scholarly journals Th1/Th2cytokines and ICAM–1 levels post-liver transplant do not predict early rejection

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Granot ◽  
A. Tarcsafalvi ◽  
S. Emre ◽  
P. Sheiner ◽  
S. Guy ◽  
...  

Th1derived cytokines IFN-γ and IL–2, Th2cytokine IL–4, and ICAM–1 have been implicated in liver allograft rejection. In order to determine whether monitoring of cytokine profiles during the first days post-liver transplant can predict early rejection we measured IFN-gg, IL–2, sIL–2 receptor, IL–4 and ICAM–1 in 22 patients, in plasma samples obtained within 4h after liver perfusion (baseline) and between postoperative days (POD) 3–6. ICAM–1 and sIL–2R levels at POD 3–6 were significantly higher than at baseline but did not differ in presence or absence of rejection. Mean percentage increase of ICAM–1 levels was significantly lower in patients with Muromonab-C3Orthoclone OKT3(J.C. Health Care) (OKT3) whereas percentage increase of sIL–2R levels was higher in OKT3-treated patients. IFN-γ levels at POD 3–6 increased from baseline while IL–4 levels were unchanged. Levels of IFN-γ, IL–4 and their ratios did not correlate with rejection or immunosuppressive therapy. Thus, Th1/Th2cytokine monitoring during the first week post-transplant does not predict early rejection and immunosuppressive therapy is the predominant factor affecting ICAM and sIL–2R levels after liver transplantation.

Author(s):  
A. V. Shabunin ◽  
S. P. Loginov ◽  
P. A. Drozdov ◽  
I. V. Nesterenko ◽  
D. A. Makeev ◽  
...  

Rationale. To date, liver transplantation is the most effective method of treating end-stage liver failure, and therefore this treatment has become widespread throughout the world. However, due to the improvement in the quality of transplant care and an increase in the long-term survival of patients, the development of concomitant pathology, which often requires medical treatment, is inevitably associated with a higher life expectancy of liver transplant recipients. Thus, in patients who underwent liver transplantation, there is. a significant increase in the incidence of dyslipidemia. However, a long-term immunosuppressive therapy in organ transplant patients can adversely modify the effect of the prescribed drugs, which requires careful monitoring and consideration of drug interactions.Purpose. Using a clinical example to demonstrate the importance of taking drug interactions into account in the treatment of patients after organ transplantation receiving immunosuppressive drugs.Material and methods. In the presented clinical case, a patient after orthotopic liver transplantation performed in 2005 underwent a staged treatment of cicatricial stricture of choledochal anastomosis in the S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital. During the following hospitalization, the patient complained of minor muscle pain when walking. At doctor's visit 3 weeks before hospitalization, a local physician prescribed therapy with atorvastatin 10 mg per day due to an increase in blood plasma cholesterol levels. The patient underwent removal of the self-expanding nitinol stent. During the follow-up examination, the patient had no evidence of an impaired bile outflow, however, muscle pain and weakness progressively increased, the rate of diuresis decreased, and in the biochemical analysis of blood there was an abrupt increase in the concentration of creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase. Atorvastatin was canceled, a diagnosis of acute non-traumatic rhabdomyolysis was established, treatment with hemodialysis and plasma exchange was started on 03/05/2020. The last session of renal replacement therapy was 03/30/20.Results. With the restoration of the diuresis rate, there was a spontaneous decrease in the level of creatinine to 170 μmol/L. The patient was discharged with satisfactory renal and hepatic function. The pain syndrome completely resolved. Conclusion. Drug interactions between atorvastatin and cyclosporine have resulted in acute rhabdomyolysis with life-threatening consequences. This once again confirms the importance of taking drug interactions into account when managing patients after solid organ transplantation.


2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Aušrinė Barakauskienė ◽  
Arvydas Laurinavičius ◽  
Kęstutis Strupas ◽  
Arida Buivydienė ◽  
Vitalijus Sokolovas ◽  
...  

