scholarly journals Final 5-year findings from the phase 3 HELIOS study of ibrutinib plus bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (13) ◽  
pp. 3188-3197
Author(s):  
Graeme A.M. Fraser ◽  
Asher Chanan-Khan ◽  
Fatih Demirkan ◽  
Rodrigo Santucci Silva ◽  
Sebastian Grosicki ◽  
...  
Haematologica ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Moreno ◽  
Richard Greil ◽  
Fatih Demirkan ◽  
Alessandra Tedeschi ◽  
Bertrand Anz ◽  
...  

iLLUMINATE is a randomized, open-label phase 3 study of ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab (n=113) versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (n=116) as first-line therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma. Eligible patients were aged ≥65 years, or


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5480-5480
Author(s):  
Anita Sultan ◽  
Bradley J. Grant ◽  
Donald P. Quick ◽  
Chandler Graf ◽  
Sriman Swarup ◽  
...  

Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/ small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/ SLL) is the most common adult lymphoproliferative disorder in western countries and the B-cell receptor signaling pathway has been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of CLL/ SLL. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) is a kinase protein in downstream signaling for multiple pathways in B cells, promoting B-cell survival, proliferation and metabolism. Two prominent PI3K inhibitors, idelalisib (PI3Kδ-selective inhibitor) and duvelisib (PI3Kδ/γ-combinatorial inhibitor), are currently being studied in the treatment of relapsed and refractory CLL/ SLL. The purpose of our study is to explore and consolidate the efficacy of PI3K inhibitors in patients with relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL. Methods: We systematically conducted a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE databases and meeting abstracts from inception through June 2019. Phase 3 RCTs utilizing PI3K inhibitors in patients with relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL were incorporated in the analysis. A generic inverse variance method was used to calculate the estimated pooled hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q -statistic. Random effects model was applied. Results: Four phase 3 RCTs with a total of 1,216 patients with relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL were eligible for analysis. Studies compared ofatumumab vs idelalisib+ofatumumab, rituximab vs idelalisib+rituximab, bendamustine+ rituximab vs idelalisib+bendamustine+rituximab and ofatumumab vs duvelisib. The randomization ratio was 2:1 in the study by Jones et al. and 1:1 in other studies. The I2 statistic for heterogeneity was 82%, suggesting moderate heterogeneity among RCTs. The overall pooled HR for PFS was statistically significant at 0.30 (95% CI: 0.20- 0.47; P < 0.0001). The PFS benefit was observed across all ages and regardless of del 17p or TP53 status; age <65 (HR, 0.35; 95% CI: 0.27- 0.46; P < 0.0001), age ≥65 (HR, 0.32; 95% CI: 0.19- 0.54; P < 0.0001), either del 17p or TP53 cohort (HR, 0.33; 95% CI: 0.21- 0.52; P < 0.0001), and neither del 17p nor TP53 cohort (HR, 0.32; 95% CI: 0.19- 0.54; P < 0.0001). In the subset of patients with CLL treated with idelalisib, the pooled HR for PFS was statistically significant at 0.26 (95% CI: 0.18-0.37; P < 0.0001) and the PFS benefit was observed across all ages, and regardless of del17p or TP53 status and IGHV mutation status; age <65 (HR, 0.32; 95% CI: 0.24- 0.43; P < 0.0001), age ≥65 (HR, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.14- 0.47; P < 0.0001), either del17p or TP53 cohort (HR, 0.29; 95% CI: 0.15- 0.57; P = 0.0003), neither del17p nor TP53 cohort (HR, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.20- 0.35; P < 0.0001), IGHV mutated cohort (HR, 0.29; 95% CI: 0.17- 0.51; P < 0.0001), and IGHV unmutated cohort (HR, 0.25; 95% CI: 0.15- 0.40; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our study showed that PI3K inhibitors, idelalisib (PI3Kδ-selective inhibitor) and duvelisib (PI3Kδ/γ-combinatorial inhibitor), significantly improved PFS in patients with relapsed and refractory CLL/ SLL regardless of age and poor prognostic features such as del17p or TP53 and IGHV unmutated status, compared to control arm. The efficacy of these drugs must be balanced against the possible side effects. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5489-5489
Author(s):  
Jonathan Kopel ◽  
Sriman Swarup ◽  
Anita Sultan ◽  
Lukman Tijani ◽  
Ei Moe Phyu ◽  
...  

