Comparison of upscaling cropland and non-cropland map using uncertainty weighted majority rule-based and the majority rule-based aggregation methods

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-163
Author(s):  
Peijun Sun ◽  
Yaozhong Pan ◽  
Jinshui Zhang
2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 385-386
Author(s):  
Arpan Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Ravi R. Mazumdar ◽  
Rahul Roy

Author(s):  
Karim Benouaret ◽  
Dimitris Sacharidis ◽  
Djamal Benslimane ◽  
Allel Hadjali

Author(s):  
Kosuke Fujita ◽  
◽  
Hideaki Touyama

In this study, a new method to realize majority rule is presented by using noninvasive brain activities. With the majority rule based on an electroencephalogram (EEG), a technique to determine the attention of multiple users is proposed. In general, a single-shot EEG ensures short-time response, but it is inevitably deteriorated by artifacts. To enhance the accuracy of the majority rule, the collaborative signals of P300 evoked potentials are focused. The collaborative P300 signal is prepared by averaging individual single-shot P300 signals among subjects. In experiments, the EEG signals of twelve volunteers were collected by using auditory stimuli. The subjects paid attention to target stimuli and no attention to standard stimuli. The collaborative P300 signal was used to evaluate the performance of the majority rule. The proposed algorithm enables us to estimate the degree of attention of the group. The classification is based on supervised machine learning, and the accuracy approximately 80%. The applications of this novel technique in multimedia content evaluations as well as neuromarketing and computer-supported co-operative work are discussed.


Author(s):  
Cuiping Cheng ◽  
Weiping Ding ◽  
Fuyuan Xiao ◽  
Witold Pedrycz
Keyword(s):  

Public Choice ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 53-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyal Baharad ◽  
Ruth Ben-Yashar

Author(s):  
Peter Emerson

By what principle does one majority have the right to rule, and another not? Secondly, while elections are generally transparent, why should forming a government be secretive? Is it because people believe, not only in majority rule, which may be fine, but also in (simple or weighted) majority voting, which is not so good? There are, after all, other more accurate voting systems by which can be identified the will of the majority; some of these latter methodologies are non-majoritarian. Now, if decision-making were to be based on a non-majoritarian voting procedure, the right to majority rule might be brought into question; indeed, majoritarianism might become obsolescent. Other forms of governance should therefore also be examined. Accordingly, this paper considers first, some of the deficiencies of a majoritarian polity; next, a more inclusive form of decision-making; then, majoritarian and non-majoritarian types of governance; and lastly, a voting system by which a parliament may elect a national government.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document