Maximum Sustained Yield, Forest Rent or Faustmann: Does it Really Matter?

2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 457-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari Hyytiäinen ◽  
Olli Tahvonen
2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 1782-1796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry D Jacobson ◽  
Steven J Bograd ◽  
Richard H Parrish ◽  
Roy Mendelssohn ◽  
Franklin B Schwing

We used environmentally dependent surplus production (EDSP) models to test hypotheses linking changes in habitat area, carrying capacity and surplus production in California sardine (Sardinops sagax). Habitat area (with mean sea surface temperatures of 14–16 °C) was centered off Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia during July–December and off southern and central California during January–June. Habitat area increased during El Niño and decreased during La Niña events. EDSP models fit better than a conventional Fox surplus production model without environmental data. Our estimated fishing mortality rate at maximum sustained yield FMSY = 0.099·year–1 was consistent with other estimates. Maximum sustained yield (MSY) and stock biomass for MSY (BMSY) depend on habitat area and environmental conditions. Negative surplus production occurred when biomass was high and habitat area declined abruptly. Managers might monitor habitat area to anticipate changes in the California sardine stock and changes in the California Current ecosystem. Periods of high productivity appear easier to identify than periods of negative productivity. Models that incorporate environmental effects on both recruitment and survival and mortality of adult fish appear useful in studying climatic effects on fishery surplus production.


2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Rothschild ◽  
Yue Jiao

Attaining maximum sustained yield (MSY) is a central goal in U.S. fisheries management. To attain MSY, fishing mortality is maintained at FMSY and biomass at BMSY. Replacing FMSY and BMSY by “proxies” for FMSY and BMSY is commonplace. However, these proxies are not equivalent to FMSY and BMSY. The lack of equivalency is an important issue with regard to whether MSY is attained or whether biomass production is wasted. In this paper we study the magnitude of the equivalency. We compare FMSY/BMSY (calculated using the ASPIC toolbox) with the proxy estimates, F40%/B40%, published in GARM III. Our calculations confirm that in general the FMSY/BMSY calculations differ from the GARM III proxy estimates. The proxy estimates generally indicate that the stocks are overfished and are at relatively low biomasses, while the ASPIC estimates generally reflect the opposite: the stocks are not overfished and are at relatively high levels of abundance. In comparing the two approaches, the ASPIC estimates appeared favorable over the proxy estimates because 1) the ASPIC estimates involve only a few parameters in contrast to the many parameters estimated in the proxy approach, 2) “real variance” estimates for the proxy are not available so that it is difficult to evaluate the statistical adequacy of the proxy approach relative to the ASPIC approach, and 3) the proxy approach is based on many components (e.g., growth, stock and recruitment, etc.) that are subject to considerable uncertainty.


2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-307
Author(s):  
Jan Ohlberger ◽  
Samuel J. Brenkman ◽  
Patrick Crain ◽  
George R. Pess ◽  
Jeffrey J. Duda ◽  
...  

Life-cycle models combine several strengths for estimating population parameters and biological reference points of harvested species and are particularly useful for those exhibiting distinct habitat shifts and experiencing contrasting environments. Unfortunately, time series data are often limited to counts of adult abundance and harvest. By incorporating data from other populations and by dynamically linking the life-history stages, Bayesian life-cycle models can be used to estimate stage-specific productivities and capacities as well as abundance of breeders that produce maximum sustained yield (MSY). Using coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) as our case study, we show that incorporating information on marine survival variability from nearby populations can improve model estimates and affect management parameters such as escapement at MSY. We further show that the expected long-term average yield of a fishery managed for a spawner escapement target that produces MSY strongly depends on the average marine survival. Our results illustrate the usefulness of incorporating information from other sources and highlight the importance of accounting for variation in marine survival when making inferences about the management of Pacific salmon.


1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Resham Bdr Dangi

Regardless of size, Nepal is famous for floral and faunal diversity in the world. Out of 15,000 identified plant species in this country, more than 2000 plants have medicinal properties and more than 100 plant species are in commercial trade. There is growing concern in governmental and non-governmental organization to promote NTFP for improvements of rural livelihoods and forest conservation. However, field evidences do not demonstrate its meaningful contribution in forest conservation objective. This paper attempts to appraise the bottleneck issue in maintaining Maximum sustained yield (MSY) of viable NTFPs. The analysis is more focused on production characteristics rather than demand and institutional characteristics of NTFPs. Finally, the paper concludes by recommending few potential options for improvement. The suggested intervention includes preparation of new inventory guideline; improve forestry governance, training and extension for collectors, capacity building for forestry professional, and support for strengthening market infrastructure. Key Words: Non-timber forest products (NTFP), Market demand, Harvestable quota, Maximum sustained yield (MSY), Ecological impact and forest governance DOI: 10.3126/init.v2i1.2539 The Initiation Vol.2(1) 2008 pp165-171


