Inter-rater reliability, standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 and four performance tests in institutionalized ambulatory older adults

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 366-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anabela G. Silva ◽  
Margarida Cerqueira ◽  
Ana Raquel Santos ◽  
Catarina Ferreira ◽  
Joaquim Alvarelhão ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Standard Error ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Performance Tests ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Whodas 2.0 ◽  
Standard Error Of Measurement ◽  
Error Of Measurement

Reliability, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change of the star excursion balance test in children with cerebral palsy

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 909-912
Author(s):  
Do-Hyun Kim ◽  
Duk-Hyun An ◽  
Won-Gyu Yoo
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Standard Error ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Balance Test ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Children With Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Star Excursion Balance Test ◽  
Standard Error Of Measurement ◽  
Error Of Measurement

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to estimate the reliability, standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimum detectable change (MDC) of the star excursion balance test (SEBT) in children with cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: Eight children with CP (five boys and three girls, sixteen legs) participated in this study. Each child carried out the SEBT and was assessed by two examiners. To determine intra-rater reliability, the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) model (3, 3) was calculated. To determine the inter-rater reliability, the ICC model (2, 3) was computed. RESULTS: In terms of the intra-rater reliability of the SEBT, the ICC varied from 0.98 to 0.99 and the total ICC score was 0.99 (p< 0.001). For the inter-rater reliability, the ICC varied from 0.98 to 1.00 and the total ICC score was 0.99 (p< 0.001). The SEBT had an SEM of 2.63 and an MDC of 7.31. CONCLUSION: The SEBT is not only reliable with a small SEM, but is also a simple and cheap assessment of dynamic balance in children with CP.

scholarly journals Reliability of a Smartphone Goniometric Application in the Measurement of Hip Range of Motion Among Experienced and Novice Clinicians

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Enda Whyte ◽  
Tiarnán O. Doinn ◽  
Miriam Downey ◽  
Siobhán O’Connor
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Standard Error ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Hip Range Of Motion ◽  
Goniometric Measurements ◽  
Standard Error Of Measurement ◽  
Error Of Measurement

Context: Deficits in the hip range of motion are associated with hip and groin injuries. Accurate and reliable goniometric measurements are important in identifying those at risk of injury and determining the efficacy of treatment interventions. Smartphone goniometric applications are regularly used to assess joint ranges of motion; however, there is limited knowledge on the reliability of this method in relation to the hip, particularly between clinicians with different levels of experience. Objective: To determine the intratester and intertester reliability of a smartphone clinometer application for the assessment of hip goniometric measurements in healthy volunteers by an experienced and novice clinician. Design: Reliability study. Setting: University Athletic Therapy facility. Participants: Physically active, university students. Main Outcome Measures: The study determined the intra- and intertester (experienced vs novice clinician) reliability of goniometric measurements of the hip joint (modified Thomas test and seated hip internal and external rotation) using a smartphone goniometric application. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change at a 95% confidence interval were used to assess reliability. Results: Goniometric measurements demonstrated good to excellent relative intratester reliability for the modified Thomas test (ICC = .94), external rotation (ICC = .93–.95), and internal rotation (ICC = .80–.81). Intertester reliability for expert and novice clinicians was also excellent for the modified Thomas test (ICC = .98), external rotation (ICC = .95), and internal rotation (ICC = .92). Intratester and intertester standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change at 95% confidence interval values were similar for both testers and ranged from 1.9° to 3.6° and 5° to 10.1° and from 1.1° to 2.3° and 2.9° to 6.5°, respectively. Conclusion: Smartphone-based goniometric measurements of hip range of motion have high intratester and intertester reliability for novice and expert clinicians. It may be a useful, simple, and inexpensive resource for clinicians.

scholarly journals Standard Error of the Mean and Minimal Detectable Change of Gait Speed in Older Adults Using Japanese Long-Term Care Insurance System

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 233372142110489
Author(s):  
Yui Takada ◽  
Shigeharu Tanaka
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Standard Error ◽  
Gait Speed ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Detectable Change ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Long Term Care Insurance ◽  
The Mean

Evaluation of motor function, such as gait ability, can accurately predict the subsequent occurrence of disability in older adults. There are no reports of standard error of the mean (SEM) or minimal detectable change (MDC) with respect to gait in Japanese long-term care insurance-certified individuals. The purpose of this study was to investigate the values of preferred gait, fast gait, and the timed up and go (TUG) test. This study included 46 participants using the Japanese long-term care insurance system. (age 86.5 ± 6.6 years, 12 men, 34 women). The duration of three gait were measured twice using a stopwatch. The SEM was 0.07 for preferred gait, 0.09 for fast gait and 2.59 for TUG. The MDC was 0.19 for preferred gait, 0.26 for fast gait, and 7.17 for TUG. The SEM and MDC values of preferred gait, fast gait, and TUG in this study corroborated with those of previous studies, whereas others were different. Considering that gait speed differs with the country, it may be difficult to compare it among different population groups. We obtained the results of gait speed of Japanese long-term care insurance-certified individuals, which is a new finding

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document