scholarly journals Primary Teachers’ Recommendations for the Development of a Teacher-Oriented Movement Assessment Tool for 4–7 Years Children

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-134
Author(s):  
Tom van Rossum ◽  
Lawrence Foweather ◽  
David Richardson ◽  
Spencer J. Hayes ◽  
David Morley
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Primary Teachers ◽  
Movement Assessment ◽  
Oriented Movement

Ghent Developmental Balance Test: A New Tool to Evaluate Balance Performance in Toddlers and Preschool Children

2012 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 841-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra De Kegel ◽  
Tina Baetens ◽  
Wim Peersman ◽  
Leen Maes ◽  
Ingeborg Dhooge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Clinical Group ◽  
Balance Performance ◽  
Balance Test ◽  
Movement Assessment ◽  
Z Scores

Background Balance is a fundamental component of movement. Early identification of balance problems is important to plan early intervention. The Ghent Developmental Balance Test (GDBT) is a new assessment tool designed to monitor balance from the initiation of independent walking to 5 years of age. Objective The purpose of this study was to establish the psychometric characteristics of the GDBT. Methods To evaluate test-retest reliability, 144 children were tested twice on the GDBT by the same examiner, and to evaluate interrater reliability, videotaped GDBT sessions of 22 children were rated by 3 different raters. To evaluate the known-group validity of GDBT scores, z scores on the GDBT were compared between a clinical group (n=20) and a matched control group (n=20). Concurrent validity of GDBT scores with the subscale standardized scores of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children–Second Edition (M-ABC-2), the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales–Second Edition (PDMS-2), and the balance subscale of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test–Second Edition (BOT-2) was evaluated in a combined group of the 20 children from the clinical group and 74 children who were developing typically. Results Test-retest and interrater reliability were excellent for the GDBT total scores, with intraclass correlation coefficients of .99 and .98, standard error of measurement values of 0.21 and 0.78, and small minimal detectable differences of 0.58 and 2.08, respectively. The GDBT was able to distinguish between the clinical group and the control group (t38=5.456, P<.001). Pearson correlations between the z scores on GDBT and the standardized scores of specific balance subscales of the M-ABC-2, PDMS-2, and BOT-2 were moderate to high, whereas correlations with subscales measuring constructs other than balance were low. Conclusions The GDBT is a reliable and valid clinical assessment tool for the evaluation of balance in toddlers and preschool-aged children.

scholarly journals Association of Infants Exposed to Prenatal Zika Virus Infection With Their Clinical, Neurologic, and Developmental Status Evaluated via the General Movement Assessment Tool

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. e187235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christa Einspieler ◽  
Fabiana Utsch ◽  
Patricia Brasil ◽  
Carolina Y. Panvequio Aizawa ◽  
Colleen Peyton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virus Infection ◽  
Zika Virus ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Developmental Status ◽  
Zika Virus Infection ◽  
Movement Assessment ◽  
General Movement

scholarly journals Inter- and Intra-observer Reliability of the “assessment of Motor Repertoire- 3 to 5 Months” Based on Video Recordings of Infants With PWS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Wang ◽  
Xiushu Shen ◽  
Hong Yang ◽  
Wei Shi ◽  
Xiaoyun Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Observer Agreement ◽  
Complete Agreement ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Observer Reliability ◽  
Video Recordings ◽  
Movement Assessment ◽  
General Movement

Abstract BackgroundThe “Assessment of Motor Repertoire - 3 to 5 Months”, which is part of Prechtl's General Movement Assessment (GMA), has been gradually applied to infants with genetic metabolic disorders. However, there still have been no studies on the application of GMA for infants with Prader-Williams Syndrome (PWS).Aimsthe purpose of this study was to determine inter- and intra-observer reliability of the assessment tool in PWS population.Study designReliability and agreement study.SubjectsThis was a cross-sectional study of 15 infants with PWS born at average gestational age 38 weeks.Outcome measuresStandardized video recordings of 15 infants with PWS (corrected ages 3 to 5 months) were independently assessed by three observers. Kappa and ICC statistics were applied in inter- and intra-observer reliability analysis.ResultsThe overall reliability ICCs values of “Motor Optimality Score” (MOS) ranged from 0.84 to 0.98 and the regarding pairwise agreement ranged between 0.86 and 0.95 in inter- observe reliability. In addition, ICC values for MOS ranged between 0.95 and 0.98 for respectively testers agreement in intra-observer reliability.The complete agreement reliability (100%) was achieved in subcategories of “Fidgety Movements” and “Movement Character” for the inter- and intra-observer. Moderate to high inter- and intra-observer reliability were found in subcategories of “Repertoire of Co-Existent Other Movements”, “Quality of Other Movements” and “Posture”, with kappa values ranging between 0.63 and 1.00. Conclusionhere were high levels of inter-and intra-observer agreement in the “Assessment of Motor Repertoire - 3 to 5 Months” for infants with PWS. It will be possible to carry out standardized quantitative assessment on the motor performance infants with PWS.

