Exploring EFL learners` developmental errors in academic writing through face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated dynamic assessment

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shokoufeh Vakili ◽  
Saman Ebadi
Keyword(s):  
Academic Writing ◽  
Dynamic Assessment ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Computer Mediated

scholarly journals Comparative study of the effect of face-to-face and computer mediated conversation modalities on student engagement: speaking skill in focus

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Bagheri ◽  
Zohre Mohamadi Zenouzagh
Keyword(s):  
Student Engagement ◽  
Placement Test ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Transcription Analysis ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Computer Mediated ◽  
Speaking Skill ◽  
L1 Use ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

AbstractThis study investigated the potentials of face –to- face and computer mediated conversation (CMC) as two speaking modalities on students’ engagement. To this end, 30 Iranian male intermediate EFL learners were selected on the basis of their performance on OPT (Oxford Placement Test) and assigned into the research groups. The progression of face- to- face and CMC groups from limited to elaborate engagement at verbal, paralinguistic and functional levels was assessed using transcription analysis in face-to-face group and chat log analysis in CMC group. The limited and elaborate student engagement indicators in two modalities were identified via Maxqda software. The results of Maxqda analysis indicated that limited engagement was associated with appeal for help, silence, pauses and hesitations, focus on syntax, involvement with procedural talk and L1 use. Respectively, elaborate engagement was associated with avoiding L1 use, focus on discourse, involvement with actual talk and strategic discourse management rather than pause and silence. Chi-square analysis on frequency of indicators of limited and elaborate engagements on verbal, paralinguistic and functional levels indicated that limited and elaborate engagements occurred with different proportions in face-to-face and CMC conversations. Teaching practitioners would benefit the findings of the study since the findings illustrate how students’ engagement in learning evolves and how speaking modalities may impact the pattern of students’ engagement over time. The finding also suggest one way for improving student engagement without over-intervening of teachers is using modalities such as forums where the teacher presence is limited and students have to manage the discourse themselves which in turn increases student engagement.

The Nature of ‘Talk’ in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication in a Vietnamese Tertiary EFL Context

2012 ◽  
pp. 89-112
Author(s):  
Long V. Nguyen ◽  
Cynthia White
Keyword(s):  
Computer Mediated Communication ◽  
Group Processes ◽  
Mediated Communication ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Online Groups ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Computer Mediated ◽  
Central Vietnam ◽  
First Time ◽  
Level Of Analysis

This classroom-based research aims to investigate the nature and quality of talk in synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC) among Vietnamese tertiary EFL learners. Participants included 60 students in their sixth semester of an eight-semester BA in TESOL program in a large university in Central Vietnam. Using a sociocultural lens, the nature of discussion was compared in two modes of exchanges, SCMC versus face-to-face (FTF), through analysis of discussion transcripts supported by questionnaire data, interviews and observations. The first level of analysis, participation, revealed that the online students, collaborating in an academic task for the first time via SCMC, produced fewer words, but spent more time, during the discussion process. More equal contribution was a marked feature of the SCMC mode. For the second level of analysis examining the interactional nature and pattern of discussion, transcripts were analyzed according to socioaffective, organizational and sociocognitive themes, and their emergent subcategories. Clear differences were evident between the two settings regarding group processes, leadership, negotiation and consensus. It is argued that for these tertiary Vietnamese EFL learners, the FTF groups were more product-oriented in the discussion task, while the online groups presented a more process-oriented style of learning.

The Nature of 'Talk' in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication in a Vietnamese Tertiary EFL Context

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 14-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long V. Nguyen ◽  
Cynthia White
Keyword(s):  
Computer Mediated Communication ◽  
Group Processes ◽  
Mediated Communication ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
Online Groups ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Computer Mediated ◽  
Central Vietnam ◽  
First Time ◽  
Level Of Analysis

This classroom-based research aims to investigate the nature and quality of talk in synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC) among Vietnamese tertiary EFL learners. Participants included 60 students in their sixth semester of an eight-semester BA in TESOL program in a large university in Central Vietnam. Using a sociocultural lens, the nature of discussion was compared in two modes of exchanges, SCMC versus face-to-face (FTF), through analysis of discussion transcripts supported by questionnaire data, interviews and observations. The first level of analysis, participation, revealed that the online students, collaborating in an academic task for the first time via SCMC, produced fewer words, but spent more time, during the discussion process. More equal contribution was a marked feature of the SCMC mode. For the second level of analysis examining the interactional nature and pattern of discussion, transcripts were analyzed according to socioaffective, organizational and sociocognitive themes, and their emergent subcategories. Clear differences were evident between the two settings regarding group processes, leadership, negotiation and consensus. It is argued that for these tertiary Vietnamese EFL learners, the FTF groups were more product-oriented in the discussion task, while the online groups presented a more process-oriented style of learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document