Effectiveness of an aquatic exercise program and low-level laser therapy on articular cartilage in an experimental model of osteoarthritis in rats

2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 398-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Paulo Milares ◽  
Lívia Assis ◽  
Amanda Siqueira ◽  
Vitoria Claudino ◽  
Heloisa Domingos ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1401-1412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Airton Luiz Felizatti ◽  
Fernando Russo Costa do Bomfim ◽  
Julia Leme Bovo ◽  
Andrea Aparecida de Aro ◽  
Maria Esméria Corezzola do Amaral ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Ruiz Calatrava ◽  
J. M. Santisteban Valenzuela ◽  
R. J. Gómez-Villamandos ◽  
J. I. Redondo ◽  
J. C. Gómez-Villamandos ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Paschoal Prado ◽  
Richard Eloin Liebano ◽  
Bernardo Hochman ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Pinfildi ◽  
Lydia Masako Ferreira

PURPOSE: To develop an experimental model to be used in the study of low level Laser therapy on viability of random skin flap in rats. METHODS: The sample was 24 Wistar-EPM rats. The random skin flap measured 10 x 4 cm and a plastic sheet was interposed between the flap and donor site. Group 1 (control) underwent sham irradiation with diode laser (830 nm). Group 2 was submitted to laser irradiation with diode laser (830 nm). The animals were submitted to Laser therapy with 36 J/cm² energy density (72 seconds) immediately after the surgery and on the four subsequent days. The probe was usually held in contact with the skin flap surface on a point at 2.5 cm cranial from the flap base. On the seventh postoperative day, the percentage of necrotic area was measured and calculated. RESULTS: Group 1 reached an average necrotic area of 48.86%, Group 2 - 23.14%. After the statistic analysis, compared with the control group, Group 2 showed a statistically significant increase in survival area (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The experimental model proved to be reliable to be used in the study of effects of low level laser therapy in random skin flap in rats.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 1159-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Brassolatti ◽  
Ana Laura Martins de Andrade ◽  
Paulo Sérgio Bossini ◽  
Albaiza Nicoletti Otterço ◽  
Nivaldo Antônio Parizotto

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 1985-1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romildo Torres-Silva ◽  
Rodrigo Alvaro Brandão Lopes-Martins ◽  
Jan Magnus Bjordal ◽  
Lucio Frigo ◽  
Rachid Rahouadj ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (22;3) ◽  
pp. 241-254
Author(s):  
Yi-Chun Kuan

Background: Fibromyalgia is a chronic disorder characterized by widespread pain and tenderness. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT), an emerging nonpharmacological treatment, has been used for relieving musculoskeletal or neuropathic pain. Objective: The objective of this review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of LLLT on patients with fibromyalgia. Study Design: This study involved systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Setting: This study examined all RCTs evaluating the effect of LLLT on fibromyalgia. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating the effect of LLLT on patients with fibromyalgia. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published before August 2018. RCTs meeting our selection criteria were included. The methodological quality of the RCTs was evaluated according to the Cochrane risk-for-bias method. Review Manager version 5.3 was used to perform the meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were the total scores on the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), pain severity, and number of tender points. The secondary outcomes were changes in fatigue, stiffness, anxiety, and depression. Standardized mean difference (SMD), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and P values were calculated for outcome analysis. Results: We identified 9 RCTs that included 325 fibromyalgia patients undergoing LLLT or placebo laser treatment with or without an exercise program. The meta-analysis showed that patients receiving LLLT demonstrated significantly greater improvement in their FIQ scores (SMD: 1.16; 95% CI, 0.64-1.69), pain severity (SMD: 1.18; 95% CI, 0.82-1.54), number of tender points (SMD: 1.01; 95% CI, 0.49-1.52), fatigue (SMD: 1.4; 95% CI, 0.96-1.84), stiffness (SMD: 0.92; 95% CI, 0.36-1.48), depression (SMD: 1.46; 95% CI, 0.93-2.00), and anxiety (SMD: 1.46; 95% CI, 0.45-2.47) than those receiving placebo laser. Furthermore, when compared with the standardized exercise program alone, LLLT plus the standardized exercise program provided no extra advantage in the relief of symptoms. On the other hand, the results of the only RCT using combined LLLT/LED phototherapy showed significant improvement in most outcomes except for depression when compared to placebo. When compared with pure exercise therapy, combined LLLT/LED phototherapy plus exercise therapy had additional benefits in reducing the severity of pain, number of tender points, and fatigue. Limitations: There were some limitations in this review, mostly because of the low-to-middle methodological quality of the selected studies; for example, there was no clear allocation process and only patients were blinded in most studies. In addition, one study used per-protocol analysis with a 20% loss to follow-up. On the other hand, the differences in laser types, energy sources, exposure times, and associated medication status in these studies may have resulted in some heterogeneity. Conclusions: Our results provided the most up-to-date and relevant evidence regarding the effects of LLLT in fibromyalgia. LLLT is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for fibromyalgia. Key words: Low-level laser therapy, fibromyalgia, meta-analysis, FIQ, pain, tender points, exercise


Author(s):  
Suellen de Oliveira Veronez Silva ◽  
Lívia Assis ◽  
Paula Fernanda Gallani Martin Del Campo ◽  
Katherine Chuere Nunes Duarte ◽  
Flavia de Oliveira ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Erasmo Assumpção Neto ◽  
Nicole C. Rigonato-Oliveira ◽  
Aurileia A. Brito ◽  
Luana B. Vitoretti ◽  
Gabriel Moraes ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilton Maciel Mangueira ◽  
Murilo Xavier ◽  
Renato Aparecido de Souza ◽  
Miguel Angel Castillo Salgado ◽  
Landulfo Silveira ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimee L. Thornton ◽  
Cailee W. McCarty ◽  
Mollie-Jean Burgess

Clinical Scenario:Shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal condition that affects up to 25% of the general population. Shoulder pain can be caused by any number of underlying conditions including subacromial impingement syndrome, rotator-cuff tendinitis, and biceps tendinitis. Regardless of the specific pathology, pain is generally the number 1 symptom associated with shoulder injuries and can severely affect daily activities and quality of life of patients with these conditions. Two of the primary goals in the treatment of these conditions are reducing pain and increasing shoulder range of motion (ROM).3 Conservative treatment has traditionally included a therapeutic exercise program targeted at increasing ROM, strengthening the muscles around the joint, proprioceptive training, or some combination of those activities. In addition, these exercise programs have been supplemented with other interventions including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroid injections, manual therapy, activity modification, and a wide array of therapeutic modalities (eg, cryotherapy, EMS, ultrasound). Recently, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been used as an additional modality in the conservative management of patients with shoulder pain. However, the true effectiveness of LLLT in decreasing pain and increasing function in patients with shoulder pain is unclear.Focused Clinical Question:Is low-level laser therapy combined with an exercise program more effective than an exercise program alone in the treatment of adults with shoulder pain?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document