Introduction: Idelalisib is a first-in-class potent, oral, selective small-molecule inhibitor of δ isoform of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3Kδ), which involves in the signaling of B-cell receptor pathways via activation of downstream serine threonine kinases AKT and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/ small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). Yet, there are considerable safety concerns. We undertook a systematic review and combined analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials to determine the risk of serious adverse events, infection and sepsis in patients with relapsed/ refractory CLL/SLL treated with idelalisib. Methods: We systematically conducted a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE databases and meeting abstracts from inception through June 2019. Phase 3 RCTs utilizing idelalisib in patients with relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL that mention serious adverse events, infection and sepsis as adverse effects were incorporated in the analysis. Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method was used to calculate the estimated pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q- statistic. Random effects model was applied. Results: Three phase 3 RCTs with a total of 892 patients with relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL were eligible for analysis. Studies compared ofatumumab vs idelalisib+ofatumumab, rituximab vs idelalisib+rituximab, bendamustine+ rituximab vs idelalisib+bendamustine+rituximab and ofatumumab vs duvelisib. The randomization ratio was 2:1 in Jones et al. study and 1:1 in other studies. The I2 statistic for heterogeneity was 83, suggesting moderate heterogeneity among RCTs. The incidence of serious adverse events was 341 (69.59%) in study group vs 177 (44.03%) in control group with RR of 1.50 (95% CI: 1.28-1.75; p < 0.0001). Pneumonitis was noted in 14 (2.86%) vs 1 (0.25%) in control group (RR, 5.42; 95% CI: 1.22-24.13; p = 0.03). The incidence of any-grade pneumonia was 78 (15.92%) in study group vs 45 (11.19%) in control group (RR, 1.38; 95% CI: 0.98 - 1.96; P = 0.07). High-grade pneumonia was reported in 59 (12.04%) in idelalisib arm versus 33 (8.21%) in control group with RR of 1.36 (95% CI: 0.82 - 2.27; P = 0.23). Pneumocystis jiroveci (PJP) pneumonia rate was 2.56% higher in study group compared to control arm (RR, 4.25; 95% CI: 1.10 - 16.34; P = 0.04). Febrile neutropenia was noted in 13.47% in study group versus 4.73% in control arm (RR, 2.39; 95% CI: 0.90-6.34; p = 0.08). Sepsis rate was 3.36% higher in idelalisib group compared to control arm and the pooled RR was statistically significant at 2.64 (95% CI 1.10-6.30; p = 0.03). Treatment-related deaths were 45 (6.92%) in idelalisib arm vs 21 (3.74%) in control arm according to analysis of 2 trials. The pooled RR was not statistically significant at 1.64 (95% CI: 0.99 -2.71; P = 0.06). Conclusion: Patients on idelalisib experienced higher risk of serious adverse events, pneumonitis, PJP pneumonia, and sepsis, with RR of 1.50 for serious adverse events, RR of 5.42 for pneumonitis, RR of 4.25 for PJP pneumonia and RR of 2.64 for sepsis respectively. Nevertheless, there was no significant increase in treatment-related deaths due to TRAE in the idelalisib group, compared to control arm. Preemptive measures with proper supportive care are required to reduce those toxicities which can ultimately improve patients' quality of life and may probably affect patients' compliance. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3732-3732
Author(s):  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
Caroline Dartigeas ◽  
Marta Coscia ◽  
Peter S. Ganly ◽  
Ghassan Al-Jazayrly ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Covalent Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitors (BTKi) have transformed the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), but these treatments are not curative and the majority of patients will require additional treatment. Covalent BTKi share pharmacologic liabilities (e.g. low oral bioavailability, short half-life) that collectively may lead to suboptimal BTK target coverage, for example in rapidly proliferating tumors with high BTK protein turnover such as accelerating CLL/SLL, ultimately manifesting as acquired resistance in some patients. To address these limitations, pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, non-covalent BTKi that inhibits both wild type (WT) and C481-mutated BTK with equal low nM potency was developed. In a phase 1/2 BRUIN study, pirtobrutinib achieved pharmacokinetic exposures that exceeded its BTK IC96 at trough, was well tolerated, and demonstrated promising efficacy in CLL/SLL patients regardless of prior therapy, number of prior lines of therapy, or BTK C481 mutation status (Mato et al. Lancet 2021;397, 10277:892-901). Study Design and Methods: BRUIN CLL-313 is a randomized, open-label, global phase 3 study comparing pirtobrutinib monotherapy versus bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in treatment naïve CLL/SLL patients with retained 17p. Approximately 250 patients will be randomized 1:1. Randomization will be stratified by IGHV mutation status (mutated vs unmutated), and Rai stage (low/intermediate vs high). Patients in the BR arm are eligible to crossover to pirtobrutinib monotherapy if they experience progressive disease per iwCLL 2018 and confirmed by an independent review committee (IRC). Eligible patients are adults with confirmed diagnosis of CLL/SLL and who require therapy per iwCLL 2018 criteria. Key exclusion criteria include CNS involvement by CLL/SLL, Richter transformation to DLBCL, prolymphocytic leukemia or Hodgkin lymphoma any time pre-enrollment, presence of 17p deletion, prior systemic therapy for CLL/SLL, and significant cardiovascular disease. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) per iwCLL assessed by an IRC. Secondary endpoints include investigator-assessed PFS, overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), safety and tolerability, and patient reported outcomes. The global study is currently enrolling patients. Disclosures Jurczak: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Celtrion, Celgene, Debbiopharm, Epizyme, Incyte, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Merck, Mei Pharma, Morphosys, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Sandoz, Roche,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dartigeas: Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress. Coscia: Gilead: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other; Janssen: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Wang: Eli Lilly and Company: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bao: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment; Genentech: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Leow: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shahda: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zinzani: Eusapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celtrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.


