Diagnostic performance of neck circumference to identify overweight and obesity as defined by body mass index in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunming Ma ◽  
Rui Wang ◽  
Yue Liu ◽  
Qiang Lu ◽  
Xiaoli Liu ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e009998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reem A Al Khalifah ◽  
Nicole E De Long ◽  
Ivan D Florez ◽  
Lawrence Mbuagbaw ◽  
Katherine M Morrison

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e87896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthik Darmasseelane ◽  
Matthew J. Hyde ◽  
Shalini Santhakumaran ◽  
Chris Gale ◽  
Neena Modi

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. e017144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennette P Moreno ◽  
Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im ◽  
Elizabeth M Vaughan ◽  
Tom Baranowski

IntroductionIn previous studies, it has been found that on average, children consistently gained weight during the summer months at an increased rate compared with the 9-month school year. This contributed to an increased prevalence of overweight and obesity in children. Several obesity-related interventions have occurred during or targeting the summer months. We propose to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of obesity prevention and treatment interventions for school-age children conducted during the summer or targeting the summer months when children are not in school on their body mass index (BMI), or weight-related behaviours.Methods and analysesA literature search will be conducted by the first author (JPM) using MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Proquest Dissertations and Theses databases from the date of inception to present. Studies must examine interventions that address the modification or promotion of weight-related behaviours (eg, dietary patterns, eating behaviours, physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour or sleep) and target school-age children (ages 5–18). The primary outcomes will be changes from baseline to postintervention and/or the last available follow-up measurement in weight, BMI, BMI percentile, standardised BMI or per cent body fat. Secondary outcomes will include changes in dietary intake, PA, sedentary behaviour or sleep. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised and non-randomised studies, as appropriate.Ethics and disseminationBecause this is a protocol for a systematic review, ethics approval will not be required. The findings will be disseminated via presentations at scientific conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. All amendments to the protocol will be documented and dated and reported in the PROSPERO trial registry.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42016041750


2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 791-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
D O Okorodudu ◽  
M F Jumean ◽  
V M Montori ◽  
A Romero-Corral ◽  
V K Somers ◽  
...  

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1378
Author(s):  
Andrés Godoy-Cumillaf ◽  
Paola Fuentes-Merino ◽  
Armando Díaz-González ◽  
Judith Jiménez-Díaz ◽  
Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno ◽  
...  

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the effect of physical activity only with that of physical activity plus diet interventions on body mass index (BMI) in Latin American children and adolescents. We searched the Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Scielo databases from their inception until March 2020, including studies examining the effect of physical activity or physical activity plus diet interventions on BMI in children and adolescents and based on data from intervention studies. The DerSimonian and Laird method was used to compute a pooled standardized mean difference for BMI in terms of effect size (ES) and respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eighteen studies were included. Analyses were performed based on intervention (four studies were included for physical activity only and four studies were included for physical activity plus diet). In the analysis of physical activity only versus control, there was no effect on BMI (ES = 0.00; 95% CI −0.17–0.17, I2 = 0.0%; p = 0.443). In the analysis of physical activity plus diet versus control, there was a decrease in BMI in favour of the intervention group (ES = −0.28; 95% CI −0.42–−0.14, I2 = 74.5%; p = 0.001). When ES was estimated considering only the effect in intervention groups, there was no evidence of a decrease in BMI (ES = −0.17; 95% CI −0.44–0.11, I2 = 84.5%; p < 0.001) for physical activity only (eight studies). However, there was a statistically significant decrease in BMI (ES = −0.30; 95% CI −0.50–0.11, I2 = 95.8%; p < 0.001) for physical activity plus diet (ten studies). Some limitations of this review could compromise our results, but the main limitation that should be stated is the quality of the studies (mainly medium/moderate), especially as physical activity and diet interventions cannot be blinded, compromising the quality of these studies. In summary, this meta-analysis offers evidence that physical activity plus diet interventions produced a reduction in BMI in Latin American children and adolescents, but physical activity only interventions did not.


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 623-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liane B. Azevedo ◽  
Jonathan Ling ◽  
Istvan Soos ◽  
Shannon Robalino ◽  
Louisa Ells

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document