Age Norms for Auditory-Perceptual Neurophonetic Parameters: A Prerequisite for the Assessment of Childhood Dysarthria

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1071-1082
Author(s):  
Theresa Schölderle ◽  
Elisabet Haas ◽  
Wolfram Ziegler
Keyword(s):  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Developmental Trajectories ◽  
Voice Quality ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Typically Developing Children ◽  
Age Norms ◽  
Elementary School Age ◽  
Speech Characteristics ◽  
Substantial Progress ◽  
Computer Based

Purpose The aim of this study was to collect auditory-perceptual data on established symptom categories of dysarthria from typically developing children between 3 and 9 years of age, for the purpose of creating age norms for dysarthria assessment. Method One hundred forty-four typically developing children (3;0–9;11 [years;months], 72 girls and 72 boys) participated. We used a computer-based game specifically designed for this study to elicit sentence repetitions and spontaneous speech samples. Speech recordings were analyzed using the auditory-perceptual criteria of the Bogenhausen Dysarthria Scales, a standardized German assessment tool for dysarthria in adults. The Bogenhausen Dysarthria Scales (scales and features) cover clinically relevant dimensions of speech and allow for an evaluation of well-established symptom categories of dysarthria. Results The typically developing children exhibited a number of speech characteristics overlapping with established symptom categories of dysarthria (e.g., breathy voice, frequent inspirations, reduced articulatory precision, decreased articulation rate). Substantial progress was observed between 3 and 9 years of age, but with different developmental trajectories across different dimensions. In several areas (e.g., respiration, voice quality), 9-year-olds still presented with salient developmental speech characteristics, while in other dimensions (e.g., prosodic modulation), features typically associated with dysarthria occurred only exceptionally, even in the 3-year-olds. Conclusions The acquisition of speech motor functions is a prolonged process not yet completed with 9 years. Various developmental influences (e.g., anatomic–physiological changes) shape children's speech specifically. Our findings are a first step toward establishing auditory-perceptual norms for dysarthria in children of kindergarten and elementary school age. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12133380

Exploring the Validity and Operational Impact of Using Allied Health Assistants to Conduct Dysphagia Screening for Low-Risk Patients Within the Acute Hospital Setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1944-1955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Schwarz ◽  
Elizabeth C. Ward ◽  
Petrea Cornwell ◽  
Anne Coccetti ◽  
Pamela D'Netto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Hospital Setting ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
False Negatives ◽  
Exact Agreement ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Impact Phase ◽  
Operational Impact

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine (a) the agreement between allied health assistants (AHAs) and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) when completing dysphagia screening for low-risk referrals and at-risk patients under a delegation model and (b) the operational impact of this delegation model. Method All AHAs worked in the adult acute inpatient settings across three hospitals and completed training and competency evaluation prior to conducting independent screening. Screening (pass/fail) was based on results from pre-screening exclusionary questions in combination with a water swallow test and the Eating Assessment Tool. To examine the agreement of AHAs' decision making with SLPs, AHAs ( n = 7) and SLPs ( n = 8) conducted an independent, simultaneous dysphagia screening on 51 adult inpatients classified as low-risk/at-risk referrals. To examine operational impact, AHAs independently completed screening on 48 low-risk/at-risk patients, with subsequent clinical swallow evaluation conducted by an SLP with patients who failed screening. Results Exact agreement between AHAs and SLPs on overall pass/fail screening criteria for the first 51 patients was 100%. Exact agreement for the two tools was 100% for the Eating Assessment Tool and 96% for the water swallow test. In the operational impact phase ( n = 48), 58% of patients failed AHA screening, with only 10% false positives on subjective SLP assessment and nil identified false negatives. Conclusion AHAs demonstrated the ability to reliably conduct dysphagia screening on a cohort of low-risk patients, with a low rate of false negatives. Data support high level of agreement and positive operational impact of using trained AHAs to perform dysphagia screening in low-risk patients.

Measuring “Language Access Profiles” in Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children With the DHH Language Exposure Assessment Tool

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Hall ◽  
Stephanie De Anda
Keyword(s):  
Cluster Analysis ◽  
Exposure Assessment ◽  
Hard Of Hearing ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Communication Mode ◽  
Developmental Potential ◽  
Language Access ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Language Exposure ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Purpose The purposes of this study were (a) to introduce “language access profiles” as a viable alternative construct to “communication mode” for describing experience with language input during early childhood for deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children; (b) to describe the development of a new tool for measuring DHH children's language access profiles during infancy and toddlerhood; and (c) to evaluate the novelty, reliability, and validity of this tool. Method We adapted an existing retrospective parent report measure of early language experience (the Language Exposure Assessment Tool) to make it suitable for use with DHH populations. We administered the adapted instrument (DHH Language Exposure Assessment Tool [D-LEAT]) to the caregivers of 105 DHH children aged 12 years and younger. To measure convergent validity, we also administered another novel instrument: the Language Access Profile Tool. To measure test–retest reliability, half of the participants were interviewed again after 1 month. We identified groups of children with similar language access profiles by using hierarchical cluster analysis. Results The D-LEAT revealed DHH children's diverse experiences with access to language during infancy and toddlerhood. Cluster analysis groupings were markedly different from those derived from more traditional grouping rules (e.g., communication modes). Test–retest reliability was good, especially for the same-interviewer condition. Content, convergent, and face validity were strong. Conclusions To optimize DHH children's developmental potential, stakeholders who work at the individual and population levels would benefit from replacing communication mode with language access profiles. The D-LEAT is the first tool that aims to measure this novel construct. Despite limitations that future work aims to address, the present results demonstrate that the D-LEAT represents progress over the status quo.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document