Physical Activity Interventions in Rehabilitation Programs for Outpatients With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Author(s):  
Christophe Alarie ◽  
Isabelle Gagnon ◽  
Sara Gagnon ◽  
David Gendron ◽  
Catherine Girard ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Alarie ◽  
Isabelle Gagnon ◽  
Lily Trang Than Huynh ◽  
Karine Doucet ◽  
Adèle Pichette-Auray ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Physical activity interventions have been shown to be an effective therapeutic approach to improve symptoms and reduce recovery time after a mild traumatic brain injury. Service providers from a specialized traumatic brain injury outpatient rehabilitation program recognized the need to ensure their physical activity intervention integrated evidence-based treatment components, while considering user needs and preferences. To inform quality improvement efforts, service providers felt it necessary to learn about the perceptions of key stakeholders, regarding the quality of the intervention. The study objective was to explore the perceptions of administrators, clinicians and users of the specialized program regarding the physical activity intervention’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT). Methods Using a SWOT analysis framework, this qualitative study explored the perspectives of the purposive sample (n=14) composed of the managerial staff, six clinicians and five program users. Semi-structured interviews were performed, recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a qualitative content analysis approach. Results Fifty categories were generated resulting in 15 strengths, 17 weaknesses, 12 opportunities and 6 threats grouped into 8 overarching categories: physical activity intervention, health-related outcomes, clinical expertise, knowledge translation, communication, user engagement, resources, accessibility. Category descriptions, convergent and divergent perspectives, and salient quotes of participants are provided. Conclusions This study successfully identified perceived strengths, many weaknesses, several opportunities and a few threats. Participants were generally positive about the intervention but identified weaknesses including the need for service providers to better describe the physical activity intervention using theoretically driven approaches before engaging in quality improvement activities. Convergent and divergent perspectives of service providers and program users helped identify areas to maintain and others to improve upon when the program develops their new intervention. Study results may also inform the development of other physical activity interventions designed for adults with persisting symptoms of a mild traumatic brain injury.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Alarie ◽  
Isabelle Gagnon ◽  
Enrico Quilico ◽  
Elizabeth Teel ◽  
Bonnie Swaine

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. van Markus-Doornbosch ◽  
E. Peeters ◽  
S. van der Pas ◽  
T. Vliet Vlieland ◽  
J. Meesters

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1193-1193
Author(s):  
Alia Westphal ◽  
Jason Bailie ◽  
Melissa Caswell ◽  
Juan Lopez ◽  
Angela Basham ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Service members with a history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) frequently report problems paying attention. In combat and training settings, visual attention is critical given the demand to warfighter performance. Many computerized cognitive rehabilitation programs exist, however the impact of their effectiveness on improving visual attention is unknown. Methods A randomized controlled trial consisted of 22 active-duty service members with a history of mTBI. Participants were randomized to Lumosity (N = 8) which focused on multiple cognitive domains or UCR which has a specific focus on visual attention (N = 14). Cognitive assessment was completed at baseline and following treatment. The Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB) Driving Scenes subtest was used as the primary assessment of visual attention. All participants passed a validity measure pre and post assessment. Results A one-way ANOVA revealed that performance on NAB Driving Scenes improved for all participants after treatment (F = 4.18, p = 0.046); however, when computer program type was analyzed there was no interaction (F = 0.32, p = 0.860). Participants who completed the UCR intervention improved from M = 41.64, SD = 11.58 to M = 46.79, SD = 14.52, Cohen’s d = 0.43. For the Lumosity condition, there was a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.46) from baseline (M = 38.63, SD = 14.33) to post treatment (M = 44.75, SD = 9.47) Conclusions The results indicated that both programs proved effective at improving visual attention symptoms. These findings provide support for the use of computerized cognitive rehabilitation programs as a form of intervention for mTBI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document