ON THE RATE OF SPREAD FOR SOME REACTION-DIFFUSION MODELS OF FOREST FIRE PROPAGATION

2004 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 765-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaled Chetehouna ◽  
Mustapha Er-Riani ◽  
Olivier
2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Martin Ambroz ◽  
Karol Mikula ◽  
Marek Fraštia ◽  
Marián Marčiš

AbstractThis paper first gives a brief overview of the Lagrangian forest fire propagation model [Ambroz, M.—Balažovjech, M.—Medl’a, M.—Mikula, K.: Numerical modeling of wildland surface fire propagation by evolving surface curves, Adv. Comput. Math. 45 (2019), no. 2, 1067–1103], which we apply to grass-field areas. Then, we aim to estimate the optimal model parameters. To achieve this goal, we use data assimilation of the measured data. From the data, we are able to estimate the normal velocity of the fire front (rate of spread), dominant wind direction and selected model parameters. In the data assimilation process, we use the Hausdorff distance as well as the Mean Hausdorff distance as a criterion. Moreover, we predict the fire propagation in small time intervals.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 2249-2263 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Pagnini ◽  
A. Mentrelli

Abstract. Wildland fire propagation is studied in the literature by two alternative approaches, namely the reaction–diffusion equation and the level-set method. These two approaches are considered alternatives to each other because the solution of the reaction–diffusion equation is generally a continuous smooth function that has an exponential decay, and it is not zero in an infinite domain, while the level-set method, which is a front tracking technique, generates a sharp function that is not zero inside a compact domain. However, these two approaches can indeed be considered complementary and reconciled. Turbulent hot-air transport and fire spotting are phenomena with a random nature and they are extremely important in wildland fire propagation. Consequently, the fire front gets a random character, too; hence, a tracking method for random fronts is needed. In particular, the level-set contour is randomised here according to the probability density function of the interface particle displacement. Actually, when the level-set method is developed for tracking a front interface with a random motion, the resulting averaged process emerges to be governed by an evolution equation of the reaction–diffusion type. In this reconciled approach, the rate of spread of the fire keeps the same key and characterising role that is typical of the level-set approach. The resulting model emerges to be suitable for simulating effects due to turbulent convection, such as fire flank and backing fire, the faster fire spread being because of the actions by hot-air pre-heating and by ember landing, and also due to the fire overcoming a fire-break zone, which is a case not resolved by models based on the level-set method. Moreover, from the proposed formulation, a correction follows for the formula of the rate of spread which is due to the mean jump length of firebrands in the downwind direction for the leeward sector of the fireline contour. The presented study constitutes a proof of concept, and it needs to be subjected to a future validation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. e09
Author(s):  
Monica Denham ◽  
Karina Laneri ◽  
Viviana Zimmerman ◽  
Sigfrido Waidelich

We developed a Reaction Diffusion Convection (RDC) model for forest fire propagation coupled to a visualization platform with several functionalities requested by local firefighters. The dynamical model aims to understand the key mechanisms driving fire propagation in the Patagonian region. We'll show in this work the first tests considering combustion and diffusion in artificial landscapes. The simulator, developed in CUDA/OpenGL, integrates several layers including topography, weather, and fuel data. It allows to visualize the fire propagation and also to interact with the user in simulation time. The Fire Weather Index (FWI), extensively used in Argentina to support operative preventive measures for forest fires management, was also coupled to our visualization platform. This additional functionality allows the user to visualize on the landscape the fire risks, that are closely related to FWI, for Northwest Patagonian forests in Argentina.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 6521-6557
Author(s):  
G. Pagnini ◽  
A. Mentrelli

Abstract. Wildland fire propagation is studied in literature by two alternative approaches, namely the reaction-diffusion equation and the level-set method. These two approaches are considered alternative each other because the solution of the reaction-diffusion equation is generally a continuous smooth function that has an exponential decay and an infinite support, while the level-set method, which is a front tracking technique, generates a sharp function with a finite support. However, these two approaches can indeed be considered complementary and reconciled. Turbulent hot-air transport and fire spotting are phenomena with a random character that are extremely important in wildland fire propagation. As a consequence the fire front gets a random character, too. Hence a tracking method for random fronts is needed. In particular, the level-set contourn is here randomized accordingly to the probability density function of the interface particle displacement. Actually, when the level-set method is developed for tracking a front interface with a random motion, the resulting averaged process emerges to be governed by an evolution equation of the reaction-diffusion type. In this reconciled approach, the rate of spread of the fire keeps the same key and characterizing role proper to the level-set approach. The resulting model emerges to be suitable to simulate effects due to turbulent convection as fire flank and backing fire, the faster fire spread because of the actions by hot air pre-heating and by ember landing, and also the fire overcoming a firebreak zone that is a case not resolved by models based on the level-set method. Moreover, from the proposed formulation it follows a correction for the rate of spread formula due to the mean jump-length of firebrands in the downwind direction for the leeward sector of the fireline contour.


2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldo Ledesma-Durán ◽  
Lorenzo-Héctor Juárez-Valencia ◽  
Juan-Bibiano Morales-Malacara ◽  
Iván Santamaría-Holek

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 95-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Viegas
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document