Aušrinė Barakauskienė1, Arvydas Laurinavičius1, Kęstutis Strupas2, Arida Buivydienė2, Vitalijus Sokolovas2, Marius Paškonis2, Jonas Valantinas2, Jonas Jurgaitis21 Valstybinis patologijos centras, P. Baublio g. 5, LT-08406 Vilnius2 Vilniaus universiteto Santariškių klinikų Gastroenterologijos,urologijos ir abdominalinės chirurgijos klinika,Santariškių g. 2, LT-08661 VilniusEl paštas: [email protected]; [email protected] Įvadas / tikslas Atmetimo reakcijos morfologinių parametrų pokyčių tikslus vertinimas gali užtikrinti ligonio gyvenimo kokybę po kepenų transplantacijos. Straipsnio tikslas yra pateikti ūminio kepenų transplantato atmetimo diferencinės diagnostikos iš bioptato literatūros apžvalgą ir pasidalyti savo praktine patirtimi vertinant nulinę kepenų biopsiją bei ūminę (ląstelinę) atmetimo reakciją bioptate. Metodai Straipsnyje apibendrinamos teorinės žinios, įgytos Heidelbergo universiteto Patologijos institute, dalyvaujant Leonardo da Vinčio projekto mokymo programoje „Kepenų transplantacijos įgūdžių tobulinimas“ 2006 m. balandį – birželį. Šios žinios susijusios su kepenų biopsijos taikymo ortotopinėje kepenų transplantacijoje prognozine verte. Straipsnyje pateikiami morfologiniai vaistų sukelti pokyčiai ir apibendrinamas vaistų atsakas į gydymą. Rezultatai Remiantis asmenine patirtimi nurodoma nulinės biopsijos praktinė reikšmė, pateikiama ūminio (ląstelinio) atmetimo morfologinė diagnostika. Aprašomi ir šešiuose paveiksluose pavaizduojami šios reakcijos pagrindiniai komponentai, jų diferencinė diagnostika, nurodomi praktiški laipsniavimo sistemos principai. Išvados Atmetimo reakcija turi būti vertinama kompleksiškai – tai gastroenterologų, chirurgų, imunologų ir patologų komandos darbas. Gebėjimas kompleksiškai įvertinti ir interpretuoti tiek klinikinius, tiek morfologinius pokyčių parametrus gali užtikrinti ligonio gyvenimo kokybę po kepenų transplantacijos. Pagrindiniai žodžiai: ortotopinė kepenų transplantacija, ūminė (ląstelinė) atmetimo reakcija, Banff schema, nulinė biopsija, atmetimo aktyvumo indeksas The differential diagnosis of acute liver allograft rejection in the biopsy Aušrinė Barakauskienė1, Arvydas Laurinavičius1, Kęstutis Strupas2, Arida Buivydienė2, Vitalijus Sokolovas2, Marius Paškonis2, Jonas Valantinas2, Jonas Jurgaitis21 National Centre of Pathology, P. Baublio g. 5, LT-08406 Vilnius, Lithuania2 Kaunas University of Medicine,Insitute for Biomedical Research,Eivenių g. 4, LT-50009 Kaunas, LithuaniaE-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Background / objective Histological assessment of liver biopsies provides important information for the management of patients undergoing liver transplantation and for the differential diagnosis of other diseases. The aim of the article is to summarize the theoretical knowledge obtained from the University of Heidelberg at the Institute of Pathology participating in the Leonardo da Vinci project “Competence improvement in liver transplantation” in April–Juny 2006, and our own experience to determine acute (cellular) rejection, “time-zero” biopsy. Results There are three main morphological criteria of the rejection activity index to be evaluated: portal tract inflammation, bile duct damage and venous endothelial inflammation. The main histological features of acute (cellular) rejection are described and assessed in six pictures, and a practical approach to the scoring system (Banff scheme) is presented. In addition, there are described morphological changes caused by drugs as a response to treatment. Conclusions The assessment of acute (cellular) rejection should be carried out together with clinicians, surgeons, immunologists and pathologists working in team. The capability to evaluate all the clinical and morphological data in complex ensures the quality of life of the patient after liver transplantation. Key words: liver allograft rejection, acute (cellular) rejection, Banff scheme, “time-zero” biopsy, rejection activity index


