Competitive debate as competency-based learning: civic engagement and next-generation assessment in the era of the common core learning standards

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 420-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan McIntosh ◽  
Myra Milam
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 105-105
Author(s):  
Patricia Velasco ◽  

"Are you listening to me?” We often hear this question in classrooms where teachers are aiming to garner the students’ attention. Listening is also emphasized in the Speaking and Listening Common Core State Standards as well as in the Next Generation Learning Standards. It seems that the students are the ones expected to do all the listening while teachers do most of the talking.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura S. Tortorelli ◽  
Hope K. Gerde ◽  
Rebecca Rohloff ◽  
Gary E. Bingham

AERA Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 233285842110242
Author(s):  
Joshua M. Rosenberg ◽  
Conrad Borchers ◽  
Elizabeth B. Dyer ◽  
Daniel Anderson ◽  
Christian Fischer

System-wide educational reforms are difficult to implement in the United States, but despite the difficulties, reforms can be successful, particularly when they are associated with broad public support. This study reports on the nature of the public sentiment expressed about a nationwide science education reform effort, the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Through the use of data science techniques to measure the sentiment of posts on Twitter about the NGSS (N = 565,283), we found that public sentiment about the NGSS is positive, with only 11 negative posts for every 100 positive posts. In contrast to findings from past research and public opinion polling on the Common Core State Standards, sentiment about the NGSS has become more positive over time—and was especially positive for teachers. We discuss what this positive sentiment may indicate about the success of the NGSS in light of opposition to the Common Core State Standards.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document