Topical medical therapy and ocular perfusion pressure in open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 1421-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Rennie ◽  
Angus Wilkinson ◽  
Andrew White ◽  
Marinella Ruospo ◽  
Armando Teixeira-Pinto ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ko Eun Kim ◽  
Sohee Oh ◽  
Sung Uk Baek ◽  
Seong Joon Ahn ◽  
Ki Ho Park ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Rekha Khandelwal ◽  
Rachit Khandelwal ◽  
Dhananjay Raje ◽  
Deepa Kumar ◽  
Anand Rathi

2012 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
NM JANSONIUS ◽  
WD RAMDAS ◽  
RCW WOLFS ◽  
A HOFMAN ◽  
PTVM DE JONG ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 286-290
Author(s):  
Pallab Kumar Sen ◽  
Nazneen Khan ◽  
Md. Shafiqul Islam

Primary open angle glaucoma is the most common form of glaucoma and it remains asymptomatic until the late stage of the disease. The purpose of this study is to compare the mean ocular perfusion pressure with the primary open angle glaucoma. A total of 60 study subjects were divided into two following groups: a) newly diagnosed patients with primary open angle glaucoma (case) and b) age and sex-matched healthy volunteers (control). The intraocular pressure and blood pressure were measured 3 hourly from 8:00 am to 11:00 pm. The mean ocular perfusion pressure of the right eyes in untreated primary open angle glaucoma was 39.9 ± 7.5 mm Hg whereas it was 47.7 ± 7.7 mm Hg in the control. The odds ratio was 6.6 (95% CI, 2.1-20.5; p=0.002). The right eyes of untreated primary open angle glaucoma had 6.6 times more risk compared to the control group. The mean ocular perfusion pressure of left eyes in untreated primary open angle glaucoma was 39.9 ± 7.5 mm Hg and 48.6 ± 4.0 mm Hg in the control group. The odds ratio was 5.7 (95% CI, 1.8-17.5; p=0.004). The left eyes of untreated primary open angle glaucoma had 5.7 times more risk compared to control group. The findings revealed the evidence of vascular mechanism in glaucoma pathogenesis: Reduction of mean ocular perfusion pressure ≤48 mm Hg, may lead to daily repetitive ischemic insult to the optic nerve.


2012 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Wishal D. Ramdas ◽  
Roger C. W. Wolfs ◽  
Albert Hofman ◽  
Paulus T. V. M. de Jong ◽  
Johannes R. Vingerling ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Raheeba Pakeer Muhammed ◽  
Neeta Sidhan ◽  
Beena Thankappan

Introduction: Various haemodynamic factors have been implicated as pathophysiological mechanisms in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) other than raised Intraocular Pressure (IOP). However, the exact relationship still remains unclear. Aim: To examine the circadian pattern of Blood Pressure (BP), IOP and Ocular Perfusion Pressure (OPP) with the aim of understanding their relationships in a cohort of patients with POAG. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in which 44 cases of newly diagnosed, non-hypertensive patients with POAG were enrolled and categorised based on the severity of glaucoma. Recording of BP and IOP were done every 4th hourly during a 24 hour hospital stay. The Mean OPP (MOPP) was calculated as 2/3×Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)-IOP. Systolic OPP (SOPP) was calculated as Systolic BP-IOP and Diastolic OPP (DOPP) was calculated as Diastolic BP-IOP. The diurnal, nocturnal and 24 hour fluctuations were derived from the difference between the highest and lowest values within each period. Data was analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis of the variables with age and severity of POAG were performed Results: Significant positive correlation of the nocturnal fluctuations in MAP (r=0.533), SOPP (r=0.835), DOPP (r =0.768), MOPP (r=0.685) and 24 hour fluctuation in MOPP (r=0.636) were noted with severity of glaucoma on multivariate analysis. No significant correlation of these parameters with age was noted on multivariate analyses. Conclusion: Nocturnal dip in OPP was an important observation among patients with POAG, potentially contributing to its pathophysiology.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. e0215684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Uk Baek ◽  
Young Kook Kim ◽  
Ahnul Ha ◽  
Yong Woo Kim ◽  
Jinho Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document