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Kriss ◽  
Hugo Rosen

The liver is a multifunctional organ responsible for complex metabolic and immune functions. Although not a classic lymphoid organ, the liver is enriched with traditional immune cells as well as parenchymal and nonparenchymal cells that play a key role in immune homeostasis. Due to its location and unique anatomic structure, the liver must finely balance immunity and tolerance to avoid undue inflammation in the setting of constant antigenic exposure from portal blood flow while maintaining appropriate immunity against pathogens. Since the first successful liver transplantation in humans in 1967 at the University of Colorado, our knowledge of hepatic immunity and tolerance, in the context of both liver disease and liver transplantation, has evolved dramatically. With these advancements, therapeutic modalities have been developed that have revolutionized the care of liver transplant recipients.  In Part 2: Application to Liver Allograft Immunity, we apply the basic principles of liver immunology and allorecognition to our current management of liver transplant recipients in the context of both immunosuppression and the holy grail of transplantation, operational tolerance. This review contains 4 figures, 3 tables, and 32 references Key Words: adaptive immunity; allograft rejection; allograft tolerance; allorecognition; antigen presenting cells; immunosuppression; innate immunity; liver transplantation; T lymphocytes


1994 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 2174-2185 ◽  
Author(s):  
R H Wiesner

Abstract Despite recent improvements in immunosuppressive therapy, hepatic allograft rejection remains a major cause of morbidity and late graft loss in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Although some biochemical tests suggest hepatic allograft damage, the gold standard for defining rejection remains based on morphologic findings. Acute cellular rejection usually occurs within the first 3 weeks posttransplantation and the incidence varies between 40% and 70%. Ductopenic rejection occurs in 5-10% of patients undergoing initial liver transplantation and usually occurs between 6 weeks and 6 months after the procedure. Induction and maintenance of immunosuppression with triple-drug therapy (cyclosporine, prednisone, and azathioprine) and other combinations that include anti-lymphocyte preparations have led to an overall decrease in the incidence of both cellular and ductopenic rejection. In addition, the availability of FK506 as a rescue therapy has saved grafts in some patients experiencing chronic (ductopenic) rejection. Overall, the correlation between the degree of biochemical liver dysfunction and the presence and severity of histologic rejection remains poor. Histologic severity of rejection, however, suggests which patients will require more immunosuppressive therapy and which patients may need antilymphocyte therapy to control the rejection episode. Some rejection episodes remain resistant to all known therapy and eventually lead to graft loss. New immunosuppressive agents and regimens are needed to improve graft and patient survival, decrease the incidence of cellular and ductopenic rejection, minimize drug-related side effects and complications, and reduce the high cost of immunosuppressive therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryosuke Nakano ◽  
Lillian M. Tran ◽  
David A. Geller ◽  
Camila Macedo ◽  
Diana M. Metes ◽  
...  

Liver allograft recipients are more likely to develop transplantation tolerance than those that receive other types of organ graft. Experimental studies suggest that immune cells and other non-parenchymal cells in the unique liver microenvironment play critical roles in promoting liver tolerogenicity. Of these, liver interstitial dendritic cells (DCs) are heterogeneous, innate immune cells that appear to play pivotal roles in the instigation, integration and regulation of inflammatory responses after liver transplantation. Interstitial liver DCs (recruited in situ or derived from circulating precursors) have been implicated in regulation of both ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) and anti-donor immunity. Thus, livers transplanted from mice constitutively lacking DCs into syngeneic, wild-type recipients, display increased tissue injury, indicating a protective role of liver-resident donor DCs against transplant IRI. Also, donor DC depletion before transplant prevents mouse spontaneous liver allograft tolerance across major histocompatibility complex (MHC) barriers. On the other hand, mouse liver graft-infiltrating host DCs that acquire donor MHC antigen via “cross-dressing”, regulate anti-donor T cell reactivity in association with exhaustion of graft-infiltrating T cells and promote allograft tolerance. In an early phase clinical trial, infusion of donor-derived regulatory DCs (DCreg) before living donor liver transplantation can induce alterations in host T cell populations that may be conducive to attenuation of anti-donor immune reactivity. We discuss the role of DCs in regulation of warm and liver transplant IRI and the induction of liver allograft tolerance. We also address design of cell therapies using DCreg to reduce the immunosuppressive drug burden and promote clinical liver allograft tolerance.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 38-39
Author(s):  
Mobeen Zaka Haider ◽  
Zarlakhta Zamani ◽  
Muhammad Taqi ◽  
Hasan Mahmood Mirza ◽  
Yousra Khalid ◽  
...  

