image and an author's idea. The features and stages of forming an art object form as a complex, multifaceted phenomenon are presented, which allows becoming more aware of its functional, material and artistic features. Practical significance. Research findings can be used as promising areas for research in design theory and practice. The main defining features and features of building an art object can be applied directly in the creative work of designers.


Author(s):  
Nozomu Ozaki

In reviewing Qualitative Research in Counseling and Psychotherapy (McLeod, 2011), I encountered with this text a backdrop of a grand tour question, "How well has the author contextualized qualitative inquiry in the realm of counseling and psychotherapy theory and practice?" I found McLeod (2011) constantly embedding qualitative methodology and plethora of methods into counseling and psychotherapy field by pointing out the relationship between research and practice of counseling and psychotherapy and giving detailed account on philosophical foundations and actual practice of qualitative methods while zigzagging among multiple levels of contexts. At the same time, McLeod maintained his pluralistic position on methodologies and methods by critically examining multiple forms of knowing and positioning toward production of knowledge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document