scholarly journals Family outcomes in early intervention: results from a nationwide study in Portugal

2019 ◽  
Vol 190 (15) ◽  
pp. 2484-2492
Author(s):  
Carina Sofia Correia Leite ◽  
Ana Paula da Silva Pereira
2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela H. Epley ◽  
Jean Ann Summers ◽  
Ann P. Turnbull

Author(s):  
Donald B. Jr. Bailey ◽  
Raspa Melissa ◽  
Betsy P. Humphreys ◽  
Ann M. Sam

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 332-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna M. Noyes-Grosser ◽  
Scott R. Rosas ◽  
Alyssa Goldman ◽  
Batya Elbaum ◽  
Ray Romanczyk ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 496-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Raspa ◽  
Donald B. Bailey ◽  
Murrey G. Olmsted ◽  
Robin Nelson ◽  
Nyle Robinson ◽  
...  

This article reports data from a large-scale assessment using the Family Outcomes Survey with families participating in early intervention. The study was designed to determine how families describe themselves with regard to outcomes achieved, the extent to which outcomes are interrelated, and the extent to which child, family, and program factors are associated with outcomes. Families reported positive outcomes, but there was variability in their responses. Factor analysis revealed that outcomes clustered in two areas: (a) family knowledge and ability, and (b) family support and community services. Hierarchical linear models indicated race/ethnicity, income, time in early intervention, perception of early intervention, and family-centered services were related to family outcomes. Recommendations for how to best use survey data are discussed.


2017 ◽  
pp. 811-828
Author(s):  
Melissa Raspa ◽  
Amanda Wylie ◽  
Donald B. Bailey ◽  
Siobhan Colgan

1995 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Fyffe ◽  
Susana T. Gavidia-Payne ◽  
Jeffrey McCubbery

Families are increasingly understood as inter-related systems where each component interacts with other components in diverse ways. Contemporary research on families which have children with disabilities emphasises the complexity of families and the futility of searching for one characteristic of a family as predictive of family outcomes. The current study investigated the relationship between family needs, family supports, and demographic information for rural families who were eligible for early intervention services. The study did not attempt to review specific early intervention services, but rather to associate the characteristics of services which families found most and least effective. The results are discussed in terms of the practice of providing family-focused models of service delivery. This project was funded by the Golden North Centre, Spastic Society, Bendigo


2019 ◽  
pp. 105381511988341
Author(s):  
Rachelle Wicks ◽  
Jessica Paynter ◽  
Dawn Adams

Family outcomes of early intervention (EI) for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have received limited research attention to date. This study explored potential predictors of family outcomes and EI perceived helpfulness on the Family Outcomes Survey–Revised, utilizing an adapted double ABCX framework. Participants were 97 mothers of children aged 4 to 5 years ( M = 60.47 months; SD = 6.62; 87.6% male) participating in the Longitudinal Study of Australian Students with Autism (LASA). Parent and family factors were significant predictors, whereas child characteristics were largely nonsignificant beyond variance explained by parent and family factors. Findings highlight the importance of parent and family factors when considering family outcomes of EI and whether parents perceive benefits from their engagement with EI services. Overall, a shift in the focus of EI outcome evaluation is indicated, which views parents and families as meaningful to overall optimal EI outcomes.


2022 ◽  
pp. 027112142110647
Author(s):  
Ann M. Mickelson ◽  
Rebecca Hoffman

A family-capacity building approach to coaching, where providers support caregivers to embed identified strategies into daily routines and activities, is commonly embraced in Part C Early Intervention (EI). EI providers use several coaching strategies within this approach, yet few studies have reported process features, and coaching strategies are not well defined in the literature. We partnered in this Participatory Action Research (PAR) with current EI providers engaged in a year-long self-study process to provide an empirical account of one coaching strategy, joint planning, and related documentation. Our results indicate both providers and caregivers view documentation of joint planning as beneficial, highlight supports and challenges, and suggest that joint planning documentation holds significant promise for improving practice, data-based decision making, and progress monitoring of child and family outcomes including changes in caregiver capacity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document