scholarly journals CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA ALIMENTARIA EN MÉXICO: ANÁLISIS DE LA PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA EN EL NUEVO MILENIO (2000–2006) FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN MEXICO: ANALYSIS OF THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION IN THE NEW MILLENIUM (2000–2006)

2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-320
Author(s):  
J. A Ramírez de León ◽  
R. M. Uresti ◽  
G. Velazquez ◽  
M. Vázquez
2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Flávia Milagres CAMPOS ◽  
Shirley Donizete PRADO ◽  
Fabiana Bom KRAEMER ◽  
Francisco Romão FERREIRA ◽  
Maria Cláudia da Veiga Soares CARVALHO

ABSTRACT Objective: The present study aims to investigate the scenario of research on Food Service in Brazil based on the Stricto Sensu Graduate Programs in Nutrition, research groups, and scientific production. Methods: A search of the research lines including studies related to this topic and the researchers engaged in those studies was conducted. The research groups were identified on the Directory of Research Groups in Brazil website and the profile of the scientific production was based on articles included in the Scientific Electronic Library Online database. Articles published in international journals that were related to research lines focused on food production were also searched and analyzed. Results: The search identified only two graduate programs with research lines that describe the food production as the object of study although 13 graduate programs carry out research related to Food Service, especially focused on nutritional and sanitary aspects of food. The same trend was observed in the national articles. The internationalization of these two research line results from the academic publication in 22 different journals over the past 5 years. Thirty five professors were identified and most of them hold a PhD in Food Science and Technology. The number of research groups increased from two in 2000 to twenty nine in 2010. Conclusion: The inclusion of Food Service in graduate programs is still limited. The main trend observed is towards a closer relationship with Food Science and Technology in terms of the lines of research, professional qualification, and published studies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 215-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Acosta ◽  
Daniel Coronado ◽  
Esther Ferrándiz ◽  
M. Dolores León ◽  
Pedro J. Moreno

Food Control ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 108116
Author(s):  
John Dzikunoo ◽  
Emmanuel Letsyo ◽  
Zeenatu Adams ◽  
David Asante-Donyinah ◽  
Courage Sedem Dzah

Foods ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1128
Author(s):  
Giacomo Squeo ◽  
Davide De Angelis ◽  
Riccardo Leardi ◽  
Carmine Summo ◽  
Francesco Caponio

Background: Mixtures play a key role in Food Science and Technology. For studying them, rational approaches should be used. In detail, the experimental designs for mixtures are useful tools for studying the effects of ingredients/components in formulations. Results: Food Science and Technology is the fourth category among the total records considered in this review. The applications span from food formulation to the composition of modified atmosphere, shelf-life improvement and bioactives extraction. However, the majority of the studies regards few products and ingredients. Simplex-lattice and simplex-centroid designs are the most common used, although some optimal designs, such as the D-optimal, have also interesting applications. Finally, some issues are highlighted, which basically regard the interpretation of the models coefficients and the lack of model validation. Conclusion: In the last decade, mixture designs have been fairly used in the field of Food Science and Technology. Modeling the response(s) allows researchers to achieve a global knowledge of the system under study within the defined experimental domain. However, the majority of application has regarded limited classes of products, and thus an increase in the spectrum of applications is desired.


1999 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Murcott

This article sketches a sociology in the making that arises out of the case of GM food in Britain in 1999. It is presented with a view to moving, collaboratively, towards its further study. A ‘considered sociology’ is not original. It requires treating as an integral and enduring part of the field of investigation the historical and social characterisation of that same field. An evaluation of the sociology of food indicates that field's limitations for the examination of GM food, with one key exception. The article moves on to propose the need for (a) an as yet underinvestigated field of the industrialisation of food together with the role of science and technology within it, and (b) an examination of the industrialised (social) scientific production of ‘the consumer’. These may then serve as a basis for examining the manner in which public coverage of GM food could be characterised not as a matter of science but of a PR and is now publicly construed as a debate, ‘pro’ and ‘anti’.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document