FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF USSR'S HIGHER EDUCATION BASED ON THE DECISIONS OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY AND THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS OF USSR

1979 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 39-41
Author(s):  
I. G. Ivantsov

The Article is devoted to the secret correspondence of the CPSU (b), which began its existence in the early period of Soviet power. In the USSR, 1922-1923 were secretly carried out of the party and state reform, in which was installed dictatorship of the ruling Communist party. The old model of domination of individual Bolshevik leaders were eliminated. All power concentrated in the hands of few of its leaders at the top. As further development, there is a simple and archaic system of government which is not bound to any laws or control of the company. Whoever was at the top, dispose of everything and governs all. The basis of the Soviet state was the hierarchy of party committees headed by appointed secretaries. In addition, after the entry of Stalin in the post of Secretary General of the relation of the Supreme party organs to the party apparatus on the ground began to carry secret correspondence between them was classified. Circle functionaries who were sent extracts of the minutes of the Central Committee of the CPSU (b), the party committees and individual orders of the secretaries of the Central Committee and party committees, persons carrying out intra-party correspondence was strictly limited.


2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aistė Galaunytė

On 28 September 1987, the resolution No. 264 On Further Development of Individual Housing in the Republic passed by the Central Committee of the Council of Ministers of the Lithuanian SSR restored the typological group of private dwelling-houses to Lithuanian towns after a break of nearly three decades. Post-modern trends in architecture that prevailed in western countries at that time reached Lithuania in the form of limited spectrum of architectural press. Architectural expression of individual dwelling-houses in Lithuania relied specifically on projects published in foreign magazines (mostly, of Japan, the U.S.A and Western Europe), and later – in the local periodicals. Different features of such analogous architecture were adapted in Lithuanian dwelling-houses in different ways: the spatial structure of the building was used and interpreted in ones, while in the others – only certain specific details, most often published in such professional press. Three groups of individual dwelling-houses were formed: the elite – benchmark-type, typical -adapted and self-taught architecture. They represented examples of architecture, which over the ten-year’s period were built in parallel and intense mode, until finally the economic conditions prevalent in the post-Soviet Lithuania led to the more practical approach to one’s housing, and the style of post-modernism became unfashionable in Lithuania just like in the remaining part of the world. Santrauka 1987 m. rugsėjo 28 d. LKP CK ir LTSR ministrų tarybos nutarimas Nr. 264 „Dėl individualinės gyvenamųjų namų statybos tolesnio plėtojimo Respublikoje“ į Lietuvos architektūrą po beveik trijų dešimtmečių pertraukos vėl sugrąžino individualaus būsto tipologinę grupę. Tuo metu Vakarų pasaulyje vyravusios postmodernizmo stiliaus tendencijos Lietuvą pasiekdavo daugiausiai riboto spektro profesinės periodikos pavidalu. Lietuvoje individualių gyvenamųjų namų architektūrinė raiška būtent ir rėmėsi užsienio (Japonijos, JAV, Vakarų Europos), vėliau – vietinėje periodikoje publikuotais postmodernizmo stiliaus gyvenamųjų namų projektais. Skirtinguose gyvenamuosiuose namuose analogų savybės buvo pritaikomos nevienodai: vienuose perimama ir interpretuojama pastato erdvinė struktūra, kituose – tik dažniausiai publikuotos detalės. Susiformuoja trys individualių gyvenamųjų namų architektūros grupės: elitinė etaloninė, tipinė adaptuota ir savamokslė. Joms atstovaujantys architektūros pavyzdžiai per dešimties metų laikotarpį statyti lygiagrečiai ir intensyviai, kol galiausiai postsovietinėje šalyje susiklosčiusios ekonominės aplinkybės paskatino praktiškesnį požiūrį į gyvenamąjį būstą, o postmodernizmo stilius, lygiai kaip ir likusiame pasaulyje, tapo nebemadingas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document