Sustainability Appraisals of Regional Planning Guidance and Regional Economic Strategies in England: An Assessment

2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 735-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P. Smith ◽  
William R. Sheate
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Osama Rasmy ◽  
Tarek Abdel Latif Abu Atta ◽  
Asmaa Abdelaty Mohamed Ibrahim

PurposeThis study explores the best strategies for regional economic development to attract highly skilled populations, regardless of whether the region is a multisector or unisector economic hub. It also determines the development variables affecting the success of integrated regional economic hubs to achieve spatial equality, enhance economic productivity and attain environmental sustainability.Design/methodology/approachIn addition to a qualitative analysis, this study employed quantitative techniques using SPSS software. This allowed amplification of the most significant explanatory variables affecting the weaknesses and strengths of economic hubs.FindingsThe results highlight approaches that can be used to achieve socio-economic sustainability in regional hubs. These include multisectors or main centralised hubs (smart economic regional capital), which provide new services to regions and act as a unidevelopment sector or as a regional, economic capital.Research limitations/implicationsThe study analyses the effect of economic strategies and integration of natural resources and the required core services in regional economic development.Practical implicationsCase studies of successful economic hubs are discussed. The most important services proposed in such hubs promote human development and increase the standard of living.Social implicationsIntegration between the hubs in a region is fundamental to attracting direct investments that can benefit the local population.Originality/valueThe results could help governments, economists and planners implement multisector developmental hubs to achieve sustainable development.


1979 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 825-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
J B Parr

This paper explores some of the possible links that exist between regional economic change and regional spatial structure. The nature and significance of these links are discussed and three familiar examples from regional planning are used to illustrate the argument. These examples involve the regional reorganisation of service provision, the emergence of a depressed-area problem, and the trend toward metropolitan decentralisation (regional deconcentration). In each case the public-policy implications are briefly outlined. Consideration is then given to frameworks which can deal with the interrelatedness of regional economic change and regional spatial structure. Two broad frameworks are discussed. One involves an integration of regional economic analysis and location theory, and the other is concerned with approaches in which the two elements of economic change and spatial structure are interwoven.


Slavic Review ◽  
1965 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 466-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Lonsdale

In a society with virtually all phases of the economy subject to planning an interest in regional economic planning almost inevitably arises. Such an interest has been evident in the USSR since the early 1920s, although not always to the same degree. Out of this interest evolved the notion of the economic complex, broadly conceived as a regional grouping of integrated economic activities. Inasmuch as these complexes were frequently thought of as geographic entities, the expression “territorial-production complex” (territorial'no-proizvodstvennyi kompleks), as well as some essentially synonymous terms, came into use. Interpretations vary somewhat, but, to judge from the frequency of reference to the concept in the professional journals of the geographers, economists, and planners, the idea seems to be a basic one among those concerned with regional planning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document