Empirical Evidence on Mortgage Choice as a Screening Mechanism for Default Risk

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Harrison ◽  
Thomas Noordewier
1988 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-373
Author(s):  
David Bowles ◽  
Holley Ulbrich ◽  
Myles Wallace

Conventional macroeconomic models suggest that expansionary fiscal policy causes higher interest rates, resulting in crowding out of private investment. In this article, we argue that such models ignore the default risk differential between the interest rates on government bonds and corporate bonds. If expansionary fiscal policy causes an expansion in real GNP, default risk falls on corporate bonds. Our model suggests that if the default risk premium falls, (1) corporate interest rates may fall relative to rates on government bonds and (2) private investment is crowded in. We find some supporting empirical evidence of this effect for the period 1929–1945.


Author(s):  
Pilar López-Sánchez ◽  
Elena Urquía-Grande ◽  
Cristina del Campo ◽  
Andrés L. Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 510-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Bernini ◽  
Giovanna Mariani ◽  
Delio Panaro

Considering a sample of Italian firms and defining a good Governance index (gGI), we investigated if there is a relation between the gGI, the performance and the default risk and which governance determinants are most responsible of these effects. To deepen the analysis, the aforementioned relations are also observed by comparing family and non-family firms and the companies more or less active in M&A. We found that the Corporate Governance quality presents some correlations with performance and risk. The non-family companies are better structured, showing a positive correlation between some Corporate Governance drivers and performance and Z-score. Furthermore, the “well-advised” firms in external strategies are able to obtain a better correlation with performance and also a good relation with Z-score.


2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Da ◽  
Pengjie Gao

AbstractWe show that the abnormal returns on high default risk stocks documented by Vassalou and Xing (2004) are driven by short-term return reversals rather than systematic default risk. These abnormal returns occur only during the month after portfolio formation and are concentrated in a small subset of stocks that had recently experienced large negative returns. Empirical evidence supports the view that the short-term return reversal arises from a liquidity shock triggered by a clientele change.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Uljarević ◽  
Giacomo Vivanti ◽  
Susan R. Leekam ◽  
Antonio Y. Hardan

Abstract The arguments offered by Jaswal & Akhtar to counter the social motivation theory (SMT) do not appear to be directly related to the SMT tenets and predictions, seem to not be empirically testable, and are inconsistent with empirical evidence. To evaluate the merits and shortcomings of the SMT and identify scientifically testable alternatives, advances are needed on the conceptualization and operationalization of social motivation across diagnostic boundaries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document