A critical review of the biopsychosocial model of low back pain care: time for a new approach?

Author(s):  
Karime Mescouto ◽  
Rebecca E. Olson ◽  
Paul W. Hodges ◽  
Jenny Setchell
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
G. David Baxter ◽  
Cathy Chapple ◽  
Richard Ellis ◽  
Julia Hill ◽  
Lizhou Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Low back pain (LBP) is the leading contributor to years lived with disability, and imposes an enormous burden on individuals and on health-care systems. General practitioners and physiotherapists are generally the front-line health professionals dealing with patients with LBP, and have a key role in minimising its effect. Here we review six key issues associated with LBP including its effects, diagnosis and management in primary care, and highlight the importance of the biopsychosocial model and matched care for patients with LBP.


2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuela L. Ferreira ◽  
Robert D. Herbert ◽  
Paulo H. Ferreira ◽  
Jane Latimer ◽  
Raymond W. Ostelo ◽  
...  

The Lancet ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 330 (8551) ◽  
pp. 143-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
MilneJ. Ongley ◽  
ThomasA. Dorman ◽  
RobertG. Klein ◽  
BjornC. Eek ◽  
LawrenceJ Hubert

1991 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 1233-1245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Coste ◽  
Alfred Spira ◽  
Pierre Ducimetiere ◽  
Jean-Baptiste Paolaggi

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 388-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laran Chetty

Low back pain (LBP) remains one of the most common and challenging musculoskeletal conditions encountered by health care professionals and is a leading cause of absenteeism. Clinical guidelines are often considered best evidence in health care. The aim of this critical review was to assess the quality and recommendations of LBP guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. Electronic databases were used to identify LBP guidelines published between 2000 and 2015. Nine guidelines were selected for review from a total of 17. Only five guidelines effectively addressed the AGREE scoring. On the basis of the appraisal and domain scores, only four guidelines were strongly recommended. Improved translation of research evidence from guidelines to clinical practice is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document