scholarly journals Incidental learning of list membership is affected by serial position in the list

Memory ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 669-676
Author(s):  
Qiang Jiang ◽  
Nelson Cowan
1965 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 263-268
Author(s):  
Marilyn E. Miller ◽  
Alice A. Burroughs

224 Ss were instructed to learn a series of 7 geometric forms, each enclosing 1 of 7 different nonsense syllables. Half the Ss were instructed to learn the syllables for recognition (Intentional) and half were not (Incidental). A given syllable either appeared in the same form on all trials (Constant) or in a different form on each trial (Varied). Stimuli were presented for either 2 or 8 sec. for either 1, 3, 5, or 7 trials. These data were compared with data previously obtained from Ss who learned the series of syllables and were tested for form recognition. Serial anticipation learning was slower for forms than for syllables. Varying the position of forms facilitated their recognition, but varied position had no effect upon syllable recognition. Serial position error curves were inspected.


GeroPsych ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 161-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke A. Hofrichter ◽  
Sandra Dick ◽  
Thomas G. Riemer ◽  
Carsten Schleussner ◽  
Monique Goerke ◽  
...  

Hippocampal dysfunction and deficits in episodic memory have been reported for both Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). Primacy performance has been associated with hippocampus-dependent episodic memory, while recency may reflect working memory performance. In this study, serial position profiles were examined in a total of 73 patients with MDD, AD, both AD and MDD, and healthy controls (HC) by means of CERAD-NP word list memory. Primacy performance was most impaired in AD with comorbid MDD, followed by AD, MDD, and HC. Recency performance, on the other hand, was comparable across groups. These findings indicate that primacy in AD is impaired in the presence of comorbid MDD, suggesting additive performance decrements in this specific episodic memory function.


Author(s):  
Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen ◽  
Remy M. J. P. Rikers ◽  
Henk G. Schmidt

Abstract. The spacing effect refers to the finding that memory for repeated items improves when the interrepetition interval increases. To explain the spacing effect in free-recall tasks, a two-factor model has been put forward that combines mechanisms of contextual variability and study-phase retrieval (e.g., Raaijmakers, 2003 ; Verkoeijen, Rikers, & Schmidt, 2004 ). An important, yet untested, implication of this model is that free recall of repetitions should follow an inverted u-shaped relationship with interrepetition spacing. To demonstrate the suggested relationship an experiment was conducted. Participants studied a word list, consisting of items repeated at different interrepetition intervals, either under incidental or under intentional learning instructions. Subsequently, participants received a free-recall test. The results revealed an inverted u-shaped relationship between free recall and interrepetition spacing in both the incidental-learning condition and the intentional-learning condition. Moreover, for intentionally learned repetitions, the maximum free-recall performance was located at a longer interrepetition interval than for incidentally learned repetitions. These findings are interpreted in terms of the two-factor model of spacing effects in free-recall tasks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document