Contextualizing Information Literacy Enrichment Through a Common Reader in a First-Year Experience Seminar

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Fay Philips ◽  
Emerson Case
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 51-69
Author(s):  
Melissa Harden

Abstract Objective – The Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education has generated a significant amount of discussion among academic librarians; however, few have discussed the potential impact on learning when students interact directly with the Framework itself. At the University of Notre Dame, over 1,900 first-year students completed an information literacy assignment in their required first-year experience course. Students read a condensed version of the Framework, then wrote a response discussing how a frame of their choosing was reflected in an assigned reading. The goal of this exploratory study was to determine if the students demonstrated an understanding of the themes and concepts in the Framework based on this assignment. Methods – Topic modeling, a method for discovering topics contained in a corpus of text, was used to explore the themes that emerged in the students’ responses to this assignment and assess the degree to which they connect to frames in the Framework. The model receives no information about the Framework prior to the analysis; it only uses the students’ words to form topics. Results – The responses formed several topics that are recognizable as related to the frames from the Framework, suggesting that students were able to engage effectively and meaningfully with the language of the Framework. Because the topic model does not know anything about the Framework, the fact that the responses formed topics that are recognizable as frames suggests that students internalized the concepts in the Framework well enough to express them in their own writing. Conclusion – This research provides insight regarding the impact that the Framework may have on student understanding of information literacy concepts.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-176
Author(s):  
Alisa Howlett

A Review of: Kirker, M. J., & Stonebraker, I. (2019). Architects, renovators, builders and fragmenters: A model for first year students’ self-perceptions and perceptions of information literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.10.009 Abstract Objective – To explore students’ perceptions of their information literacy skills and how these change during the first-year experience. Design – A longitudinal qualitative study using cognitive dissonance theory. Setting – Two large public universities in the United States of America. Subjects – Students enrolled in research methods and information literacy-based courses in their first semester. Methods – Students were required to submit two written self-reflections as part of their course; the first was completed in the first two weeks of the semester and the second at the end of the semester. Informed consent was obtained for all reflections used for the study. The authors selected 12 students (6 from each institution) to participate in semi-structured interviews at the end of their first year. A total of 178 self-reflections were included in the analysis. Main Results – The study found that students’ understanding of research changed during the first-year experience, and that students had four main journeys related to their information literacy skills and perceptions. Instances of cognitive dissonance were observed. Students can consider themselves both good and bad researchers at the same time. The study also revealed the research process as an emotional labour, not just an intellectual one. Conclusion – The study concluded that a shared understanding of “research” between librarians and students is needed in order to teach information literacy effectively. It is also important to recognise that students transform their information literacy over time (not just from a single class or program) and that teaching needs to meet students where they are on their journey, depending on their “developmental paths.”


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charu Thakral ◽  
Philip L. Vasquez ◽  
Bette L. Bottoms ◽  
Alicia K. Matthews ◽  
Kimberly M. Hudson ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadime Yuksel ◽  
Safa Celik ◽  
Filiz Daskafa ◽  
Nilufer Keser ◽  
Elif Odabas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document