Knowledge of Colon Cancer Screening in a National Probability Sample in the United States

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (sup001) ◽  
pp. 19-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer S. Ford ◽  
Elliot J. Coups ◽  
Jennifer L. Hay
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 506-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haq Nawaz ◽  
Christina Via ◽  
Armin Shahrokni ◽  
Prakash Ramdass ◽  
Ali Raoof ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 2521-2528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Carlos ◽  
Charles E. McCulloch ◽  
Chi-yuan Hsu ◽  
Barbara Grimes ◽  
Meda E. Pavkov ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Ioannou ◽  
Kyle Sutherland ◽  
Daniel A. Sussman ◽  
Amar R. Deshpande

Abstract Background Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in the United States is suboptimal, particularly in medically underserved populations due to significant barriers to care. Unique accessible, low-cost, and non-invasive screening tests for this population could greatly benefit current rates. In this article, we assess patient preference and the impact of offering a blood-based test on screening rates in a cost-free health fair setting from April 2017 to April 2019. Methods Participants who met colorectal cancer screening eligibility criteria set forth by the United States Preventive Services Task Force were recommended to attend the colon cancer screening station. Those participants who elected to attend were offered various, accepted screening methods, and if they declined, were offered alternative blood-based testing. Screening rates, test outcomes, and the rate of follow up completion of colonoscopy were measured and compared with historic screening outcomes. Results Of 1401 participants who were recommended to attend, 640 (45.7%) participants were evaluated at the colon cancer screening station, of whom 460 were eligible for testing. Amongst these, none selected colonoscopy, 30 (6.5%) selected fecal immunochemical testing, and 430 (93.5%) selected blood-based testing. Only 2 participants returned the fecal immunochemical tests. In the blood test cohort, 88 were positive and 20 received a follow up colonoscopy. Conclusions Based on this assessment, blood-based testing is an effective method to increase screening rates in medically underserved populations, though efforts to further improve access to follow up colonoscopy are necessary.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 215013272093132
Author(s):  
Jose Raul Valery ◽  
Andres Applewhite ◽  
Alyssa Manaois ◽  
John Dimuna ◽  
Taimur Sher ◽  
...  

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, despite being largely preventable and treatable. Improving overall screening rates among both men and women is considered an important and effective strategy toward reducing morbidity and mortality from CRC. In order to optimize screening strategies, factors associated with decreased compliance need to be understood. This study aimed to compare initial CRC screening rates between males and females in a population of patients who presented for an annual physical examination. Methods: A retrospective chart review study of 380 patients designed to compare rates of initial CRC screening between males and females was conducted. Patients who were seen at our institution for an annual physical examination and were between 51 and 60 years of age were included. Results: There was no evidence of a difference in the rate of initial colon cancer screening between females (83.0%) and males (80.9%) in either unadjusted analysis (odds ratio = 1.16, P = .59) or in multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounding variables (odds ratio = 1.16, P = .61). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the rate of initial CRC screening between males and females who presented for an annual physical examination. This suggests that designing interventions to improve screening specific to gender may not be needed in a population of patients who attend routine preventive health examinations. Further study is needed in the general population to examine for gender-based differences in initial CRC screening among patients who do not regularly follow up for preventive examinations.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 291-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Reece ◽  
Debby Herbenick ◽  
Vanessa Schick ◽  
Stephanie A. Sanders ◽  
Brian Dodge ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document