Background: Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), a group of lymphoid disorders ranging from indolent polyclonal proliferation to aggressive lymphomas is a known complication following solid organ transplantation. The aim is to study the characteristics, predictive factors, management, and outcomes of PTLD among pediatric groups after liver transplantation in particular. Methods: Following the PRISMA guideline, we performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov from the past ten years on May 04, 2020. We used the MeSH terms of organ transplantation and lymphoproliferative disorders. Initial search revealed 1741 articles. We excluded all case reports, case series, pre-clinical trials, review articles, and meta-analysis. We found five retrospectives observational, one observational cohort study, and one multicenter cohort in the pediatric population. We extracted the data for baseline characteristics, the reason for transplantation, recipient & donor EBV status, immunosuppression used, type & stage of PTLD, organ system involved, duration between transplant and PTLD diagnosis, treatment, response to therapy, adverse effects of therapy and mortality. Results: We included seven retrospective observational studies with a total (n) number of 3116 post-liver transplant pediatric patients, out of which 135 (4.33%) patients who developed PTLD as a complication of transplantation were studied. The male to female ratio was 41: 55 with the gender of 6 patients unknown. In five studies, with 118 PTLD patients, 34 recipients and 24 donors were positive for EBV at the time of liver transplantation. In addition to EBV, CMV status of patients in 5 studies showed 11/25 (44%) PTLD patients positive for CMV at the time of transplant. Post-transplant immunosuppression was achieved among these seven cohorts with cyclosporine, tacrolimus, OKT3, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and basiliximab. The diagnosis was made via biopsy, showing all histopathological types including early lesions 14/46 (30.4%), polymorphic 13/46 (28.3%), monomorphic 18/46 (39.1%), and classic Hodgkin's lymphoma PTLD 1/46 (2.1%). Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was the most common subtype in 6/18 (33.3%) of samples with monomorphic PTLD. Hsu, et al. in their study showed a five-year survival rate of 33.3% for St. Jude's classification stage IV lymphoma compared to 88.9% for stage I-III. The median age for 36 patients from three studies at the diagnosis of PTLD was 39.6 months (range 24-48 months). The median duration from transplantation to the diagnosis of PTLD was 13.48 months (range 8-24 months) in 54 patients from four studies. PTLD treatment was achieved with a combination of reduction or withdrawal of the immunosuppressive drugs with antiviral prophylaxis, chemotherapy, irradiation & the use of monoclonal antibodies in a total of 57 PTLD patients for which post-transplant immunosuppression data was available. Study by Hsu, et al. reported that 5/16 (31.3%) patients had acute graft rejection and 2 had a chronic rejection in a group of 16 PTLD patients undergoing treatment for PTLD with a reduction in immunosuppressive therapy. The overall mortality in patients who developed PTLD was 15/54 (27.8%) in four of the studies. Conclusions: Pre-transplant EBV-naive status in patients was associated with a higher incidence of PTLD. Advanced stage (Stage IV) lymphoma was associated with poor survival outcomes. Monomorphic histopathology may be most commonly associated with PTLD post-liver transplant. The main approach for the treatment of PTLD is the reduction or complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive drugs, administration of antiviral drugs (ganciclovir/valganciclovir),and lymphoma treatment with chemotherapy or irradiation, and monoclonal antibody therapy such as rituximab. Management of PTLD with reduction or withdrawal of post-transplant immunosuppressive drugs in one cohort was associated with an increased risk of graft rejection. Thus immunosuppressive therapy maintaining a fine balance between the risk of graft rejection and risk of developing PTLD may be associated with better patient outcomes post-liver transplant. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document