Leukemia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 969-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Fraser ◽  
P. Cramer ◽  
F. Demirkan ◽  
R. Santucci Silva ◽  
S. Grosicki ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5877-5877
Author(s):  
Bradley J. Grant ◽  
Anita Sultan ◽  
Nicholas D'Cunha ◽  
Chandler Graf ◽  
Sriman Swarup ◽  
...  

Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia is the most prevalent adult leukemia in western countries. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) is a kinase protein involved in downstream signaling for the B-cell receptor signaling pathway and has been shown to involve in the pathogenesis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/ SLL) by promoting B-cell survival, proliferation and metabolism. Two prominent PI3K inhibitors, idelalisib (PI3Kδ-selective inhibitor) and duvelisib (PI3Kδ/γ-combinatorial inhibitor), have recently shown to improve survival in patients with relapsed and refractory CLL/ SLL. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials to determine the risk of hematological toxicities associated with PI3K inhibitors. Methods: We systematically conducted a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE databases and meeting abstracts from inception through June 2019. Phase 3 RCTs utilizing PI3K inhibitors in patients with relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL that mention hematological toxicities as adverse effects were incorporated in the analysis. Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate the estimated pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q- statistic. Random effects model was applied. Results: Four phase 3 RCTs with a total of 1,216 patients with relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL were included. Studies compared ofatumumab vs idelalisib+ofatumumab, rituximab vs idelalisib+rituximab, bendamustine+ rituximab vs idelalisib+bendamustine+rituximab and ofatumumab vs duvelisib. The randomization ratio was 2:1 in Jones et al. study and 1:1 in other studies. The I2 statistic for heterogeneity was 49, suggesting some heterogeneity among RCTs. The RR of all-grade side effects were as follows: anemia, 1.39 (95% CI: 0.89 - 2.17; p = 0.15); neutropenia, 1.33 (95% CI: 1.06 - 1.67; p = 0.02); and thrombocytopenia, 1.23 (95% CI: 0.69 - 2.18; p = 0.48). The RR of high-grade adverse effects were as follows: anemia, 1.29 (95% CI: 0.62 - 2.67, p = 0.50); neutropenia, 1.51 (95% CI: 1.22 - 1.88; p = 0.0001); and thrombocytopenia, 1.21 (95% CI: 0.66 - 2.22; p = 0.53). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 76 (11.69%) in study group vs 22 (3.92%) in control group with RR of 2.62 (95% CI: 1.27 -5.41, P = 0.009). Conclusions: PI3K inhibitors, idelalisib (PI3Kδ-selective inhibitor) and duvelisib (PI3Kδ/γ-combinatorial inhibitor), increased the risk of all grades of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, with RR of 2.62 for febrile neutropenia, in patients with relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL. Vigilant monitoring is warranted, and proper supportive care and dose modifications should be followed. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 798-798
Author(s):  
Sriman Swarup ◽  
Donald P. Quick ◽  
Anita Sultan ◽  
Myint Aung Win ◽  
Ei Moe Phyu ◽  
...  

