Equine superficial digital flexor tendon force and axial speed of sound: a calibration method under clinical conditions

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 12-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Vergari ◽  
P. Pourcelot ◽  
B. Ravary-Plumiöen ◽  
M. Camus ◽  
L. Holden-Douilly ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 355-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Vergari ◽  
D. Pradon ◽  
B. Ravary-Plumiöen ◽  
P. Pourcelot ◽  
N. Crevier-Denoix

1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 957-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.L. Lieber ◽  
D. Amiel ◽  
K.R. Kaufman ◽  
J. Whitney ◽  
R.H. Gelberman

1992 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANN E. KRAUS-HANSEN ◽  
G. E. FACKELMAN ◽  
C. BECKER ◽  
R. M. WILLIAMS ◽  
F. S. PIPERS

2017 ◽  
Vol 181 (24) ◽  
pp. 655-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Alzola Domingo ◽  
Chris M Riggs ◽  
David S Gardner ◽  
Sarah L Freeman

Superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT) tendinopathy is an important musculoskeletal problem in horses. The study objective was to validate an ultrasonographic scoring system for SDFT injuries. Ultrasonographic images from 14 Thoroughbred racehorses with SDFT lesions (seven core; seven diffuse) and two controls were blindly assessed by five clinicians on two occasions. Ultrasonographic parameters evaluated were: type and extent of the injury, location, echogenicity, cross-sectional area and longitudinal fibre pattern of the maximal injury zone (MIZ). Inter-rater variability and intra-rater reliability were assessed using Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (KC) and Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LC), respectively. Type of injury (core vs. diffuse) had perfect inter/intra-rater agreement. Cases with core lesions had very strong inter-rater agreement (KC ≥0.74, P<0.001) and intra-rater reliability (LC ≥0.73) for all parameters apart from echogenicity. Cases with diffuse lesions had strong inter-rater agreement (KC ≥0.62) for all parameters, but weak agreement for echogenicity (KC=0.22); intra-rater reliability was excellent for MIZ location and fibre pattern (LC ≥0.82), and moderate (LC ≥0.58) for cross-sectional area and number of zones affected. This scoring system was reliable and repeatable for all parameters, except for echogenicity. A validated scoring system will facilitate reliable recording of SDFT injuries and inter-study meta-analyses.


2007 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 540-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. T. Butcher ◽  
J. W. Hermanson ◽  
N. G. Ducharme ◽  
L. M. Mitchell ◽  
L. V. Soderholm ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (9) ◽  
pp. 1435-1444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart A. Vallance ◽  
Martin A. Vidal ◽  
Mary Beth Whitcomb ◽  
Brian G. Murphy ◽  
Mathieu Spriet ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (133) ◽  
pp. 20170261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Shearer ◽  
Chavaunne T. Thorpe ◽  
Hazel R. C. Screen

A nonlinear elastic microstructural model is used to investigate the relationship between structure and function in energy-storing and positional tendons. The model is used to fit mechanical tension test data from the equine common digital extensor tendon (CDET) and superficial digital flexor tendon (SDFT), which are used as archetypes of positional and energy-storing tendons, respectively. The fibril crimp and fascicle helix angles of the two tendon types are used as fitting parameters in the mathematical model to predict their values. The outer fibril crimp angles were predicted to be 15.1° ± 2.3° in the CDET and 15.8° ± 4.1° in the SDFT, and the average crimp angles were predicted to be 10.0° ± 1.5° in the CDET and 10.5° ± 2.7° in the SDFT. The crimp angles were not found to be statistically significantly different between the two tendon types ( p = 0.572). By contrast, the fascicle helix angles were predicted to be 7.9° ± 9.3° in the CDET and 29.1° ± 10.3° in the SDFT and were found to be statistically highly significantly different between the two tendon types ( p < 0.001). This supports previous qualitative observations that helical substructures are more likely to be found in energy-storing tendons than in positional tendons and suggests that the relative compliance of energy-storing tendons may be directly caused by these helical substructures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document