Effects of dietary fat inclusion at two energy levels on reproductive performance, milk compositions and blood profiles in lactating sows

2008 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 121-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Park ◽  
Y. X. Yang ◽  
J. Y. Choi ◽  
S. Y. Yoon ◽  
S. S. Ahn ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 137-138
Author(s):  
Morgan T Thayer ◽  
Jacob A Richert ◽  
Karissa N Rulon ◽  
Matthew D Asmus ◽  
Daniel B Jones ◽  
...  

Abstract Forty-seven sows and their progeny were used to determine if feeding gestating and lactating sows a Bacillus licheniformis direct-fed microbial (DFM), an organic acid blend of medium chain and short chain fatty acids (OA), or in combination improves sow lactation feed and water intake, litter growth, and subsequent reproductive performance. On approximately d80 of gestation, sows were fed one of four diets in a 2 x 2 factorial design: 1) gestation control (CON; 0.55% SID Lysine), 2) CON with DFM (1.6x109 CFU/kg of complete feed), 3) CON with 0.4% OA, 4) CON with both DFM and OA. Dietary treatments were also fed throughout lactation (1.00% SID Lysine) starting on approximately d112 of gestation when sows entered farrowing facility. There was a tendency (P = 0.079) for DFM to decrease the amount of sow body weight loss in lactation by approximately 6% compared to sows not consuming the DFM, likely related to DFM sows numerically (P = 0.124) consuming 8.4% more feed during d7-14 of lactation. Sows fed the OA diets had fewer mummies/litter (P = 0.038) compared to diets not containing OA. Sows fed diets with the DFM gave birth to lighter pigs born alive (P = 0.003) compared to non-DFM fed sows, and a tendency for an interaction (P = 0.092) existed where feeding OA+DFM lessened the decrease in born alive BW. There was an interaction tendency (P = 0.133) where sows fed DFM returned to estrus 22 hours sooner than CON, but only 8 hours sooner when sows were fed the OA+DFM diet. In conclusion, feeding a Bacillus licheniformis DFM to sows may decrease pig born alive weight but reduce sow BW loss through 6.4% more lactation feed intake, quickening the return to estrus. Feeding the OA alone or in combination did not improve sow reproductive and litter growth performance in this study, and may require a larger sample size.


1954 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1159-1163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Dymsza ◽  
R.V. Boucher ◽  
M.G. McCartney

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. 460-460
Author(s):  
J. M. Romo ◽  
J. A. Romo ◽  
R. Barajas ◽  
H. R. Güémez ◽  
I. Enriquez ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1004-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. S. Jin ◽  
S. W. Jung ◽  
J. C. Jang ◽  
W. L. Chung ◽  
J. H. Jeong ◽  
...  

1980 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 837-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. Lemenager ◽  
W. H. Smith ◽  
T. G. Martin ◽  
W. L. Singleton ◽  
J. R. Hodges

1991 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Makarechian ◽  
P. F. Arthur ◽  
M. A. Price

Eighty-one heifer calves weaned at an average age of 6 mo were used to study the effect of postweaning zeranol implantation, on the growth and reproductive performance of heifers fed to grow slowly on three dietary energy levels. Forty heifers were implanted with 36 mg of zeranol at 30 d and again at 120 d postweaning. The remaining heifers were used as ummplanted controls. Within the implanted and control groups, heifers were subdivided into three groups and fed either a low, medium or high energy diet, which provided approximately 105, 130 and 160%, respectively, of NRC maintenance energy requirement, until 1 yr of age. The heifers were then turned out to pasture with hay supplementation. Heifers were exposed to bulls for 35 d at approximately 14 mo of age. Zeranol had no significant effect on growth. The effect of zeranol on the reproductive traits studied was not significant, although the trend was that the zeranol implanted heifers had lower calf crop born (52.3 vs. 63.6%) and lower incidence of calving difficulty (18.5 vs. 32.1%) than control heifers. The level of energy in the diet had a significant (P < 0.01) effect on growth of the heifers, with those on the high energy diet having the highest mean growth rate, but no significant effect on reproductive performance. Key words: Zeranol, dietary energy, growth, reproduction, heifers


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document