Introduction: Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) is a kinase protein involved in downstream signaling for multiple pathways in B cells and is important for B cell survival, proliferation and metabolism. Hence, PI3K inhibitors have become an attractive therapeutic option for treatment of B cell malignancies. Two prominent PI3K inhibitors, (PI3Kδ-selective inhibitor) and duvelisib (PI3Kδ/γ-combinatorial inhibitor), are currently being studied in relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and have shown to improve survival in recent trials with notable toxicities. We analyzed phase 3 trials to assess the incidence of serious adverse events, pneumonitis, infection and sepsis associated with PI3K inhibitors in this susceptible population. Methods: We systematically conducted a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE databases and meeting abstracts from inception through June 2019. Phase 3 RCTs utilizing PI3K inhibitors in patients with relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL that mention serious adverse events, pneumonitis, infection and sepsis as adverse effects were incorporated in the analysis. Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method was used to calculate the estimated pooled risk ratio (RR), and risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q- statistic. Random effects model was applied. Results: Four phase 3 RCTs with a total of 1,216 patients with relapsed and refractory CLL/SLL were included in analysis. Studies compared ofatumumab vs idelalisib+ofatumumab, rituximab vs idelalisib+rituximab, bendamustine+ rituximab vs idelalisib+bendamustine+rituximab and ofatumumab vs duvelisib. The randomization ratio was 2:1 in Jones et al. study and 1:1 in other studies. The I2 statistic for heterogeneity was 49, suggesting some heterogeneity among RCTs. The incidence of serious adverse events was 479 (73.69%) in study group vs 252 (44.92%) in control group (RR, 1.58; 95% CI: 1.37 - 1.83; P &lt; 0.0001 and RD, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.13 - 0.40; P = 0.0002). Pneumonitis was noted in 20 (3.07%) vs 1 (0.18%) in control group with RR of 6.53 (95% CI: 1.74 -24.53; P = 0.005) and RD of 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01 - 0.04; P = 0.0004). The incidence of any-grade pneumonia was 107 (16.46%) in study group vs 54 (9.63%) in control group (RR, 1.61; 95% CI: 1.00 - 2.58; P = 0.05). High-grade pneumonia was reported in 81 (12.46%) in idelalisib arm versus 35 (6.24%) in control group with RR of 1.84 (95% CI: 0.82 - 4.13; P = 0.14). Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) rate was 2.24% higher in study group compared to control arm (RR, 3.87; 95% CI: 1.22 - 12.29; P = 0.02). Any-grade upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) was 14% in study group versus 7.84% in control arm (RR, 1.65; 95% CI: 1.17 - 2.34; P = 0.005). Sepsis rate was 2.88% higher in idelalisib group compared to control arm and the pooled RR was statistically significant at 2.68 (95% CI: 1.19 - 6.04, P = 0.02). Treatment-related deaths were 64 (11.85%) in study arm vs 28 (6.17%) in control arm according to analysis of 3 trials. The pooled RR was also statistically significant at 1.87 (95% CI: 1.21 -2.88; P = 0.005). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis showed that the incidence of serious adverse events, pneumonitis, PJP pneumonia, any-grade URTI and sepsis was significantly higher in PI3K inhibitors group with RR of 1.58 for serious adverse events, RR of 6.53 for pneumonitis, RR of 3.87 for PJP pneumonia and RR of 2.68 for sepsis respectively. Moreover, patients on PI3K inhibitors experienced 5.68% higher incidence of treatment-related deaths with RR of 1.87, compared to control arm. Since treatment-related serious toxicities and deaths are higher amongst patients treated with these agents, extra caution should be observed and recommended with their use. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document