Comparing the effectiveness of reading modifications on comprehension accuracy and reading comprehension rate

Author(s):  
Emily C. Bouck ◽  
Adrea Truckenmiller ◽  
Erin Bone ◽  
Sara Flanagan
2021 ◽  
pp. 026553222199148
Author(s):  
Tineke Brunfaut ◽  
Judit Kormos ◽  
Marije Michel ◽  
Michael Ratajczak

Extensive research has demonstrated the impact of working memory (WM) on first language (L1) reading comprehension across age groups (Peng et al., 2018), and on foreign language (FL) reading comprehension of adults and older adolescents (Linck et al., 2014). Comparatively little is known about the effect of WM on young FL readers’ comprehension, and even less within testing contexts. Young FL readers are still developing their L1 reading skills and general cognitive skills (e.g., attentional regulation abilities). Completing FL reading tests might be particularly taxing on their WM, and differences in WM capacity – as well as other learner and task characteristics – might create construct-irrelevant variance in test performance. In this study we investigate the effects of WM, grade level, and reading task on young learners’ FL reading test performances. Ninety-four young English language learners (Grades 6–7) in Hungary completed the TOEFL® Junior™ Comprehensive’s reading test and a WM test battery. Our mixed-effects model predicted significantly higher comprehension accuracy among learners with higher WM capacity, and among learners in Grade 7 compared to learners in Grade 6. Reading task differences were not associated with significant comprehension accuracy differences. We discuss the implications of our findings for testing young learners’ FL reading comprehension.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 220-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ara J. Schmitt ◽  
Elizabeth McCallum ◽  
Renee O. Hawkins ◽  
Emily Stephenson ◽  
Kenneth Vicencio

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1S) ◽  
pp. 423-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet Webster ◽  
Julie Morris ◽  
David Howard ◽  
Maria Garraffa

Purpose The current study investigated the effect of text variables including length, readability, propositional content, and type of information on the reading comprehension of people with aphasia. Method The performance of 75 people with aphasia was compared with 87 healthy, age-matched control participants. Reading comprehension was considered in terms of both accuracy in responding to questions tapping comprehension and reading time. Participants with aphasia (PWA) were divided into 2 groups (no reading impairment [PWA:NRI] and reading impairment [PWA:RI]) depending on whether their performance fell within the 5th percentile of control participants. Results As groups, both PWA:NRI and PWA:RI differed significantly from control participants in terms of reading time and comprehension accuracy. PWA:NRI and PWA:RI differed from each other in terms of accuracy but not reading time. There was no significant effect of readability or propositional density on comprehension accuracy or reading time for any of the groups. There was a significant effect of length on reading time but not on comprehension accuracy. All groups found main ideas easier than details, stated information easier than inferred, and had particular difficulty with questions that required integration of information across paragraphs (gist). Conclusions Both accuracy of comprehension and reading speed need to be considered when characterizing reading difficulties in people with aphasia.


2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Williams ◽  
Christopher H. Skinner ◽  
Kathryn E. Jaspers

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 393-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Ciancio ◽  
Kelly Thompson ◽  
Megan Schall ◽  
Christopher Skinner ◽  
Barbara Foorman

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 1036-1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher H. Skinner ◽  
Jacqueline L. Williams ◽  
Jennifer Ann Morrow ◽  
Andre D. Hale ◽  
Christine E. Neddenriep ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea D. Hale ◽  
Jaime B. Henning ◽  
Renee O. Hawkins ◽  
Wesley Sheeley ◽  
Larissa Shoemaker ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine E. Neddenriep ◽  
Andrea D. Hale ◽  
Christopher H. Skinner ◽  
Renee O. Hawkins ◽  
Beth D. Winn

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 562-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawna Duff

Purpose Vocabulary intervention can improve comprehension of texts containing taught words, but it is unclear if all middle school readers get this benefit. This study tests 2 hypotheses about variables that predict response to vocabulary treatment on text comprehension: gains in vocabulary knowledge due to treatment and pretreatment reading comprehension scores. Method Students in Grade 6 ( N = 23) completed a 5-session intervention based on robust vocabulary instruction (RVI). Knowledge of the semantics of taught words was measured pre- and posttreatment. Participants then read 2 matched texts, 1 containing taught words (treated) and 1 not (untreated). Treated texts and taught word lists were counterbalanced across participants. The difference between text comprehension scores in treated and untreated conditions was taken as a measure of the effect of RVI on text comprehension. Results RVI resulted in significant gains in knowledge of taught words ( d RM = 2.26) and text comprehension ( d RM = 0.31). The extent of gains in vocabulary knowledge after vocabulary treatment did not predict the effect of RVI on comprehension of texts. However, untreated reading comprehension scores moderated the effect of the vocabulary treatment on text comprehension: Lower reading comprehension was associated with greater gains in text comprehension. Readers with comprehension scores below the mean experienced large gains in comprehension, but those with average/above average reading comprehension scores did not. Conclusion Vocabulary instruction had a larger effect on text comprehension for readers in Grade 6 who had lower untreated reading comprehension scores. In contrast, the amount that children learned about taught vocabulary did not predict the effect of vocabulary instruction on text comprehension. This has implications for the identification of 6th-grade students who would benefit from classroom instruction or clinical intervention targeting vocabulary knowledge.


2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 82-89
Author(s):  
Janet L. Proly ◽  
Jessica Rivers ◽  
Jamie Schwartz

Abstract Graphic organizers are a research based strategy used for facilitating the reading comprehension of expository text. This strategy will be defined and the evolution and supporting evidence for the use of graphic organizers will be discussed. Various types of graphic organizers and resources for SLPs and other educators will also be discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document