1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles F. Cooper

The mass of carbon stored in forests is an important component of the global carbon cycle. A general model is developed to relate average carbon storage over the lifetime of a forest managed for sustained yield to the maximum biomass of the same forest at maturity. Point of inflection of stand growth is established using the Richards function. If a forest is managed for maximum sustained yield of biomass, mean lifetime carbon storage is about one-third that at maturity. Point of growth inflection has little effect on this fraction. When accumulation and decomposition of detritus after harvest are added, the fraction is about 0.5 in temperate deciduous forests, less in the tropics, and more in boreal forests. Harvest at financial maturity, by shortening the rotation, disproportionately reduces lifetime carbon storage, to perhaps 0.2 of the maximum. Nontimber values may affect carbon storage either positively or negatively. Forest regrowth and multispecies agricultural systems that include trees may account for more carbon storage in the tropics than is sometimes assumed.


1973 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 2100-2108
Author(s):  
T. Onarheim

Planning within a structural and geographical macro-perspective — defining desirable relations between regions, countries, and industrial sectors and units — should precede planning at the microlevel. Development aid by industrialized countries to the developing world should be conceived on the basis of an international division of labor and distribution of joint natural resources which appear optimal from a global standpoint. The global solution constitutes a point of departure for suboptimizing down the scale of geographical and sectoral levels.Managing common property fisheries to maximize net economic returns (i.e. by setting yield targets below the maximum sustained yield level) makes sense for the industrialized countries. As long as people in developing countries go hungry, however, and production of food resources below the maximum level cannot be made up by imports, a level of fishery resource exploitation below the maximum sustained yield does not seem to be justifiable on a global basis. Neither can maximum economic efficiency be accepted as the governing criterion for management, since this would undoubtedly work toward the creation of a virtual monopoly of exploitation by the countries with the most sophisticated technologies, in the absence of an international mechanism to guarantee that resulting economies would benefit others as well.Global redistribution of fish production and processing may be the most effective form of development aid, as the cost of "aid" given in this manner may be lower than that of financial and technical aid made available by industrialized countries. The "sacrifices" implied by this redistribution of natural wealth would not be great, as support for unprofitable or marginally profitable fisheries has often been no more than an impediment to general economic growth in the industrialized countries. Many developing countries, on the other hand, would enjoy considerable comparative cost advantages — because of their vicinity to rich, relatively unexploited fishing grounds — if only existing gaps in technology and know-how were being eliminated. Radical solutions along these lines do not appear feasible at the present time but attempts to move in the right direction through judicious application of aid measures, should not be neglected. In the absence of effective supranational decision-making bodies, it will be the responsibility of the international and bilateral agencies to ensure that resources made available to one country do not create "external diseconomies" for others. To achieve this goal, everybody will have to be educated on the benefits of planning fully integrated investments for large areas.Unless timely action is taken to harmonize development aid, investments, and fishing effort on a regional basis, the mistakes made and the sorry results produced in such areas as the North Atlantic will be repeated in areas of primary interest to developing countries and everybody will ultimately be a loser.


1963 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 647-678 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Larkin

The consequences of exploitation of either or both of a pair of competing species are examined using the Lotka-Volterra equations. The removal of a fixed proportion of a population on an instantaneous basis shifts the equilibrium population sizes for both the exploited species and its competitor. Similar shifts occur when both species are exploited. The maximum sustained yield of a species can be estimated under various degrees of exploitation of its competitor. The maximum combined sustained yield can be estimated for various relative values of the two species. From this analysis it is observed (1) harvesting only one species may provide a mistaken underestimate of capacity for sustained yield, (2) harvesting two species but relating yield to the fishing mortality rate of only one of the two may give a misleading overestimate of further capacity for sustained yield. Similar conclusions can be drawn if exploitation rate is proportional to abundance. A stochastic version of the model is given for study of the effects of exploitation on small populations of competitors.Fixed percentage exploitation and abundance proportional exploitation may be considered as depicting respectively the mode of action of density-independent and density-dependent factors. Accepting these parallels, the model may demonstrate some widely discussed properties of mechanisms of population regulation. Variability in factors both density dependent and density independent which are extrinsic to the biological system can be simulated in the model by random variates.A discrete time model is described which was used with a computer for study of transitions from one steady state to another and extinction probabilities. The computer results confirm the theoretical predictions of the model. In addition it is suggested that there is no apparent difference in the result when competitors are exposed to the same or different random sequences of environmental effects of the same average intensity.It is concluded that this formulation of interspecific competition together with variations should be applied to laboratory or natural situations to test its usefulness as a basis for prediction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document