Driving after brain injury: Self-awareness and coping at the tactical level of control

Brain Injury ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1109-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Lundqvist ◽  
Johan Alinder
2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 899-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Medley ◽  
Theresa Powell ◽  
Andrew Worthington ◽  
Gagandeep Chohan ◽  
Chris Jones

Brain Injury ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 823-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Lundqvist ◽  
Hannah Linnros ◽  
Helene Orlenius ◽  
Kersti Samuelsson

Author(s):  
Geeta Shinde

Now a day’sparents, teachers,students,institutes,policy makers,and politicians also talking about life skills. They consider that “We should not give the only a text book knowledge to our child, we should provide them all skills which required for excellent life .If you want to say say I am human or we are social animals then you must acquire the skills which defined by the WHO.These are known as communication,critical thinking, creativity, self-awareness, decision making, problem solving,empathy, interpersonal relationship ,these all require for coping with stress and coping with emotions.This paper is focus based on literature reviews,how this skills are nurtured not only our education system overall human life. Along with trying to focus life skill policy and practices.


2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 651-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicity G. Hurst ◽  
Tamara Ownsworth ◽  
Elizabeth Beadle ◽  
David H. K. Shum ◽  
Jennifer Fleming

Author(s):  
Lianne D. Peppel ◽  
Majanka H. Heijenbrok-Kal ◽  
Thomas A. Van Essen ◽  
Godard C. W. De Ruiter ◽  
Wilco C. Peul ◽  
...  

Objective: To select a set of rehabilitation outcome instruments for a national Neurotrauma Quality Registry (Net-QuRe) among professionals involved in the care of patients with traumatic brain injury. Design: A 3-round online Delphi procedure. Subjects: Eighty professionals from multiple disciplines working in 1 of the 8 participating rehabilitation centres were invited to participate. The response rate varied from 70% to 76% per round. Methods: For the Delphi procedure, multiple outcome categories were defined based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) with concomitant measurement instruments. For each category we strived for consensus on one instrument of at least 75%. Results: After the first round, consensus was reached for the category subjective cognitive functioning. After the second round for quality of life, pain, general functioning, anxiety and depression, general psychological functioning, communication (impairment), and personal factors. Finally, after the third round, consensus was reached for activities of daily living, participation, self-awareness, and aphasia. No consensus was reached for the categories motor function, cognitive function, comorbidity, fatigue, and employment status. Conclusion: Consensus was reached in 12 out of 17 outcome categories. A Delphi procedure seems to be a feasible method to collectively select measurement instruments for a multicentre study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document