A Laboratory Comparison of Real-Time Measurement Methods for 10–100-nm Particle Size Distributions

2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 571-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. Hornsby ◽  
S. C. Pryor
2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 120602
Author(s):  
Qing Li Qing Li ◽  
He Huang He Huang ◽  
Feng Lin Feng Lin ◽  
Xingkun Wu Xingkun Wu

2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 1080-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohong Yao ◽  
Chak K. Chan ◽  
Ngai Ting Lau ◽  
P. S. Lau ◽  
Ming Fang

2011 ◽  
Vol 222 ◽  
pp. 74-77
Author(s):  
Ryszard Jabłoński ◽  
Roland Nowak

The paper presents the method, configuration and calibration of special system for measuring the size of particles. It is designed for real-time measurement of particles in the range up to 10µm, moving with velocity up to 15m/s and under pressure up to 20 bar. The method is based on measuring light scattered by single particle. We focused on studying the output from photomultiplier and finding relationships between pulse shape and particle size, and also the time intervals between pulses.


1990 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-73
Author(s):  
Ronald Peterson ◽  
James White II

The accurate determination of dust levels on optical surfaces is necessary to assess sensor system performance. A comparison study was made on several particle measurement methods including those based on direct imaging and light scattering. The effectiveness of removing the particles from the surface prior to determining particle size distributions was also assessed. These studies revealed that some methods, especially those requiring particle removal before analysis, are subject to large systematic errors affecting particle size distributions. Thus, an understanding of the particle measurement methods employed is necessary before any surface cleanliness or obstruction value assignments are accepted as a true representation of an optical surface contamination condition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document