Surgical and orthodontic approach for a patient with a severely constricted maxillary arch caused by bilateral cleft lip and palate

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 127-134
Author(s):  
Ayaka Oka ◽  
Hiroshi Kurosaka ◽  
Kohei Nakatsugawa ◽  
Takashi Yamashiro
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Maxillary Arch

Effect of an Intraoral Retrusion Plate on Maxillary Arch Dimensions in Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara C. M. Oosterkamp ◽  
Robert P. van Oort ◽  
Pieter U. Dijkstra ◽  
Kees Stellingsma ◽  
Michiel W. J. Bierman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Average Increase ◽  
Dependent Observations ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Student’S T ◽  
Maxillary Arch ◽  
Student’S T Test

Objective The aim of this study was to analyze maxillary arch dimensions in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate treated with an intraoral retrusion plate prior to lip closure. Patients The effects of the intraoral retrusion plate were evaluated on serially obtained maxillary casts of 14 patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Results The Student's t test for dependent observations showed a significant decrease in distance between the premaxilla and the cleft lateral segments during active treatment. This decrease correlated with an increase in deviation of the premaxilla in relation to the vomer. For each millimeter decrease in distance between the premaxilla and the cleft lateral segments, an average increase in deviation of 4.0 degrees was found. Left and right cleft widths decreased significantly, premaxillary width increased significantly, and transverse dimensions did not change significantly. Conclusion From this study it can be concluded that active presurgical treatment with an intraoral retrusion plate induces a significant decrease in distance between the premaxilla and the lateral segments. This decrease is frequently accompanied by an increase in deviation of the premaxilla relative to the vomer.

Maxillary Arch Dimensions in Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate from Birth until Four Years of Age in Boys

1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiki L.W.M. Heidbuchel ◽  
Anne M. Kuijpers-Jagtman ◽  
Gem J.C. Kramer ◽  
Birte Prahl-Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Posterior Arch ◽  
Anterior Arch ◽  
Arch Width ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
The University ◽  
Maxillary Arch

Objective To describe the development of maxillary arch dimensions in children with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) during the first 4 years of life and to compare it with that in noncleft children. Design This was a retrospective, mixed-longitudinal study. Setting The study was conducted at the Cleft Palate Center of the University Hospital of Nijmegen. Subjects The sample consisted of 26 boys with BCLP who were born between 1976 and 1990 and treated at the University Hospital of Nijmegen. Data for a control group of 34 noncleft boys were collected at the University Hospital of Amsterdam. Method Palatal arch dimensions were digitized on dental casts. A comparison between BCLP and noncleft dimensions was made at fixed time intervals. Results At birth, anterior and posterior arch widths as well as arch depths were significantly larger in children with BCLP. After 7 months (lip closure), anterior arch width and arch depth diminished considerably in the cleft group. After 12 months (palatoplasty), a slight decrease in posterior arch width was observed, and arch depths showed slight catch-up growth. At 4 years of age, anterior arch width was significantly narrower and anterior arch depth was shorter in children with BCLP than in control subjects. Posterior arch width was significantly wider. Conclusions During the first 4 years of life, maxillary arch dimensions in children with BCLP show a unique development that is significantly different from that in noncleft children.

Maxillary Arch Dimensions in Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate from Birth until Four Years of Age in Boys

1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiki L. W. M. Heidbuchel ◽  
Anne M. Kuijpers-Jagtman ◽  
Gem J. C. Kramer ◽  
Birte Prahl-Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Maxillary Arch

Occlusal Relationship in Patients with Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate during the Mixed Dentition Stage: Does Neonatal Maxillary Arch Configuration Predetermine Outcome?

2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad A. Perlyn ◽  
Jeffrey N. Brownstein ◽  
Donald V. Huebner ◽  
Jeffrey L. Marsh ◽  
Richard J. Nissen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Maxillary Arch

Objective: To determine whether there is any correlation between initial maxillary arch dysmorphology patterns in complete bilateral cleft lip/palate (BCLP) and the subsequent occlusal relationship in early mixed dentition. Design: This retrospective study evaluated 41 consecutive patients with complete BCLP who were managed by a single tertiary cleft team between 1983 and 1992. All patients had bilateral synchronous lip adhesions with placement of a passive alveolar molding appliance at 4 to 8 weeks of age; definitive modified Manchester lip repair at 6 to 8 months of age; and a one-stage “two-flap” palatoplasty at 14 months of age. Neither gingivoperiosteoplasty nor early alveolar bone grafting was performed. Four patients required early surgical premaxillary setback because of adverse social reactions to a very protrusive premaxilla. All patients (7 to 9 years) were assessed prior to initiation of first-phase orthodontics (maxillary expansion) in anticipation of alveolar bone grafting. Cleft team records were reviewed to determine initial maxillary arch dysmorphology, treatment, and occlusal relationships in early mixed dentition stage. The initial maxillary dysmorphology was classified using a new grouping based on orientation of the vomer, the intercanine distance, and its symmetry. Patterns of mixed dentition occlusion were then compared with group type, and predication tables were generated. Because midface retrusion is the major dentoskeletal morbidity in cleft patients, angle Class I and II occlusions were designated as “favorable” and Class III as “unfavorable.” Results: In early mixed dentition, approximately three-fourths of patients with complete BCLP had favorable occlusion and one-fourth unfavorable occlusion. The occlusal status seemed unrelated to the initial maxillary arch dysmorphology, the use of early passive alveolar molding appliance, or surgical premaxillary setback. Conclusion: Patterns of variation within the initial dysmorphology of the maxillary arch in infants with complete BCLP cannot be used to predetermine subsequent molar occlusal relationships in the mixed dentition.

scholarly journals Speech in a consecutive series of children born with cleft lip and palate with and without syndromes and/or additional malformations

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Klintö ◽  
Maria Sporre ◽  
Magnus Becker
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Total Group ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Audio Recordings ◽  
Bilateral Cleft Lip ◽  
Palatal Surgery ◽  
Group Comparisons

Abstract Background When evaluating speech in children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP/L), children with known syndromes and/or additional malformations (CP/L+) are usually excluded. The aim of this study was to present speech outcome of a consecutive series of 5-year-olds born with CP/L, and to compare speech results of children with CP/L + and children with CP/L without known syndromes and/or additional malformations (CP/L-). Methods One hundred 5-year-olds (20 with CP/L+; 80 with CP/L-) participated. All children were treated with primary palatal surgery in one stage with the same procedure for muscle reconstruction. Three independent judges performed phonetic transcriptions and rated perceived velopharyngeal competence from audio recordings. Based on phonetic transcriptions, percent consonants correct (PCC) and percent non-oral errors were investigated. Group comparisons were performed. Results In the total group, mean PCC was 88.2 and mean percent non-oral errors 1.5. The group with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) had poorer results on both measures compared to groups with other cleft types. The average results of PCC and percent non-oral errors in the CP/L + group indicated somewhat poorer speech, but no significant differences were observed. In the CP/L + group, 25 % were judged as having incompetent velopharyngeal competence, compared to 15 % in the CP/L- group. Conclusions The results indicated relatively good speech compared to speech of children with CP/L in previous studies. Speech was poorer in many children with more extensive clefts. No significant differences in speech outcomes were observed between CP/L + and CP/L- groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document